AWS Device Farm vs TestObject comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
1,378 views|743 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Sauce Labs Logo
80 views|36 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Device Farm and TestObject based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Mobile App Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Mobile App Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I rate the stability an eight out of ten.""What I like best about AWS Device Farm is that it offers actual physical devices that let you do more accurate testing because physical devices depict the live testing scenarios much better as opposed to emulated devices. AWS Device Farm is a pretty nice solution. Because it's an AWS service, you can use the CLI to tie in several steps that can create the pipeline, and run it efficiently. AWS Device Farm also gives you monitoring ability, observability, logging, etc., so I'm pretty satisfied with the solution."

More AWS Device Farm Pros →

"TestObject have released new capabilities that have helped us to provide a comprehensive solution to our end customers. Customers do not need to provide upfront investment in mobile devices as these are pretty costly."

More TestObject Pros →

Cons
"It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved.""An area for improvement in AWS Device Farm is that it lacks a lot of features that would tie it in with other AWS services. The solution doesn't have great connectivity with other services offered by AWS, for example, AWS Secrets Manager. This should be improved because a lot of times, that missing functionality hampers the quality and engineering standards in terms of deploying the full AWS suite of services. What I'd like to see in the next version of AWS Device Farm is for it to link better, or have some type of enrollment that would tie it in with other AWS services, such as EventBridge, Lambda, Secrets Manager, and any other new service from AWS."

More AWS Device Farm Cons →

"In a future release, we would like to have the ARML model included."

More TestObject Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AWS Device Farm is an expensive service overall. You pay per device, and the cost for each device isn't cheap. My company paid for a device slot. It's a yearly subscription for a single device slot, so that's more cost-effective for my company. On a scale of one to five, where one is very expensive and five is very cheap, I'd give AWS Device Farm a two. It's on the more expensive side."
  • More AWS Device Farm Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I rate the stability an eight out of ten.
    Top Answer:AWS Device Farm is an expensive service overall. You pay per device, and the cost for each device isn't cheap. My company paid for a device slot. It's a yearly subscription for a single device slot… more »
    Top Answer:It is slow. It is super slow. Performance is an area that can be improved. Whenever we upload our Zip files to that particular platform, you know, it takes quite some time, especially if the file is… more »
    Top Answer:TestObject have released new capabilities that have helped us to provide a comprehensive solution to our end customers. Customers do not need to provide upfront investment in mobile devices as these… more »
    Top Answer:TestObject is cost effective, especially from a test automation coverage perspective.
    Top Answer:In a future release, we would like to have the ARML model included.
    Ranking
    5th
    Views
    1,378
    Comparisons
    743
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    823
    Rating
    6.5
    9th
    Views
    80
    Comparisons
    36
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    310
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Device Farm is an application testing service that lets you improve the quality of your web and mobile apps by testing them across an extensive range of desktop browsers and real mobile devices; without having to provision and manage any testing infrastructure. The service enables you to run your tests concurrently on multiple desktop browsers or real devices to speed up the execution of your test suite, and generates videos and logs to help you quickly identify issues with your app.

    Everyone hates bugs. That’s why TestObject – an in-the-cloud, all-you-need testing tool – was founded in 2012. App quality has a major impact on your apps’ success but massive fragmentation of operating systems and mobile devices makes it hard for developers to test and guarantee the functionality of apps under different conditions. This is where TestObject comes to play. The company from Brandenburg, Germany provides a cloud platform with numerous real Android and iOS devices, accessible directly from your browser. Developers can upload their apps onto devices and see if and how they work. Along with the devices TestObject provides several testing tools to check the app’s functionality from all angles. Test more, worry less.

    Sample Customers
    NFL, Etsy, Tableau, Gannett, Miniclip, Allstate, Rainforest, goibibo, mysmartprice, Zillow
    BW Bank, Telefonica
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Insurance Company7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise69%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Mobile App Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Mobile App Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Device Farm is ranked 5th in Mobile App Testing Tools with 2 reviews while TestObject is ranked 9th in Mobile App Testing Tools with 1 review. AWS Device Farm is rated 6.6, while TestObject is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of AWS Device Farm writes " A stable solution used for malware testing and APM that needs to improve its performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestObject writes "Low-code testing platform used for API and visual testing as well as AI-based scriptless automation". AWS Device Farm is most compared with Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca, Kobiton Mobile Device Testing, OpenText UFT Digital Lab and pCloudy, whereas TestObject is most compared with .

    See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.