Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Backup vs StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Backup
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (9th)
StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL]
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

RituparnaBhattacharya - PeerSpot reviewer
Achieve cost savings and efficiency with high-level restore capabilities
I use Azure Backup mainly for backing up virtual machines The feature I find most effective in Azure Backup is the high-level restore. Additionally, it has a good impact on our cost savings and operational efficiency as it is a low-cost solution. The area that I believe needs improvement in…
YH
Provides good technical support and effective backup features
We use StorageCraft ShadowXafe as a data protection solution The most valuable feature is the backups. StorageCraft ShadowXafe should improve the on-premises console management controls and protection and recovery. Additionally, there should be two connection engines to the physical server. I…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Enables immediate recovery and immediate restoration."
"It is a stable solution...It is a highly scalable solution."
"It offers seamless integration."
"Automation provides us more time to work on other tasks, avoiding repetitive tasks and saving hours that we can allocate elsewhere. This gives more free time for involvement in other activities instead of repetitive data pulling."
"The fact that Azure Backup is integrated is one of its biggest advantages."
"The product is very reliable and easy to use."
"The storage backup is very efficient."
"There is only one feature, and that is the backup."
"I like that they have some new devices that are simpler to use because they kind of tie right into the cloud."
"The most valuable feature is the backups."
 

Cons

"The solution is still in its infancy; it's not a mature product yet."
"The reporting functionality of Azure Backup needs improvement."
"Azure Backup needs improvements in allowing more specific backup options rather than just full VM snapshots."
"Technical support can be slow to respond at times."
"For companies frequently accessing data or not using Microsoft Azure, the solution may not be very helpful."
"The area that I believe needs improvement in Azure Backup is the restoring time."
"Azure Backup could improve by offering better integration for Oracle databases and enhancing features like granular restore and backup compliance capabilities."
"It still does not have a lot of customization, especially if your workloads are not in Azure."
"StorageCraft ShadowXafe should improve the on-premises console management controls and protection and recovery."
"Their restoration protocols could be better. I pulled all my clients out of their cloud mostly because I wasn't confident that they could restore out of the cloud. This was backed up by friends who had been burned by stuff like that. We moved away because of the lack of resources to restore from a potential catastrophic failure. It's challenging, and in some cases, they couldn't do it because they didn't have enough resources. For example, if there was a major disaster, and everybody needed their images out of the cloud, they couldn't give them to everybody."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is somewhat high and could be lower."
"We do not have any additional costs for Azure Backup."
"We have enterprise-level pricing. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."
"Customers prefer Azure Backup because it has a pay-as-you-go model, and they won't have to pay an upfront amount at the initial level."
"The product is neither too expensive nor too cheap."
"It's around $10 to $15 per month per virtual machine, along with something extra based on the size of the data."
"The price should be cheaper, but it's affordable if you use the yearly subscription."
"The product's pricing is a three or four out of ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is costly."
"They are more expensive than some of the others out there. We have gone away from their cloud due to pricing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
867,783 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business26
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise22
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Azure Backup differ from Veeam Backup & Replication?
Veeam has a version for Azure but there are organizations, like ours, that are considering moving to an Azure environment and wonder if Azure Backup is better than Veeam Backup and Replication (Vee...
What do you like most about Azure Backup?
Azure Backup is easy to configure and restore.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Backup?
The pricing of Azure Backup is fine; it is a low-cost solution.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
ShadowXafe
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Somerset County Council, Kardem, PCL Construction
Kawasaki, NASA, Amazon, Sonic, Callaway
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: August 2025.
867,783 professionals have used our research since 2012.