Avepoint FLY vs Nasuni comparison

Read 36 Nasuni reviews

9,184 Views
1,653 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Avepoint FLY

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Nasuni and Avepoint FLY are competing products within the enterprise cloud storage and data management category. Avepoint FLY appears to have the upper hand in terms of features, which are crucial for deploying larger enterprises, while Nasuni offers solutions with a focus on cost-efficiency.

Features: Avepoint FLY offers advanced migration capabilities, integration tools, and automation features that support seamless transitions to cloud-based systems. Nasuni focuses on scalability, comprehensive data protection, and security features that ensure seamless data access and protection across multiple cloud environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Avepoint FLY provides an agile deployment model and exceptional customer support, simplifying large-scale migrations. Nasuni offers straightforward deployment and extensive support, ensuring smooth implementation and ongoing management.

Pricing and ROI: Nasuni provides competitive pricing with predictable costs, contributing to ROI through efficient data management. Avepoint FLY requires a higher initial setup cost but offers substantial long-term ROI due to its superior features and integrations.

To learn more, read our detailed Avepoint FLY vs. Nasuni Report (Updated: August 2026).

Avepoint FLY vs. Nasuni

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Avepoint FLY

Ranking in Cloud Migration

5th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nasuni

Ranking in Cloud Migration

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File System Software (3rd), NAS (12th), Cloud Storage (14th), Cloud Backup (34th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (18th), Cloud Storage Gateways (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of Avepoint FLY is 3.5%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nasuni is 5.6%, down from 10.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Avepoint FLY	3.5%
Nasuni	5.6%
Other	90.9%

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

Dave H

Technical Support Specialist at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Effortlessly manages large-scale data migrations and improves cost efficiency

There were some areas that could be improved with Avepoint FLY, particularly regarding an issue with the final reporting. While I cannot remember the exact issue, it was related to the final report concerning which files were migrated and what errors occurred. However, this could have been a user problem rather than an application problem.

Read full review

SwapnilDaga

Infrastructure Architect at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Cloud data management that achieves cost efficiency with advanced data protection features

I am currently using Nasuni for seismic data. We have a huge data size, and we want to reduce costs. Nasuni acts as a caching solution, so we put some data into the cache, and the rest goes to the blob, which helps us save on costs. We use it for applications like Petrol and Tech Log, where 3D…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup phase can be described as a very user-friendly one...The solution's technical support was good since they responded very promptly."

"The solution is very straightforward to use. It's not overly difficult to figure out."

"If a company is looking for something that is easy to use and not too complicated, this is perfect."

"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

"Some of the best features with Avepoint FLY are that it is very easy to use, and the tool moves files quite quickly."

"The most valuable feature of AvePoint FLY is its ability to install or use multiple client servers using a single master server and balance the migration load depending on our needs."

"Nasuni gives us a single platform with a 360-degree view of our file data, which is very important to us. We have everything that we need to look at in a single pane of glass."

"My clients are happy with Nasuni because the transmission is seamless, and it consolidates all the existing file servers into one location. Also, Nasuni has no boundaries. It's infinitely expandable. They don't have to rely on the service provider for backup and restoration. It's self-serve."

"Using this solution has helped us to reduce the time it takes to recover data in the event of a disaster, lower our cost of operations, reduce our workload, and our savings through using Nasuni is approximately 35%."

"Nasuni has replaced multiple data silos and toolsets with a single, global file system."

"The snapshot functionality and the unified file system are definitely the most valuable features for us. The UFS allows everybody across the organization to see the exact same data at the same time, instead of having different file servers with different structures on them, and that's mission-critical. We have different branches throughout our organization that have to act on that data."

"The biggest and most impressive thing for us is the operational recovery (OR) and disaster recovery (DR) capabilities that Nasuni has. If a filer goes down, or an ESX server goes down, then we can quickly recover."

"We like Nasuni's snapshot technology. The snapshot and recovery features are the things we use most frequently. Ideally, I would recommend NFS or CFS, which gives you more benefits for clients or anyone who wants to access FTP protocol, FTP utilities, SAN, and MSS."

"We have less downtime and fewer trouble tickets from users who cannot access their shared files. Nasuni has reduced the friction and noise associated with file management because the devices are more reliable."

More Nasuni pros

Cons

"There were some areas that could be improved with Avepoint FLY, particularly regarding an issue with the final reporting. While I cannot remember the exact issue, it was related to the final report concerning which files were migrated and what errors occurred."

"The solution's reporting could be improved because it does not have a lot of reporting capabilities."

"Technical support is lacking in that they don't seem to respond. I do a lot of research myself. I can't rely on them."

"Right now, AvePoint FLY doesn’t provide us with help to identify the size of the mailed items for a certain period."

"The initial setup is a little bit more complex than setting up Cloud Backup for Avepoint."

"The Nasuni file storage platform doesn't work well when there are a high number of small files. This is the case when a directory structure contains more than 10,000 or 20,000 small files, e.g., 5 KB, 10 KB, or 15 KB. When the user is accessing these files from another geographical location, they might face a slow response or timeouts when connecting to the shares, and then to the files. This is because the file size is small. There is a scope of improvement with this solution when it comes to accessing a large number of small files."

"I would like to see Nasuni create a Dropbox or Box alternative. One of the things that people like about those tools is that they are very easy to implement. They look just like a file server. With Nasuni, you have to be online to get your file storage. With Dropbox, there is a thing running on your PC that downloads the files to it when you need them, i.e., an agent."

"I would say that they need to make their technical support quicker."

"Room for improvement would be the speed of replication of new files. I would also like to see cloud mirroring."

"Nasuni recently implemented a health system for filers. However, it needs better visibility because it lacks data and an explanation, or reasoning as to why a particular filer may be unhealthy."

"Its pricing can get a tad expensive."

"We can recover if data and a Filer are lost because of a possible ransomware event, but even that takes time to recover."

"The privilege settings need to be more granular, and alerts are an excellent example. If a user doesn't have access to them, they can't see them and access information such as what they may have done wrong, what's there, and when the last sync happened. However, the ability to view alerts also comes with permission to delete them, which is not good, so we need more customization options here."

More Nasuni cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AvePoint FLY's pricing is good enough for its capabilities."

"We are using the trial version and find it to be costly. It's something around $20. With another attachment, the cost was lower, at about $3. However, you seem to have to buy more licenses than you need."

"The prices of the tool are neither low nor high, so it can be considered a moderately-priced product."

"There are two different ways of licensing Avepoint FLY. So either you can use set up a licensing form based on objects which we do not recommend because then it will be more costly. So what you do is you set up the migration based on the users instead."

"With this solution, the license renewal is pretty swift. With the virtual appliance, you just need to take care of the OS versions and patches. In a way, we don't have to struggle much with renewals because the only thing that we need to take care of are the licenses. We renew it every three years. This aspect goes with infrastructural costs because it doesn't cost us too much to maintain the solution."

"The cost of licensing is negotiated and billed annually per terabyte."

"Nasuni should provide small-scale licenses, like a 20 TB license. Currently, the smallest is a 30 TB license."

"They could lower the cost, but it saves so much money when you go into it (by losing all the backup)."

"There are cheaper forms of storage, but Nasuni is fairly priced for the functionality it offers. I can get basic file shares provisioned in Azure and pay for the storage and the CPU. The overall cost would be much less than Nasuni, but I would need to build the management console and encryption process, so it would cost a lot to develop that kind of functionality."

"Its pricing can get a tad expensive. When we first took Nasuni out, we were just paying for the service. We got storage at a reduced rate. It has now changed, and they're now more of an all-in-one type of thing. It can be quite expensive, but it works out. Apart from that, licensing-wise, it's very simple."

"It has a license fee as well as hardware costs, which we would incur if we want to use Nasuni Cloud Storage Gateway for upgrades."

"Its price is fair and reasonable. I don't have anything negative about its pricing and licensing. For us, there is also the cost of monitoring. We are monitoring through Xenos and not through Nasuni. That is another cost for us from the monitoring perspective, but as far as Nasuni goes, we don't have any other cost apart from the licensing fee."

More Nasuni pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Avepoint FLY?

My experience with the pricing and setup cost of Avepoint FLY was that it is very competitive and fairly priced. It was significantly cheaper than some of the alternatives I was exploring, such as ...

What needs improvement with Avepoint FLY?

What is your primary use case for Avepoint FLY?

The migration I was involved in with Avepoint FLY was for an oil and gas industry, specifically from a file server to SharePoint Online, and we moved approximately two terabytes of data.

Does Nasuni have a good pricing model?

Based on the experience of my organization, Nasuni is definitely worth the money, since it gives you an all-in-one solution where you'd usually need several programs. About the cost, there isn't a ...

Is it easy to restore files with Nasuni?

As someone who has used this feature of Nasuni I can tell you - yes, it's good for file recovery and you'll definitely benefit from very quick times. I can't tell you if it's the best one because I...

What features and services does Nasuni offer?

Hi, if you pick Nasuni, you'll be benefiting from many services for a good price. Well, it's a personalized price you get after an agreement with the company but in my organization's case, it is a ...

Avepoint Migration Platform vs Avepoint FLY

Comparisons

Compared 22% of the time

SkyKick Migrate vs Avepoint FLY

Compared 15% of the time

Xillio Content Migration vs Avepoint FLY

Compared 15% of the time

DryvIQ Migrate vs Avepoint FLY

Compared 14% of the time

Import PST to Office 365 Tool vs Avepoint FLY

Compared 13% of the time

More Avepoint FLY Competitors

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 8% of the time

Panzura CloudFS vs Nasuni

Compared 5% of the time

Egnyte vs Nasuni

Compared 4% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

Datomia vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

More Nasuni Competitors

Product Reports

Avepoint FLY

Download Avepoint FLY product report

Download Nasuni product report

Overview

AvePoint FLY is a migration platform designed to streamline transitions for businesses by offering efficient tools for data transfer and project alignment with organizational goals.

AvePoint FLY specializes in facilitating seamless data migration for companies involved in mergers, acquisitions, and SaaS transitions. It effectively retains metadata, identifies file path issues, and maps projects. Users appreciate its ease of use, rapid file transfers, stable performance, and adaptable operations, making it advantageous for large-scale data movement.

What are the key features of AvePoint FLY?

Master Server Management: Install multiple client servers with one master server.
Load Balancing: Optimize migration load distribution effectively.
Metadata Retention: Maintain complete metadata during transfers.
Pre-Migration Assessment: Evaluate data before starting migration.
Path Length Identification: Detect and address file path length issues.
Project Mapping Tool: Align migration projects with business objectives.

What benefits should users expect from AvePoint FLY?

Ease of Use: Simple, user-friendly interface enhances migration efficiency.
Rapid File Transfer: Speeds up data transfer processes significantly.
Scalability: Supports large datasets without impacting performance.
Operational Flexibility: Offers adaptable migration methods and schedules.

AvePoint FLY is extensively implemented in industries such as oil and gas, facilitating significant dataset migrations from servers to cloud platforms like SharePoint Online. It is crucial in merging IT frameworks during acquisitions, automating transitions from Slack to Teams, and migrating email systems to Exchange Online, significantly aiding Managed Service Providers.

AvePoint

Nasuni provides a robust platform for seamless global file storage, offering unified file management, data protection, and cost-effective scalability.

Nasuni's approach integrates a unified file system with high-level security features, ensuring seamless data access and synchronization. Despite its strong capabilities in data replication and storage, Nasuni faces challenges in integration and small file performance. Users appreciate its scalability and cost reduction but call for enhancements in cloud mirroring, automated load balancing, and multi-factor authentication. Better content visibility, mobile access tools, and refined monitoring are desired to enhance user experience. Organizations utilize Nasuni for global file sharing, disaster recovery, and collaborative data management across distributed teams, effectively replacing older systems.

What are Nasuni's Key Features?

Seamless Data Transmission: Enables efficient data flow across locations.
Unified File System: Centralizes file management for ease of access.
Unlimited Storage Capacity: Offers scalable options with global access.
Data Protection: Continuous versioning and ransomware protection.
Single Management Console: Streamlines administrative tasks.

What Benefits Can Users Expect from Nasuni?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure expenses by leveraging scalable architecture.
Data Accessibility: Enhances sync and access across multiple sites.
Improved Collaboration: Supports teamwork across dispersed teams.
Confidence in Data Security: Comprehensive encryption and private key management.

Nasuni is adeptly used in industries requiring robust data management such as finance, healthcare, and media, where file synchronization and disaster recovery are critical. Enterprises deploy it to replace outdated file-sharing systems, enhancing workflow efficiency and data reliability.

Sample Customers

Pure SEO

American Standard, CBRE, Cushman & Wakefield, E*TRADE, Ithaca Energy, McLaren Construction, Morton Salt, Movado, Urban Outfitters, Western Digital

Avepoint FLY vs. Nasuni