AWS Device Farm vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Tricentis are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.4% mindshare in MTT, compared to Tricentis’s 25.5% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

AWS Device Farm

Read 2 AWS Device Farm reviews

519 Views
472 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 113 Tricentis Tosca reviews

18,376 Views
3,859 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

AWS Device Farm

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

Tricentis Tosca and AWS Device Farm are competitive products in automated testing. Based on feature comparison, Tricentis Tosca has the upper hand with its broad capabilities catering to extensive testing environments, whereas AWS Device Farm is more suited for mobile and web app testing due to its focus on device-specific testing.

Features: Tricentis Tosca offers scriptless test automation, model-based testing, and integration with DevOps tools. This makes it suitable for large-scale projects requiring comprehensive test suites. AWS Device Farm offers device and browser testing on real devices, a cloud-based testing service, and a seamless experience for mobile apps.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca integrates well with CI/CD pipelines and offers strong customer support for deployment. AWS Device Farm provides easy cloud-based setup and extensive online documentation but relies more on cloud convenience and scalability.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca has a high setup cost but offers long-term ROI with its extensive features. AWS Device Farm provides a flexible pricing model based on usage, which is cost-effective for projects focused on mobile and web testing with lower initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,286 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Device Farm

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (2nd), Functional Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of AWS Device Farm is 3.4%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 25.5%, down from 34.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tricentis Tosca	25.5%
AWS Device Farm	3.4%
Other	71.1%

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

AshishSingh11

Automation Test Lead at Cap Gemini

A stable solution used for malware testing and APM that needs to improve its performance

The setup phase was fine because AWS had given the whole tree structure on their website. So, basically, if we go here and there apart from that tree structure, it does not support it. So they have a very sophisticated tree structure. So that is the only tree structure that we have to follow. Else, there will be problems. I rate the setup process a seven out of ten, with ten being the easiest setup. Since I had to study the solution, it took me a week to properly deploy it. I just followed the instructions given by AWS to deploy the solution. So on their website, whatever the steps they had given, I simply kept on following it.

Read full review

reviewer2740515

Senior Software Engineer 2 at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automation test development becomes accessible and effective for functional testers

Tricentis Tosca is a codeless tool, making it easy for everyone to understand the transition of how to develop scenarios or test cases. In Tricentis Tosca, analyzing failures is straightforward because every time it fails somewhere, I get the screenshot, which helps me analyze how and why it failed. It has all the modules, including some pre-built ones that can be reused efficiently. Compared to other code tools such as Selenium, where I used to develop one script in one day, with Tricentis Tosca I can easily develop one script in four hours or three hours, saving four to five hours in a day.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like best about AWS Device Farm is that it offers actual physical devices that let you do more accurate testing because physical devices depict the live testing scenarios much better as opposed to emulated devices. AWS Device Farm is a pretty nice solution. Because it's an AWS service, you can use the CLI to tie in several steps that can create the pipeline, and run it efficiently. AWS Device Farm also gives you monitoring ability, observability, logging, etc., so I'm pretty satisfied with the solution."

"I rate the stability an eight out of ten."

"The product helps us to create very accurate test cases."

"This product contains a lot of functionality; it can provide all levels of testing from design to execution to reporting, and I like it because everything is available in one place."

"The customer service is top-notch."

"What I find valuable is that Tricentis is always refining the test methodology. They listen to feedback from the analysts about what the testing tool should do, and then Tricentis always implements it. So all the necessary testing functions are already implemented in their tools."

"Testcase design is most valuable, as it has helped in two different aspects, storing the test data in one place, and deciding how many test cases are needed for a given scenario using one of the inbuilt algorithms, thereby ensuring the test coverage."

"From the commercial tool perspective, Tosca is a leader in every aspect."

"The advantage of using Tricentis Tosca is that we can get started with automation without much investment on solution development, with it following a keyword-driven approach."

"Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"An area for improvement in AWS Device Farm is that it lacks a lot of features that would tie it in with other AWS services. The solution doesn't have great connectivity with other services offered by AWS, for example, AWS Secrets Manager. This should be improved because a lot of times, that missing functionality hampers the quality and engineering standards in terms of deploying the full AWS suite of services. What I'd like to see in the next version of AWS Device Farm is for it to link better, or have some type of enrollment that would tie it in with other AWS services, such as EventBridge, Lambda, Secrets Manager, and any other new service from AWS."

"An area for improvement in AWS Device Farm is that it lacks a lot of features that would tie it in with other AWS services."

"It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved."

"It may be different for other companies, but for us, establishing a set of procedures to get people trained was important."

"With the license stability, we have had a lot of issues. There were many interruptions to the connection and it took two-three weeks and we installed the license ourselves."

"They should have a different license policy for medium and small companies."

"Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation."

"It requires some coding customization that requires expertise, so having free services along with the licenses would be good."

"Exploratory testing engine needs improved element recognition (at lease in JAVA Swing)"

"Many times when we have raised a ticket, we did not get an urgent response."

"It would be of great help if they can fix the loading or performance issues."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Device Farm is an expensive service overall. You pay per device, and the cost for each device isn't cheap. My company paid for a device slot. It's a yearly subscription for a single device slot, so that's more cost-effective for my company. On a scale of one to five, where one is very expensive and five is very cheap, I'd give AWS Device Farm a two. It's on the more expensive side."

"Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back."

"Tricentis Tosca is not expensive at all."

"Pricing for Tricentis Tosca could be improved because it's very expensive."

"The price of the tool is a problem for a lot of Brazilian clients or Latino clients, as it is expensive. Where I work, if one is low price and ten is high price, I rate the tool's price as a ten out of ten."

"Pricing could be better."

"It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools."

"It is expensive. There is also the training cost, but it does speed up the process. So, you get a return on investment."

"In terms of the licensing costs for Tricentis Tosca, we are spending more or less $70,000 per year. We have a very complex mechanism because there are some business users and some BI users, so the licensing structure is not simple, but support is included."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Consumer Goods Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	72

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Perfecto vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 17% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 15% of the time

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 15% of the time

Eggplant Test vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 14% of the time

pCloudy vs AWS Device Farm

Compared 12% of the time

More AWS Device Farm Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 9% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 5% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 4% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

March 2026

Download AWS Device Farm product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

March 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

No data available

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

AWS Device Farm is an application testing service that lets you improve the quality of your web and mobile apps by testing them across an extensive range of desktop browsers and real mobile devices; without having to provision and manage any testing infrastructure. The service enables you to run your tests concurrently on multiple desktop browsers or real devices to speed up the execution of your test suite, and generates videos and logs to help you quickly identify issues with your app.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

NFL, Etsy, Tableau, Gannett, Miniclip, Allstate, Rainforest, goibibo, mysmartprice, Zillow

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca

March 2026

Free Report: AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Device Farm vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.