Aurea CX Process vs No Magic MagicDraw comparison

Aurea and Dassault Systèmes are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Aurea is ranked #23, while Dassault Systèmes is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5. Aurea holds a 1.9% mindshare in BPD, compared to Dassault Systèmes’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aurea users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Dassault Systèmes users who would recommend it.

Aurea CX Process

Read 1 Aurea CX Process review

1,480 Views
651 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

No Magic MagicDraw

Read 19 No Magic MagicDraw reviews

2,489 Views
2,290 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Aurea CX Process

No Magic MagicDraw

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Process and No Magic MagicDraw based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi, Microsoft, Camunda and others in Business Process Design.

To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Design Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 904,748 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aurea CX Process

Ranking in Business Process Design

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (43rd)

No Magic MagicDraw

Ranking in Business Process Design

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Aurea CX Process is 1.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of No Magic MagicDraw is 2.4%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
No Magic MagicDraw	2.4%
Aurea CX Process	1.9%
Other	95.7%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Hardik Chavda

Savvion (BPM) J2EE Developer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Facilitates development flexibility and easy customization

Flexibility of development. Developer can use various JavaScript APIs for development. Most (or all) of the components are plug and play. Customization is easily achievable most of the time As mentioned above, it is more flexible than other products available in the market. Performance. More…

Read full review

reviewer2080611

System Engineer at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

Ease of use and real-time collaboration empower effective teamwork and streamlined development

For CAMEO, it's not only the ease of use, it's versatility, its communicability, but Rhapsody is the worst tool I've ever used. It is very difficult, not user-friendly, and very expensive. It works only with its IBM counterparts. SPARX Enterprise Architecture is very easy to use, but it's limited. It gives you an idea of how your model is developing, so this feature helps maintain integrity or correctness of system models. It's really a good feature to have. You've got to have the simulation toolkit installed to be able to do that, and that works really well. The MagicDraw or CAMEO system is good on its own, but it should be integrated and should come out of the box with the simulation toolkit because there are some things you can't do without it, making it very difficult to have to look for another license to be able to do that. I would prefer that it come with the simulation toolkit.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Flexibility of development; the developer can use various JavaScript APIs for development and most or all of the components are plug and play, so customization is easily achievable most of the time."

"When you look at it, No Magic is an all-encompassing tool; you can use it for business architecture design, for deploying an ERP system across your enterprise, for managing new product development from cradle to grave, and it enables you to generate a digital model of your product or service solution that can be run through simulations and tested before you spend a single penny on bending metal or configuring a new ERP software application, resulting in massive cost savings."

"My advice to anybody who is designing complex projects, like defense projects or space projects, is that they have to use this program or one like it."

"Offers good standards compliance and is user-friendly."

"The beauty of MagicDraw is that it has a simulation part, so you can simulate your model to validate it. The simulation allows you to bring in code off of an external code that you can write to set up the simulation and execute the code."

"The most valuable features with No Magic MagicDraw are its ease of use; you can put this in front of a 12-year-old and they would know what to do right away."

"Magic Draw has capabilities that I'm sure I haven't even touched on, but at least for what I'm attempting to achieve, it provides the most capability to meet my needs at this point in time."

"The MBFC capability of MagicDraw is higher than the other competitors."

"No Magic MagicDraw provides a lot of good features on functionality."

More No Magic MagicDraw pros

Cons

"Yes, the servers are not as efficient as required."

"When I am working with my Mac and I right-click to copy and paste, it doesn't work."

"The licenses are expensive compared to similar tools. At the moment, the user is open to using MagicDraw if it's 15% more than other solutions. If it were to cost any more, they wouldn't use it."

"They don't really support code engineering, and that's why we have to move to Enterprise Architect. MagicDraw is stuck at C++03 standards, whereas most C++ programs today want to use the latest definition of the C++ standards. We were at C++11, and we wanted to do code engineering with C++11 or 17, but they didn't support it. That pushed us into a different tool, which is Sparx Enterprise Architect."

"The documentation for MagicDraw and the video tutorials compared to other competitors is an area for improvement."

"It would be better if the User Interface were updated. At the moment, it's a classic environment. It reminds me of the old Windows interface, for example, Windows 95. It would be better to make it more user-friendly. It would also be better if it could integrate with SAP solutions. It isn't easy to find experts in the field. It's hard to find people around the globe that have the necessary skills and expertise to manage this solution. For example, in our case, we needed someone with refrigeration knowledge that also knew how to use the tool, and that was a challenge. We also had issues relating to erasing. Sometimes, it kept it in the background and didn't erase it at all. We had to review the entire list to ensure that the item was deleted."

"There's lots of documentation. They process multiples of guides. They've got all kinds of guides and documentation out there, but it's kind of hard to find. There are a lot of videos. You can go to YouTube and find videos on how it's been used in different ways, but it just kind of scratches the surface."

"For the next releases, I would like to have them import requirements from other sources. They could make it very easy to do that because there are a lot requirements management tools like DOORS, D-O-O-R-S, Dynamic Object Oriented Management. A lot of folks use DOORS to create a requirement. For those requirements you allocate them to a component in the architecture and a verification method for that requirement. It would be good if we could import those into MagicDraw as components so you don't have to manually do these things."

"The technical support is not very good."

More No Magic MagicDraw cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"In addition to the initial cost, you have to pay annually for support in order to get the upgrades."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis, and it's expensive."

"I would say licensing would be anywhere from $3,500 to $6,500 per person or per seat (it's a per seat style license)."

"I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. It is an expensive product compared to software for model-based system engineering."

"The price of No Magic MagicDraw could improve. The price of the solution is too expensive for smaller-sized companies. There should be a better pricing model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for No Magic MagicDraw?

Maybe the price is a little bit high for a small company to acquire this tool. However, they offer trial versions and trial licenses for members of INCOSE.

See all answers

What needs improvement with No Magic MagicDraw?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for No Magic MagicDraw?

I deal with DOD lifecycle acquisition sorts of things as some of the main use cases currently, and I expect to continue using it for more than 25 years.

See all answers

Comparisons

ARIS BPA vs Aurea CX Process

Compared 15% of the time

Bizagi vs Aurea CX Process

Compared 9% of the time

CMW Tracker vs Aurea CX Process

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Aurea CX Process

Compared 7% of the time

More Aurea CX Process Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 18% of the time

Visio vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 13% of the time

Visual Paradigm vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 8% of the time

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 7% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 3% of the time

More No Magic MagicDraw Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

July 2026

Download Aurea CX Process product report

Buyer's Guide

No Magic MagicDraw

June 2026

Download No Magic MagicDraw product report

Also Known As

CX Process Enterprise, Savvion BusinessManager, Savvion Process Modeler

MagicDraw

Overview

Aurea CX Process provides robust tools for automating and optimizing business workflows, enhancing efficiency and decision-making capabilities within organizations.

Designed for enterprises seeking to streamline operations, Aurea CX Process offers a powerful suite for managing complex workflows. Its capability to automate tasks and offer deep insights into processes allows businesses to respond swiftly to market dynamics and customer demands. Seamless integration further aids its versatility, making it a suitable choice across industries looking to improve process management.

What are the essential features?

Workflow Automation: Automates intricate business operations to increase efficiency.
Process Monitoring: Offers real-time tracking and analytics to refine processes.
Integration Support: Easily integrates with existing systems to enhance usability.
Customization Options: Allows tailored configurations to meet specific business objectives.

What benefits should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Automation reduces manual intervention, optimizing performance.
Improved Decision-Making: Access to detailed analytics informs strategic choices.
Quick Adaptation: Enhances ability to respond to changing business environments.
Cost Savings: Streamlined processes lead to reduced operational costs.

Implementation of Aurea CX Process varies across industries, with finance sectors employing it for compliance management while manufacturing focuses on production processes. Retailers benefit from optimized supply chain operations. Its customization and integration capabilities allow industries to tailor its use to their specific needs, ensuring relevance and impact.

Aurea

No Magic MagicDraw is a powerful modeling tool recognized for its flexibility and integration capabilities, especially suited for enterprise modeling and systems engineering. Featuring a user-friendly interface, it supports diverse modeling architectures with tools for testing and simulation.

Renowned for its compliance with OMG standards, No Magic MagicDraw excels in offering comprehensive modeling options that support model-based systems engineering. Its rich feature set enables digital model creation aimed at testing and simulation, backed by a strong suite of integration tools. The tool facilitates program management integration with systems engineering, making it suitable for complex enterprise projects. However, suggestions for improvement include a redesign for a more intuitive interface and enhanced documentation. Licensing costs are higher compared to competitors, and integration requests include compatibility with SAP and modern C++ standards.

What are the most important features of No Magic MagicDraw?

Flexibility: Adapts to different modeling needs and architectures with ease.
User-friendly Interface: Simplifies access and usage for modeling tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with tools like Doors.
Standard Compliance: Aligns with OMG standards.
Traceability: Maintains visibility across project changes.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from No Magic MagicDraw?

Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent technical support.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates model-driven documentation and teamwork.
Strategic Efficiency: Streamlines processes, reducing time in business transformation projects.

No Magic MagicDraw is widely deployed for tasks including business transformation, system architecture modeling, and supporting defense programs, proving invaluable in enterprise and system modeling. It aids in strategy integration, process design, and offers extensive features like simulations and lifecycle engineering.

Dassault Systèmes

Sample Customers

Air France-KLM, Proximus, Barratt Developments, Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage

Northrop Grumman, Labcorp, Deposco, ClearView Training, IT Services Promotion Agency, Intelligent Chaos, Metalithic Systems Inc., Sodifrance

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

July 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi, Microsoft, Camunda and others in Business Process Design. Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.