Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Layer7 API Management vs MuleSoft API Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.7
Layer7 API Management offers business growth and protection, with varying ROI timelines; quick benefits are observed by many users.
Sentiment score
5.9
MuleSoft API Manager improves process reusability and automation, enhancing development speed, reducing costs, and ensuring seamless, cost-effective integration.
This iPaaS platform with CloudHub eliminates variable infrastructure-related costs and saves enterprises on connectivity and operations costs, as everything comes bundled from the MuleSoft side.
Enterprise Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.3
Layer7 API Management is praised for support and resources, though some users note post-acquisition service challenges.
Sentiment score
7.3
MuleSoft API Manager's customer service is responsive and knowledgeable, though some users seek better priority clarity and business focus.
Technical support is excellent, and I would rate them as ten.
Our enterprise pays for a special success program, which provides priority support.
Lead Software Engineer at Franklin Templeton
If bug fixing is required for downtimes or issues, we receive prompt support with alternative solutions or workarounds.
Enterprise Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
They can be slow in addressing security vulnerabilities.
Senior Developer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Layer7 API Management efficiently scales to handle significant traffic, supporting millions of daily requests with proper configuration.
Sentiment score
7.0
MuleSoft API Manager is praised for scalability, effectively handling growth despite some costly scaling challenges and configuration variability.
All nodes communicate with one primary database, affecting connections and causing crashes under high load.
Regarding availability, especially with iPaaS solutions, they guarantee 99.99%.
Enterprise Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Layer7 API Management is stable and reliable, with minor scalability issues, often resolved through updates and support.
Sentiment score
7.8
MuleSoft API Manager is praised for stability and reliability, with some concerns about connectors and hardware setup.
Without rebooting for ninety to one hundred eighty days, cache builds up in Linux boxes, causing memory utilization issues.
There was an issue when trying to implement a request-reply pattern using JMS, which was not functioning as expected despite being documented.
Senior Developer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Layer7 API Management needs improvements in UI, documentation, integration, functionality, training, policy tools, monitoring, reporting, and migration.
MuleSoft API Manager needs improved load balancing, integration, affordability, setup, customization, documentation, analytics, and Salesforce integration details.
Broadcom's push for upgrades from version nine to ten, ten to 10.3, and onwards to twelve needs improvement in migration processes, especially with service dependencies.
Introducing features related to auto governance without manual effort would make the API Manager smarter and more efficient for enterprises with complex landscapes.
Lead Software Engineer at Franklin Templeton
Managing the cost of MuleSoft, particularly the billing model based on the number of active cores/threads, has been challenging.
Senior Developer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
 

Setup Cost

Layer7 API Management offers competitive pricing with Essential and Enterprise tiers, though perceived costly for smaller enterprises.
MuleSoft API Manager is pricey, but valued for features; costs can prompt exploration of cheaper integration tools.
Seeing other products makes the tool's pricing seem high.
The pricing is high, which is the biggest point where some customers are hesitant about adopting it.
Founder at EAIESB
The major challenge they face is the high pricing, which has become notable especially since they transitioned from a VCore to a usage-based subscription.
Enterprise Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
MuleSoft is typically more expensive compared to using Java or Spring Boot APIs hosted in containers.
Senior Developer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
 

Valuable Features

Layer7 API Management excels with robust security, scalability, and features like content routing and drag-and-drop functionality.
MuleSoft API Manager offers scalable API management, seamless integration, security features, and low-code tools for efficient development and insights.
The flexibility to develop APIs for various platforms, from front-end applications to ATM machines, is valuable.
MuleSoft's ability to connect to third-party monitoring platforms like AWS, Datadog, and Elastic makes operational analysis more efficient.
Lead Software Engineer at Franklin Templeton
It also enables us to create additional layers of authentication, like integrating external providers for OAuth, within reduced timelines.
Senior Developer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
In MuleSoft API Manager, I find features like throttling and security to be the most valuable, as these are the things we use and configure as part of our deployments.
Founder at EAIESB
 

Categories and Ranking

Layer7 API Management
Ranking in API Management
12th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
112
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
MuleSoft API Manager
Ranking in API Management
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Layer7 API Management is 2.4%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft API Manager is 4.6%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
MuleSoft API Manager4.6%
Layer7 API Management2.4%
Other93.0%
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

Integration capabilities excel and support for varied platforms enhances communication across backend systems
We mainly use REST APIs, and the solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It allows communication with a number of back-end providers and data consolidation. The flexibility to develop APIs for various platforms, from front-end applications to ATM machines, is valuable. Code changes and migration are straightforward, and it supports identity and access management integration.
D.Rajesh Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Improved Integration Efficiency and Potential for Further Enhancements in Monitoring and User Experience
The policies in MuleSoft API Manager are significant features. We get the policies by default, with more than 25 out-of-the-box policies. If any additional requirement exists specific to the customer, there is a custom policy framework. We can build the policy according to our requirement, and deploy and enable it at the API Manager level to consume across different business groups, environments, or organizations altogether within the platform. Developing the custom policy is not challenging; you just need to follow the custom policy framework to implement. The custom policy and the different levels of SLAs of the API Manager are notable. Regarding the monitoring side of the API Manager, MuleSoft provides substantial monitoring with logs, offering search capability, raw data accessibility, and different subscriptions. With the top tier, integration with third-party platforms such as ELK or Splunk becomes unnecessary because all search capabilities, dashboards, and functional monitoring can be built within the platform itself. This is excellent from the monitoring perspective, and there have been recent improvements focusing on observability. For DevOps, if you want to make your continuous integration and continuous deployment effective, irrespective of the tool, there are options to integrate. For example, you can use the Maven plugin, platform APIs, or CLI to build your end-to-end DevOps cycle.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise84
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise43
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Layer7 API Management?
Pricing is more than average. While I am used to Layer7 API Management ( /products/layer7-api-management-reviews ), seeing other products makes the tool's pricing seem high.
What needs improvement with Layer7 API Management?
Broadcom's push for upgrades from version nine to ten, ten to 10.3, and onwards to twelve needs improvement in migration processes, especially with service dependencies. The migration path sometime...
How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?
The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that ...
How does Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager compare with Amazon API Gateway?
I have found that Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the best integration tool out there for API management. It is easy to implement and learn; it provides several options for deployment, (including ...
What do you like most about Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?
The most valuable features of the solution for securing APIs stem from the tool's ability to allow users to deploy policies.
 

Also Known As

CA API Management, CA Live API Creator, Espresso Logic, CA API Gateway
Anypoint API Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. IBM  2. Microsoft  3. Oracle  4. Salesforce  5. SAP  6. Cisco  7. Dell  8. HP  9. Adobe  10. VMware  11. Accenture  12. Capgemini  13. Deloitte  14. PwC  15. Ernst & Young  16. Infosys  17. TCS (Tata Consultancy Services)  18. Wipro  19. Cognizant  20. HCL Technologies  21. Tech Mahindra  22. Fujitsu  23. Hitachi  24. NEC  25. NTT Data  26. Ericsson  27. Nokia  28. Siemens  29. AT&T  30. Verizon  31. Vodafone  32. Orange
Coca-Cola, Splunk, Citrix, UCSF, Vertu, State of Colorado, National Post, TiVo, Deakin, LLS, Oldcastle Precast, ParcelPoint, Justice Systems, Ube, Sumitomo Corporation, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Groupe Initiatives, Camelot, Panviva
Find out what your peers are saying about Layer7 API Management vs. MuleSoft API Manager and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.