Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Identity and Access Management vs Axiad Conductor comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.4
Omada Identity's high initial cost is offset by reduced maintenance costs, improved security, and process efficiency, but ROI measurement is challenging.
Sentiment score
4.8
AWS IAM boosts productivity with automation, efficient access, scalability, and security, offering significant ROI despite some cost drawbacks.
Sentiment score
7.4
Axiad Conductor reduces help desk interactions by 35%, saves labor hours, and cuts user costs by up to 15%.
I believe AWS provides significant ROI by reducing infrastructure costs and improving scalability and business agility.
AWS Identity and Access Management ensures security and allows for scalable application deployment.
It saves time by not requiring extensive manual setup.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Omada Identity's technical support is praised for responsiveness, but outdated documentation and inconsistent response times pose challenges.
Sentiment score
5.7
AWS Identity and Access Management is intuitive; most users manage internally, avoiding paid tech support and using documentation.
Sentiment score
8.3
Axiad Conductor's customer service is praised for responsiveness, expertise, and successful feature integration, though occasional delays occur.
We do not contact their technical support directly because we have a service agreement already in place with them with some dedicated and some non-dedicated resources.
Responses from AWS engineers aren't always direct, so when urgent issues occur, I manage them immediately and prioritize solutions.
The service is straightforward, and I haven't encountered much complexity.
We haven't needed to contact technical support as the IAM tool is intuitive and configured on our end.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Omada Identity is praised for its scalability in cloud and hybrid environments, despite minor performance and customization feedback.
Sentiment score
6.1
AWS IAM is scalable and integrates well but needs improved centralized permissions and auto-scaling for large organizations.
Sentiment score
8.1
Axiad Conductor scales well up to 100,000 users but faces cost challenges beyond, maintaining robust and seamless integration.
Scalability in AWS is significantly easier compared to on-premise solutions.
I implemented centralized and scalable solutions to improve larger setups.
The system's scalability could be enhanced to support larger organizations and better integrate with existing applications.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Omada Identity is stable, with minimal issues, occasional bugs, and high ratings for reliability and performance.
Sentiment score
7.2
AWS Identity and Access Management is highly stable, securing networks effectively, with minor performance issues quickly resolved.
Sentiment score
8.0
Axiad Conductor is praised for its flawless, stable performance in credential management, with minimal downtime and no unplanned outages.
It was initially tough to identify the cause, yet by simplifying user management and utilizing group roles, I have managed to solve these issues.
AWS Identity and Access Management is designed to keep networks secure by ensuring only authorized users can access necessary data.
AWS Identity and Access Management is very stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Omada Identity needs UI improvements, better scalability, integration, documentation, and cost-effective upgrades, with enhanced API and automation.
AWS IAM needs a user-friendly interface, better permissions, scalable integration, and improved tracking for enhanced security and efficiency.
Users seek Axiad Conductor enhancements, including modern design, Canadian hosting, and FIDO U2F support, amidst macOS update challenges.
The biggest issue, which is the reason why we are transitioning from their product to SailPoint, is the overall user experience.
If AWS could provide an option to automatically create templates based on desired access requirements, it would be extremely beneficial, especially for documentation and troubleshooting purposes.
AWS Identity and Access Management needs improvement in the prevention of unauthorized access to sensitive data and models.
The user activity tracking in AWS Identity and Access Management should be enhanced to provide detailed descriptions of user activities.
 

Setup Cost

Omada Identity offers cost-effective on-premises pricing, though cloud options are pricier, with flexible negotiations available for enterprises.
AWS IAM offers free access management, though cost comparisons with Azure can influence decision-making for some users.
Axiad Conductor offers affordable annual pricing with low-cost per-user licensing and efficient management, ensuring lower total ownership costs.
They are lower than some of their competitors.
Initial setups do not require significant capital expenditures, making it advantageous for organizations to utilize AWS services.
Azure is often chosen for cost-efficiency.
While it offers good value for money, a reduction in costs would be appreciated by any organization.
 

Valuable Features

Omada Identity provides governance, customization, integration, and automation for efficient identity lifecycle management with advanced reporting and strong API connectivity.
AWS Identity and Access Management enhances security and efficiency with multifactor authentication, customizable policies, and streamlined role-based access control.
Axiad Conductor simplifies authentication management with user-friendly features, efficient onboarding, and seamless integration, crucial for security compliance.
Technically, the product does everything one would expect from an identity and access management platform.
The solution enables differentiation in tasks, such as managing cross-account access, setting service roles, and integrating corporate directories for temporary AWS access.
Its role-based access control enhances security by allowing me to assign specific permissions to users, which helps in managing access and maintaining cost control.
Specific permissions can be given to users, allowing tailored access to instances and S3 buckets.
 

Categories and Ranking

Omada Identity
Sponsored
Ranking in Identity Management (IM)
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
User Provisioning Software (4th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (4th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd)
AWS Identity and Access Man...
Ranking in Identity Management (IM)
6th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Axiad Conductor
Ranking in Identity Management (IM)
58th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Authentication Systems (23rd), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (40th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (29th), Passwordless Authentication (9th), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (40th), Insider Risk Management (22nd), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of Omada Identity is 3.2%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Identity and Access Management is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Axiad Conductor is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Identity Management (IM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Omada Identity3.2%
AWS Identity and Access Management0.3%
Axiad Conductor0.1%
Other96.4%
Identity Management (IM)
 

Featured Reviews

Pernilla Hulth - PeerSpot reviewer
The interface is easy to use and gives you a solid overview
The cloud-based deployment was straightforward, but the on-prem deployment was in a highly complex ecosystem. Omada has matured since then. I wouldn't say that it isn't straightforward, but it depends on the customer. A standard deployment is relatively easy, but it can be more painful if you need a lot of customization. We deployed the cloud solution in around four months, nearly meeting the 12-week benchmark. The on-prem deployment took three years. It was a highly complex ecosystem that was dependent on other systems. Depending on the size of your environment, you need a product owner and some specialists for maintenance. My last customer was a university with a complex environment. They had around 12 people involved in maintenance at that organization. Typically, it's between 2-5 people.
SumitMundik - PeerSpot reviewer
IAM improves cloud security management with hybrid network capabilities and global role access
In AWS Identity and Access Management solutions, CloudFormation tools are used to create templates. Having predefined templates available from the AWS team would be beneficial. Currently, security teams work on policies and scripts for creating generic AWS Identity and Access Management roles. If AWS could provide an option to automatically create templates based on desired access requirements, it would be extremely beneficial, especially for documentation and troubleshooting purposes. Storage gateway creation has limitations, allowing maximum of 50 SMB file shares per gateway. While it is costly to access S3 buckets via AWS Identity and Access Management role through storage gateway, companies invest in this for enhanced data security, particularly in financial sectors where data integrity is crucial. There is an ongoing issue where files are sometimes sent twice to S3 buckets, despite MoveIt logs showing single transmission. As a workaround, Lambda functions are implemented with a five-minute delay before processing files to downstream applications.
Eric Brown - PeerSpot reviewer
The day-to-day tasks, running the servers, and making sure that everything is patched is all handled by the platform
The most valuable feature is the overhead management of the platform. There is less for my team to worry about. The day-to-day tasks, running the servers, and making sure that everything is patched is all handled by the platform. We just consume the service and work with them to refine it, making it even more valuable. Aside from Active Directory, anything that is a multi-factor platform is handled through Axiad Cloud. It is critical for helping to enforce usage of authentication devices across our organization. One of our requirements to continue some of our contracts is to have multi-factor authentication across all devices accessing the network. It is extremely easy to enroll a user with “One Click Issuance”. I have had very few calls to the service desk regarding enrollment. It takes a couple of minutes to enroll a user with "One Click Issuance". Deploying and managing authenticators is very easy, either done by a mobile application or enrollment of an OTP token. It is very simple. This is important to my userbase, which makes it important to me. Functionality-wise, it is pretty solid.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
No data available
Computer Software Company
18%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Non Profit
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise39
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise3
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Omada Identity Cloud?
As an administrator, we benefit from a lot of functionality that is available out of the box, but it is also configur...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Omada Identity Cloud?
They are positioned at a good price point. They are lower than some of their competitors.
What needs improvement with Omada Identity Cloud?
The biggest issue, which is the reason why we are transitioning from their product to SailPoint, is the overall user ...
What needs improvement with AWS Identity and Access Management?
In AWS Identity and Access Management solutions, CloudFormation tools are used to create templates. Having predefined...
What is your primary use case for AWS Identity and Access Management?
When attempting to access Windows UNC paths from MoveIt, it will request user ID and access. For instance, if ITS-Mov...
What advice do you have for others considering AWS Identity and Access Management?
The AWS Identity and Access Management Access Analyzer is not utilized in our implementation. The policy simulator fe...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Omada Identity Suite, Omada Identity Cloud
No data available
Axiad Cloud
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol Group, BMW Group, Deutsche Leasing
1. Amazon.com2. Adobe3. Accenture4. AT&T5. Bank of America6. Cisco Systems7. Coca-Cola8. Dell Technologies9. Equinix10. GE Healthcare11. Google12. Hewlett Packard Enterprise13. IBM14. Intel15. JPMorgan Chase16. Kroger17. LinkedIn18. Lockheed Martin19. Mastercard20. Microsoft21. Netflix22. Nike23. Oracle24. PayPal25. PwC26. SAP27. Siemens28. Spotify29. Tesla30. Toyota31. Visa32. Walmart33. World Bank
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Identity and Access Management vs. Axiad Conductor and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.