We performed a comparison between Azure Backup and StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."It is a stable solution...It is a highly scalable solution."
"The fact that Azure Backup is integrated is one of its biggest advantages."
"With Azure Backup, you can readily make your environment if your setup somehow fails on the cloud or on-premises."
"The deployment process is quite easy in Azure."
"It is easy to schedule backups."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Backup is its ease of use and good integration with other Azure services."
"The storage backup is very efficient."
"It offers seamless integration."
"I like that they have some new devices that are simpler to use because they kind of tie right into the cloud."
"The most valuable feature is the backups."
"I would like to see better integration with more products, and more services."
"We would like to see some kind of notification given to the user that a file was not synchronized well or what may have happened."
"Technical support is in need of improvement."
"On-prem can be complex to set up but the cloud is simple."
"The length of time it takes to restore is our main source of frustration. It would be beneficial to shorten the time it takes."
"Lacks an AI system that would enable easier upgrading of the hardware."
"The tool's backup should be faster. Azure Backup's support should be faster."
"Azure lacks sufficient solutions for a particular scenario, we may need to resort to using third-party applications. In such cases, these applications can be employed to facilitate backup, replication, and the efficient utilization of internet connectivity and bandwidth. They enable us to effectively manage and transfer data while ensuring optimal utilization of network resources. However, it would be a benefit if we did not have to use third-party applications for these operations."
"Their restoration protocols could be better. I pulled all my clients out of their cloud mostly because I wasn't confident that they could restore out of the cloud. This was backed up by friends who had been burned by stuff like that. We moved away because of the lack of resources to restore from a potential catastrophic failure. It's challenging, and in some cases, they couldn't do it because they didn't have enough resources. For example, if there was a major disaster, and everybody needed their images out of the cloud, they couldn't give them to everybody."
"StorageCraft ShadowXafe should improve the on-premises console management controls and protection and recovery."
More StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Azure Backup is ranked 7th in Backup and Recovery with 50 reviews while StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Backup and Recovery. Azure Backup is rated 7.8, while StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Azure Backup writes "Straightforward to set up and manage and allows us to monitor all backups in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] writes "An expensive next-generation data recovery and backup software solution with poor data restoration". Azure Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Commvault Cloud, Acronis Cyber Protect and Veritas NetBackup, whereas StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.