Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Auvik and Kaseya are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Auvik is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while Kaseya is ranked #77. Auvik holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 216 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

18,634 Views
12,485 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

2,887 Views
2,454 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Kaseya Traverse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Kaseya Traverse and Auvik Network Management compete in the network management space, each offering distinct advantages tailored to specific organizational needs. Auvik Network Management appears to have the upper hand due to its emphasis on streamlined functionality and user experience.

Features: Kaseya Traverse provides comprehensive network monitoring, advanced problem resolution, and extensive reporting capabilities. Auvik Network Management offers automated network mapping, real-time monitoring, and efficient bandwidth analysis, providing a more intuitive management experience. Auvik's emphasis on automation and ease of use gives it an edge in feature comparison.

Room for Improvement: Kaseya Traverse could benefit from more intuitive user experience, streamlined deployment processes, and enhanced customer support resources. Auvik Network Management might improve in offering more detailed reporting features, expanding third-party integrations, and providing more customization options in its user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Auvik Network Management's cloud-based deployment and proactive support model ensure quick, hassle-free setup combined with extensive customer support resources. In contrast, Kaseya Traverse offers a robust deployment model that may require more time for full implementation and user training, resulting in Auvik's deployment simplicity and responsive customer support being significant advantages.

Pricing and ROI: Kaseya Traverse is recognized for its scalable pricing structure that can result in initial cost savings but may lead to higher long-term investments. Auvik Network Management usually involves a higher upfront cost but offers superior ROI through long-term operational efficiency and minimized downtime, making it a worthwhile investment for businesses seeking comprehensive network management solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Kaseya Traverse

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,109 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

4th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

216

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Network Troubleshooting (1st), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

77th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

53rd

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	1.2%
Kaseya Traverse	0.6%
Other	98.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

AmanThakkar

Software Engineer at Titanslab Inc.

Network automation has reduced troubleshooting time and supports faster issue resolution

The biggest and best feature I have experienced with Auvik Network Management (ANM) is automatic network discovery, along with features such as topology map, instant alerts, real-time monitoring, easy remote access, and simple dashboards. Among those features, I find automatic network discovery to be the most useful because it gives a clear picture of the entire network without having to create manual diagrams. It is very easy to use Auvik Network Management (ANM), so even a new team member can quickly understand the network because everything is displayed in a very clear way. Auvik Network Management (ANM) has positively impacted our organization by reducing troubleshooting time, improving network visibility, providing a very clear picture, and helping us support multiple client networks and environments very efficiently. We have noticed a 35 to 40% improvement in troubleshooting speed, less manual work in documenting any network system, faster responses to network issues, and better uptime with the client networks.

Read full review

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Auvik is a fantastic network monitoring tool that does everything PRTG does, plus all the things that SolarWinds and CM did."

"We like the alerts, the network mapping, and the backup of configurations."

"The stand-out feature is the automated config backup on networking devices. This automation is handy in a bind when a machine crashes, and you need to pull the config out of Auvik."

"The cloud monitoring portion of Auvik that provides visibility into each piece of my infrastructure is the most valuable feature."

"The TrafficInsights feature not only shows me network bandwidth usage without the need for expensive, in-line traffic decryption, but it gives me which device is using the most traffic. It ranks devices by which are using the most CPU, memory, storage, and it keeps those up to date, non-stop."

"Auvik's visual mapping and search features have been very useful. We can locate precisely where each device is on the map."

"I love that Auvik can automatically back up the configuration of switches and firewalls."

"Credential management is the most valuable feature. It's helpful to have everything in one essential place."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"In terms of most valuable features, we are happy with everything so far, and maybe in a year's time I'll have a different opinion on what can change, what can be better, but for now it's the perfect solution."

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."

"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."

"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

Cons

"The user interface could be less cluttered."

"I want to be able to customize the layout more in terms of showing the alert timeframes. For example, I would like to customize it to show all the alerts in the last three hours, six hours, etc. You should be able to customize it so that it shows you the most critical information. We don't need to see CPU usage. We only want to see the up and down time. It would be nice to filter out many of those metrics we don't use."

"Although the network topology is excellent, it has a hard time picking up some devices on the network. A device might not be fully supported, or Auvik is unable to pull all the information from it."

"Auvik's notifications could be better."

"It would be beneficial if Auvik Network Management (ANM) made it possible to change or manipulate the interface, specifically the network interface of desktop devices."

"Customer support could be better, as I mentioned earlier. I haven't had to reach out for a while, but when I have, it took a minute to get to someone who could help or who knew what I was talking about."

"Auvik Network Management (ANM) can be improved with better reporting options."

"The network mapping is just okay when I consider what I would typically see in a network map... that whole overview map in a single pane of glass can be pretty messy and a little bit of a performance hog on computers. The network mapping needs improvement in Auvik, as a whole."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."

"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."

"The support for the solution needs some improvement. In my experience, the response time to answer a query is slow."

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

"With my most recent experiences on the solution, I can say that it isn't currently stable; there are a lot of glitches and bugs and the reliability just isn't there right now."

"Reporting is a bit difficult."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to Auvik's competitors, its pricing is largely in line with SolarWinds."

"I understand Auvik's value proposition, but the retail price might seem high at first glance."

"Auvik's pretty good in terms of pricing. It can get pricey if you have multiple managed devices, but if it's just a simple network with only one or two firewall walls and smart switches, it's reasonable."

"Auvik is fairly priced. The cost is what we expected considering network management. The benefits outweigh the cost for us."

"Auvik is a good product for the price. The license is reasonable. We took a chance on it and figured it would work for us. It did even more than we expected."

"It's always been very affordable."

"Auvik's pricing model is good."

"I don't know how much the solution costs, but the fact that we've moved almost all of our customers over to it means it must be worth the value. Our platforms are costly, but we switched to Auvik, so the company must see it as cost-effective."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,109 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	156
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is average. The cost is typically higher for these kinds of tools, so it is moderate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) can be improved with better reporting options. While there are options for reporting, having more clarity would be helpful, along with more advanced analytics and mor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

Our main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is to monitor and manage the client networks, helping us to track the network devices and identify issues quickly to monitor the performance and...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaseya Traverse?

If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kaseya Traverse?

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. As Kaseya sellers, we always promote Kaseya first. If the price is more competitive, then I think it will be better. It's a main pain point for us as a resel...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 4% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 4% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

September 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

September 2026

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

Kaseya Traverse offers sustainable functionality for comprehensive network, server, and application monitoring. It supports full IT stack visibility with strong processing capabilities and an intuitive interface.

Designed for businesses needing robust remote monitoring, Kaseya Traverse handles networks, servers, and applications with ease. It ensures comprehensive management with features like automated workflows, effective troubleshooting, remote support, and detailed inventory reporting. Despite user concerns about development speed in reporting and support, absence of a CMDB, and integration issues, it remains a popular choice for managed service providers. Utilized primarily for remote maintenance, patch updates, and antivirus management, it connects customer endpoints to manage infrastructure efficiently.

What are the key features of Kaseya Traverse?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Supports network, server, and application oversight.
Robust Processing: Manages multiple devices and infrastructures seamlessly.
Automation Workflows: Simplifies management tasks and improves efficiency.
Remote Support: Offers effective tools for troubleshooting and assistance.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures easy navigation and accessibility.

What benefits should users expect from Kaseya Traverse?

Increased Efficiency: Automation and remote capabilities streamline processes.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides a complete view of IT infrastructure.
Improved Troubleshooting: Quick identification and resolution of issues.
Cost Management: Despite pricing concerns, it supports competitive offerings.

Managed service providers leverage Kaseya Traverse for monitoring data centers and cloud environments across industries. It's particularly effective in networking, storage, and server management for enterprises, offering configuration assistance and link monitoring to optimize operations.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Kaseya Traverse

September 2026

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Kaseya Traverse

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,109 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Kaseya Traverse report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.