No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides cost-effective, flexible disaster recovery, reducing expenses, improving recovery times, and enhancing compliance efficiently.
Sentiment score
7.3
Organizations save 65%, reduce downtime, enhance data protection, and retain data cost-effectively with Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
Assistant Programmer at Mahadis
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
Senior Java Developer at J.P. Morgan
The solution has reduced the time required for backup administration and data recovery, saving several hours of IT effort each month.
Senior Technical Support Executive at digital track
We have reduced the time spent on backup management and incident resolution, allowing the team to focus on other strategic and operational tasks.
Technical Team Lead - Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
I have seen a return on investment as we have been able to save approximately 65% of our cost compared to the previous tool when we were using M365 for all users as our backup solution.
Full Stack Developer at BairesDev
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.3
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery's support quality varies, with mixed reviews on responsiveness, support plans, and reliance on third-party assistance.
Sentiment score
8.7
Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is praised for responsive support, intuitive interface, and local language availability, especially in Japan.
The customer support is amazing, and it is the best customer support I have ever had.
Head Of Product & Engineering (Cpto) at a real estate/law firm with 11-50 employees
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Assistant Programmer at Mahadis
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
The customer support for Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is very proactive and easy to access, 24/7.
Senior Network Engineer at KDInfotech
The support team has been responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful whenever assistance has been required.
Senior Technical Support Executive at digital track
The technical support from Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is excellent.
Microsoft 365 Konsult at Canmer Data AB
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is highly scalable, smoothly handling growth for enterprises with reliable upgrades and efficient resource deployment.
Sentiment score
8.7
Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup offers scalable, user-friendly solutions for growing businesses with flexible licensing and efficient management.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
Senior Java Developer at J.P. Morgan
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
Software Engineer at INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING
The scalability of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 10 out of 10.
Head Of Product & Engineering (Cpto) at a real estate/law firm with 11-50 employees
As the number of Office 365 users and data volume increases, the solution continues to provide consistent performance and reliable protection without adding significant administrative overhead.
Senior Technical Support Executive at digital track
Since it is a cloud-based solution, expanding protection for additional users and Microsoft 365 workloads is straightforward and does not require significant infrastructure changes.
Technical Team Lead - Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
If you are going to talk about scalability, it would really depend on the tenant size, considering we are dealing with 365, Teams, and SharePoint backup concurrency.
Storage Consultant Storage at Hewlett Packard Enterprise
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable and reliable, but some tasks may lag, and continuous data replication raises cost concerns.
Sentiment score
9.1
Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is praised for its stability, reliability, ease of use, and efficient Microsoft 365 data protection.
It is very good and very reliable.
DevOps Engineer at DivVerse Labs
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
Assistant Programmer at Mahadis
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
Senior Java Developer at J.P. Morgan
Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup has demonstrated strong accuracy and reliability in protecting and recovering Microsoft 365 data.
Senior Technical Support Executive at digital track
Overall, the platform has performed well, and its reliability is one of the key reasons we continue to use and trust the solution for protecting critical Microsoft 365 data.
Technical Team Lead - Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is stable, helpful, quick to adopt, easy to understand, and easy to implement, which makes my life easier.
Head Advisor Infrastructure Cloud Architect at Adrienutech
 

Room For Improvement

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery needs upgrades in automation, user interface, and monitoring for efficient disaster recovery operations and planning.
Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup requires better integration, user-friendliness, multi-platform support, and affordability for improved restoration and accessibility.
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
Software Engineer at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Because the replication is continuous and block-level, if a production server is hit by ransomware, the encrypted garbage data is often replicated to the DR site in near-real time.
Head Of Product & Engineering (Cpto) at a real estate/law firm with 11-50 employees
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
DevOps Engineer at DivVerse Labs
Feels slow compared to the speed in SharePoint or a browser.
Microsoft 365 Konsult at Canmer Data AB
Restores are search-based, and sometimes this is challenging as users, for example, do not remember what a file name or lost file is or when it was lost.
Full Stack Developer at BairesDev
Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup gives totally unlimited all parameters for OneDrive, SharePoint, email, and Teams.
Regional Pre Sales Engineer at Roundrobin Tech
 

Setup Cost

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides scalable pricing, though some users find it costly, especially regarding CloudEndure's backup fees.
Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup offers cost-effective, scalable licensing for comprehensive Microsoft 365 data security at £5 per user.
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
Software Engineer at INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING
pricing is fair, and you pay for the use.
Head Of Product & Engineering (Cpto) at a real estate/law firm with 11-50 employees
Barracuda stood out because its straightforward administration, strong Microsoft 365 coverage, and granular recovery features aligned well with our requirements.
Technical Team Lead - Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
It is around £5 per user, which could be pricey for big companies.
Microsoft 365 Konsult at Canmer Data AB
I chose 8 out of 10 because it cost-effectively backs up the entire M365 environment and retains backups indefinitely.
Full Stack Developer at BairesDev
 

Valuable Features

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery ensures efficient, cost-effective disaster recovery with seamless integration, continuous replication, and minimal downtime risk.
Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup integrates with Microsoft 365, providing secure, efficient backup and recovery with AI-driven threat detection.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
Senior Software Engineer at Thomson Reuters
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Software Engineer at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
Restoration allows me to recover a single file or a whole library or folder quickly, with the option to restore to either the original location or a new location.
Microsoft 365 Konsult at Canmer Data AB
It's now safer to move data to Microsoft 365 as we are now sure that the data is backed up, which frees up resources needed for an on-premises data center.
Senior Network Engineer at KDInfotech
It helps me worry less that in the worst-case scenario, mailboxes and Teams are easily restorable to continue with online learning at a very low risk.
Full Stack Developer at BairesDev
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
Ranking in Cloud Backup
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (9th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (9th)
Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Ba...
Ranking in Cloud Backup
12th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
SaaS Backup (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 1.3%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Backup Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery1.3%
Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup0.8%
Other97.9%
Cloud Backup
 

Featured Reviews

Kavya S - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
Continuous replication has protected critical servers and supports seamless disaster recovery drills
Some features that I personally feel can be improved are more simplified monitoring and reporting. As I previously mentioned, the console shows the replication status. If it had more detailed dashboards or built-in reports for DR readiness, it would make it easier for the teams to track everything in one place. Another improvement would be cost visibility and optimization guidance in optimizing the cost and also giving us visibility of it. Because the staging resources and replication storage are running continuously, it would be very helpful for organizations and users if AWS provided clearer cost insights, recommendations, and remediations to optimize the DR environment. It would also be useful if AWS added more automation options for application-level recovery, such as easier ways to handle IP changes, domain name system (DNS) updates, or application dependencies during failover. Additionally, we can simplify the setup and configuration process. For someone new to the service, understanding the staging settings, launch templates, and networking configurations can take some time. Setup simplicity and more detailed monitoring and alerting features would be beneficial. If we could add that, we can easily track the replication health, lag, and potential issues. Instead of relying on other additional tools for monitoring and alerting features, we can rely on AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery itself.
Esther Sultaana - PeerSpot reviewer
Storage Consultant Storage at Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Ransomware attacks have been contained and healthcare data remains accessible 24x7
When I used Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup, I liked it. I really did. I cannot think of anything off the top of my head that says this needs to be improved. If we are going to compete with Commvault or Cohesity, some improvements could be made. However, overall, for what we used it for within the healthcare industry, I think it is fine, especially with the ransomware resilience. You have the isolated recovery environment and zero trust backup architecture. These things really are critical for industries in healthcare. Everything that I mentioned, Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is for SaaS, so it covers all the bases. It is easily installed within five minutes or so. The cost is simple—you do not have any servers, storage, infrastructure, or maintenance, and it is strictly being used for what it is. Its compliance is competitive. Overall, I would say the cost is simple, you have Entra ID backups, deployment is quick, there is no infrastructure, ransomware protection is there, granular restore, and you have Azure region storage control. Where there is a problem is it does not have enterprise-level backup or multi-cloud workloads. It is best used for small and maybe mid-sized businesses, and I would say within healthcare in particular. It is for cloud-first companies, and only if you have M365 protection for MSPs, which is what NTT Data was. It works within that framework. However, for large enterprises, you do not want to look at it. I would recommend Rubrik or Commvault instead.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Construction Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?
The cost rating was assessed on a scale where 10 represented the most expensive.
What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?
There are areas that could be improved beyond the downtime issues mentioned, and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could enhance several aspects of its functionality.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been good and fine.
What needs improvement with Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup?
I think Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup can be improved by increasing the speed in the backup process.
What is your primary use case for Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup?
My main use case for Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is backing up Microsoft 365 data such as Exchange Online, SharePoint, emails, OneDrive, and Teams data. I used a SaaS-based application for back...
 

Also Known As

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery
Barracuda Cloud to Cloud Backup
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks
Delta Dental Plans Association
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.