AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Asigra comparison

Asigra and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Asigra is ranked #70, while Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.8. Asigra holds a 0.5% mindshare in BRS, compared to Amazon Web Services (AWS)’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Asigra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users who would recommend it.

Asigra

Read 20 Asigra reviews

826 Views
801 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Read 20 AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery reviews

2,403 Views
1,129 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Asigra

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Asigra and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offer competing disaster recovery solutions. Asigra leads in pricing and support, while AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is preferred for its robust features, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Users highlight Asigra's comprehensive data protection, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is praised for its scalability, seamless integration with AWS services, and extensive feature sets.

Room for Improvement: Asigra users suggest improvements in reporting capabilities, better integration options, and enhanced user experience. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery users desire a more user-friendly experience, faster initial setup, and greater customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Asigra is noted for straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, though powerful, requires more complex initial setup but is backed by extensive AWS support resources.

Pricing and ROI: Asigra is valued for its cost-effectiveness and solid ROI. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery involves higher upfront costs but offers substantial long-term benefits. Users recognize Asigra for affordability while viewing AWS as a long-term investment.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Asigra Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Asigra

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Asigra

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

70th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (16th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Asigra is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery	0.7%
Asigra	0.5%
Other	98.8%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Alfaz Khan

Technical Team Lead at Eldama Technologies

Plenty of useful feature and reliable

We use Asigra for backups I have found all the features useful in the solution. I have been using Asigra for approximately two months. The solution is stable. The six people in our IT department are using the solution. The initial setup was a medium difficulty level. Some parts were complex…

Read full review

reviewer2774796

Data Governance System Specialist at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Disaster recovery has strengthened critical grid operations and maintains regulatory compliance

A couple of things where AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could improve are the granular testing of OT workloads. It would be helpful to have fully isolated test recoveries for our OT data, such as SCADA or pole telemetry, without impacting replication, to help validate disaster recovery readiness more frequently. Additionally, advanced reporting and analytics would be beneficial. If the tool could provide more built-in dashboards to show replication lag trends, failover readiness, or system dependencies, it would save time and improve transparency for both field teams and regulatory reporting. In terms of integration, tighter integration with our asset management systems and GIS databases would streamline automated recovery of linked OT systems and data relationships, making failover more efficient. There should also be more fine-grained alerts for replication lag or orchestration failures, with customizable thresholds for different types of workloads to improve proactive incident response. My advice would be to start with a clear disaster recovery strategy. Identify which IT and OT systems are critical, calculate the recovery time objective, and which assets need replication first. Keep latency-sensitive or legacy OT systems on-premises while replicating core IT workloads to AWS for fast, reliable failover. It is essential to keep testing failovers regularly, as it builds confidence and uncovers gaps that help ensure smooth operation during real incidents. Actively monitor costs by paying attention to replication storage and compute usage since AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is pay-as-you-go, which allows us to save thousands of dollars annually. Connecting disaster recovery events with field operations, SCADA systems, and asset management dashboards streamlines operational responses. The AWS team is great, and engaging with their support and architects, along with their documentation and best practices, is very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have found all the features useful in the solution."

"It has helped us to provide comprehensive data protection with high recovery rates and a malware scanning feature."

"The solution has been very stable."

"The agentless architecture has minimized our software footprint at the client level."

"The setup is pretty straightforward."

"The solution is dependent on the network bandwidth. For example, if they have a bandwidth of 10Mbps the solution will run a little heavier. If the bandwidth is good the solution runs well."

"AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery has allowed us to maintain critical operations during high-impact natural disasters, protecting both our customers and our assets while demonstrating measurable improvements in our response time and regulatory compliance."

"Technical support has been very good. They usually respond quickly to our requests."

"Since it is a managed service, I reduce my time to manage infrastructure and applications."

"I appreciate the automated orchestration of recovery processes in this solution, especially integration with Route 53 and automatically using Route 53 to switch to a different region directly."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward, it's not complex."

"Since deploying AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, we have mostly seen an improvement in uptime, which contributes to reducing downtime."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pros

Cons

"They should improve the malware scanning capabilities, extending it to protect cloud application data."

"The management could be a bit better."

"Since I have to view everything on the console, the previous application solutions like IBM and Sanavi showed the RPO and RTO status directly. In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status."

"The user interface, customer support, and the recovery time for the current customer query could use improvement."

"I have not seen any areas that need improvement at this time."

"The UI could be a little sleeker."

"We believe that customer support for AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery needs to be improved because although we do raise tickets, the response can take some time."

"There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost."

"Sometimes a server will get a bit behind. "

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Asigra could improve, it is expensive. We have purchased an annual license."

"Asigra is priced competitively, but requires technical expertise to operate, optimize, and maintain its services."

"I feel the product's pricing is a good value. Licensing is pretty straightforward."

"It has saved us money from having to buy hardware for disaster recovery."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"I rate the price of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery a six out of ten."

"We were happy with the pricing that they gave us."

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."

"The pricing is better now that they had come out with the Tier 2 which replicates a little less often. In comparison to what I would have been spending with any other type of solution, the pricing is fair."

"Where the price adds up, there are CloudEndure licenses, then there is the AWS environment, and finally, there is the AWS storage, so cumulatively, it adds up."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

16%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Government

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a fairly stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

The pricing has been fine, and regarding the setup cost as well, it is quite fine. There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery can be improved through regular drills to ensure that all resources are properly prepared for disasters with scheduled drills. This includes testing and understanding ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Asigra

Compared 32% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Asigra

Compared 21% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Asigra

Compared 18% of the time

Barracuda Backup vs Asigra

Compared 16% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs Asigra

Compared 13% of the time

More Asigra Competitors

Azure Site Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 17% of the time

AWS Backup vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 13% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 11% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Data Guard vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Asigra

January 2026

Download Asigra product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

January 2026

Download AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery product report

Also Known As

No data available

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery

Overview

Asigra makes award-winning enterprise backup and recovery software that leads the industry in secure, reliable, manageable and affordable data protection. Asigra Cloud Backup works in the cloud or on-premise, for everything from mobile devices to entire data centers.

Asigra

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

British Red Cross, Special Olympics, London and Capital, L and K Bennett London, The Commonwealth, Hanrick Curran

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Asigra

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Asigra

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Asigra and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Asigra report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.