Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs Layer7 API Management comparison

Axway and Broadcom are both solutions in the API Management category. Axway is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.8, while Broadcom is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0. Axway holds a 1.6% mindshare in APIM, compared to Broadcom’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Read 16 Axway AMPLIFY API Management reviews

2,773 Views
2,745 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Layer7 API Management

Read 112 Layer7 API Management reviews

6,335 Views
6,272 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Layer7 API Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Layer7 API Management and Axway AMPLIFY API Management both compete in the API management space. Axway seems to have an upper hand with flexible deployment options and competitive pricing.

Features: Layer7 API Management offers strong security features including OAuth, seamless SiteMinder integration, and mobile capabilities. Axway AMPLIFY provides robust security, policy management, and API governance, with flexible deployment options.

Room for Improvement: Layer7 could enhance its developer portal and token support, often requiring additional purchases. Axway can improve its deployment model, technical support, and user experience, but users value ongoing updates.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Layer7 generally focuses on on-premises deployment with limited cloud integration and mixed customer support reviews post-Broadcom acquisition. Axway offers versatile hybrid and cloud deployment options with high customer support satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Layer7 is often considered expensive with complex licensing and high initial costs for ROI, though users find the costs justifiable given its capabilities. Axway is competitively priced with full feature access, transparent pricing, yet may be costlier compared to cloud-only solutions. Both show potential for ROI, but Layer7 faces more scrutiny for high upfront costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. Layer7 API Management Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. Layer7 API Management

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Ranking in API Management

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Layer7 API Management

Ranking in API Management

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

112

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY API Management is 1.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Layer7 API Management is 1.9%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Layer7 API Management	1.9%
Axway AMPLIFY API Management	1.6%
Other	96.5%

API Management

Featured Reviews

AnkitSingh6

Senior Lead Analytics Engineer at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Comprehensive API management has improved monetization and streamlined secure integrations

Axway AMPLIFY API Management could be improved in terms of user interface and navigation, as it could be more user-friendly. There are no helping resources such as question marks or help icons to easily identify elements, making it difficult for new users to learn the platform without some form of training. The configuration and policy setups also require multiple steps, which complicates the process, and it would be easier if some steps could be skipped. Better analytics and reporting capabilities should provide improved trackability for API performance and consumer behavior. Documentation for advanced use cases would help reduce the learning curve. However, when trying to integrate with third parties, it can be quite difficult and requires a lot of authentication and authorization, which is better for security but poses challenges for new users trying to connect with a third party to transfer data between platforms. Additionally, the customization options for the dashboard are very limited, which restricts my ability to customize the entire dashboard meaningfully.

Read full review

C Vvanigalla

Works

Integration capabilities excel and support for varied platforms enhances communication across backend systems

We mainly use REST APIs, and the solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It allows communication with a number of back-end providers and data consolidation. The flexibility to develop APIs for various platforms, from front-end applications to ATM machines, is valuable. Code changes and migration are straightforward, and it supports identity and access management integration.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The administration tool for this solution is good."

"This platform can be highly scalable."

"We like the portal for documentation a lot."

"The most useful features in Axway AMPLIFY API Management, in my opinion, primarily involve the security aspect of the product, which provides us very good methods of securing the network."

"Axway is a good product according to Gartner which is why we started to adopt it."

"The UI and UX are quite good and easy to understand."

"For what we do, the API portal capability is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable features are security enforcement and throttling."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management pros

"It is flexible in how it creates custom policies and uses builds with impressive methods."

"The actual management of APIs is fundamental to us, as we're a heavy API user/provider. So, obviously, a centralised management platform is important."

"The scalability has been good; we haven't had to scale up a whole lot, even with all the extra transactions we're running through it, and we're in the area of about 2 and a half million OAuth tokens issued per hour and it's performing fine with that."

"CA API Management powers the next generation of mobile and Internet of Things (IoT) applications by providing reliable connectivity between data, people, apps and devices."

"We have been using API Gateway for four years and we have huge class actions, like 600 parts per second, and we have not seen any issues as of now."

"Stability is great."

"The solution helped us to quickly publish and monetize APIs, and I have used versioning responses to publish or send APIs to different customers with different versions."

"It's benefited us greatly in allowing us to expose our APIs to external third-party vendors in a secure fashion."

More Layer7 API Management pros

Cons

"I have experienced issues with Axway AMPLIFY API Management's stability at times, particularly when there are a large number of API calls."

"Areas of improvement include marketing and enhancing the data products area by using ETIs."

"In terms of customer service, the company needs to be easier to contact, and the support team needs to understand the situation and the product itself better."

"The API Mocking tools need to be improved."

"Not a ten because of the pricing and technical support."

"We sometimes have issues with some of the functions because they do not work very well."

"It would be great if they have an asset report. It's hard to get support for that."

"Sometimes we find bugs where certain calls are not returning all the data we need."

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management cons

"Scalability is a bit tough if it is a production environment."

"The products developer portals can be better."

"There could be more integration options included in the product."

"The support that is available is only for technical issues, they are not able to help you with your use case."

"There are old algorithms that the tool does not support - and it shouldn't, in my opinion. But sometimes customers need old algorithms, from old use cases and old applications, migrated to the platform. At those times, there are hiccups that happen."

"It would be nice if we could create APIs directly from Swagger files. We're doing that ourselves with a middle layer. But if you could integrate with open API Swagger specs, and then just create a Swagger and upload it to the gateway and it would create all my API template policy, and would apply the OAuth restrictions, the types of security restrictions I have on there, that would be pretty cool."

"They are getting there. Docker-based containers are there now, but it is not completed, I think."

"The Portal lacks maturity. Since the move from Portal 3.x to 4.x, a lot of features were removed. It is slowly coming back. I can see a lot of changes are done in the "background" to decouple components and make it more flexible. Those changes are just not getting to the UI side quick enough."

More Layer7 API Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive. When you acquire a license you have full access to the solution, unlike other competitors such as Apigee X, where there are fragmented licenses. Some licenses only allow access to certain features while others allow access to more features. Upon procuring this solution's license, you will have full access to the solution, allowing you to experiment with all of its features."

"The price of Layer7 API Management is too high and should be reduced. However, it is a good solution in the market."

"I do not have experience with the pricing or licensing of the product."

"The price of Layer7 API Management is reasonable compared to Apigee."

"APIs can be developed to provide security. We can show them in one single pane of glass, such as the CA API Management API Developer Portal. It is there that we can provide the monetization for their APIs and what is happening on third-party applications, like Paytm or BookMyShow."

"It was very high at that time. We are a Broadcom CA partner, and we got it only for testing purposes. We didn't pay anything for it."

"There are various licensing models for Layer7 API Management. We have to buy additional licenses to get new versions."

"CA API Management has a licensing path. If you want more features, it requires more licenses and more installation time."

"It's my manager who takes care of the pricing. But I keep on hearing that it's a little pricey, it's on the higher side. That is what he says."

More Layer7 API Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Marketing Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	84

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

The pricing for Axway AMPLIFY API Management is quite high for small companies, organizations, or teams. The setup cost is also high, and licensing is very limited. They should restructure everythi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

I have used Axway AMPLIFY API Management to expose and manage APIs across different internal and external applications, which helps secure the API, monitor traffic, and control access through polic...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Layer7 API Management?

Pricing is more than average. While I am used to Layer7 API Management ( /products/layer7-api-management-reviews ), seeing other products makes the tool's pricing seem high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Layer7 API Management?

Broadcom's push for upgrades from version nine to ten, ten to 10.3, and onwards to twelve needs improvement in migration processes, especially with service dependencies. The migration path sometime...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Layer7 API Management?

I am not the client. I implement Layer7 API Management ( /products/layer7-api-management-reviews ) for the clients. I have worked on multiple projects as a developer, implementing for Hydro Tasmani...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apigee vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY API Management Competitors

Apigee vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 15% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 6% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs Layer7 API Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Layer7 API Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management

August 2026

Download Axway AMPLIFY API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Layer7 API Management

August 2026

Download Layer7 API Management product report

Also Known As

Vordel Application Gateway, Axway API Management Plus, Axway API Management, AMPLIFY API Management

CA API Management, CA Live API Creator, Espresso Logic, CA API Gateway

Overview

Axway AMPLIFY API Management offers secure and user-friendly API management solutions supporting flexible deployment options while ensuring robust security for data exchange and centralized management for developers.

Axway AMPLIFY API Management emphasizes strong security measures against threats, facilitating authenticated data exchange. Its centralized management tools enable efficient API analytics and portal usage. The platform's flexible deployment options, including on-premise and cloud solutions, are coupled with a user-friendly interface featuring drag-and-drop functionalities to streamline operations. However, improvements are needed in Amplify Central portal, customization features, and scalability options. While used primarily as an API gateway for internet, web, and REST APIs, companies leverage its features to create secure connections and integrate APIs internally and externally, fostering a comprehensive API ecosystem.

What are the key features of Axway AMPLIFY API Management?

Security: Offers comprehensive protection against threats with authenticated data exchanges.
Centralized Management: Streamlines developer tasks with efficient API analytics and portal management.
Flexibility: Provides on-premise and cloud deployment options to suit operational needs.
Drag-and-Drop Interface: Simplifies operations and enhances efficiency.
Governance and Policy Creation: Effective tools for managing policies and ensuring high performance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Efficiency: Centralized tools streamline operations and improve management efficiency.
Scalability: Supports substantial data volumes efficiently despite needing improvements.
Security: Ensures secure and authenticated data exchanges for peace of mind.
Integration Capabilities: Facilitates seamless connections with communication partners.
Hybrid-Cloud Capabilities: Leverages hybrid-cloud environments for a robust API ecosystem.

In the financial services industry, Axway AMPLIFY API Management is integral in creating secure marketplaces and ensuring reliable communication among partners. Its robust security and hybrid-cloud capabilities make it ideal for creating sophisticated API ecosystems, facilitating both internal and external integrations essential for modern operations.

Axway

Layer7 API Management is a comprehensive solution that enables organizations to securely expose, manage, and monetize their APIs.

It provides features such as API gateway, developer portal, analytics, and security to ensure seamless integration and control over API traffic.

With Layer7 API Management, businesses can streamline their API operations and drive innovation.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Engie Group, Allianz

1. IBM 2. Microsoft 3. Oracle 4. Salesforce 5. SAP 6. Cisco 7. Dell 8. HP 9. Adobe 10. VMware 11. Accenture 12. Capgemini 13. Deloitte 14. PwC 15. Ernst & Young 16. Infosys 17. TCS (Tata Consultancy Services) 18. Wipro 19. Cognizant 20. HCL Technologies 21. Tech Mahindra 22. Fujitsu 23. Hitachi 24. NEC 25. NTT Data 26. Ericsson 27. Nokia 28. Siemens 29. AT&T 30. Verizon 31. Vodafone 32. Orange

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. Layer7 API Management

June 2026

Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. Layer7 API Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. Layer7 API Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. Layer7 API Management report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.