We performed a comparison between AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software."The initial setup is pretty straightforward, it's not complex."
"Technical support has been very good. They usually respond quickly to our requests."
"It's on the cheaper side and not too expensive for users."
"The setup is pretty straightforward."
"For regular backup and restore solutions, this product is fine."
"It provides our disaster recovery solution. It works fine in our tests."
"The initial setup is really straightforward."
"The solution is dependent on the network bandwidth. For example, if they have a bandwidth of 10Mbps the solution will run a little heavier. If the bandwidth is good the solution runs well."
"Mature, resilient, and seamless database and server migration solution that's stable and scalable."
"The tool is automatic and makes migration easy."
"The solution's setup phase was straightforward."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Sometimes a server will get a bit behind. "
"The user interface, customer support, and the recovery time for the current customer query could use improvement."
"The UI could be a little sleeker."
"I would like to see better support for creating and working with archives."
"I set up a test, deleted the source, and went to fail it back, and it didn't work."
"The failback could be improved. It should be more intuitive."
"Definitely there should be better logging. From a customer perspective I would like to see more logs on what is happening. If there is an issue, I would like to know what the problem is. Right now, we have to depend on the support of the vendor to check and let us know, because we don't have access to a lot of logging information."
"The solution's network setup and a lot of the control tower setup could be improved."
"The product's cloud security could be improved. It also needs to improve its stability."
"The database schema conversion could be made more seamless for this solution. Widening the scope of features for database migration will also help."
"There is no monitoring support available in the solution."
"The documentation and videos could be improved, especially in the area of migration. Live videos would be helpful. There are very limited videos available."
More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Pricing and Cost Advice →
More AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is ranked 15th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 11 reviews while AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 5 reviews. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is rated 7.4, while AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery writes "Free, easy to use, and offers good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] writes "A cloud solution for operating and managing the AWS Server, EC2, and S3 bucket". AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is most compared with Azure Site Recovery, AWS Backup, Oracle Data Guard, VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery and Zerto, whereas AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] is most compared with Nutanix Move, AWS Application Migration Service and Carbonite Migrate.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
