We performed a comparison between Aruba Instant and Omada Access Points based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The solution is stable."
"The coverage of the solution is great."
"The central management of multiple devices is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"If you don't need heavy-duty filtering and things like that, it's a cheap solution. And, you have central management, and it works."
"Aruba's mobility features, which facilitate seamless switching between wireless access points, are also quite impressive. Users don't even notice the transition, ensuring a smooth and uninterrupted experience."
"Has many advanced features: Built-in firewall, local radius, application visibility and control, not locked into support agreements."
"The deployment is easy."
"The most valuable feature of Aruba Instant is its cloud capability, which allows us to manage it through the cloud."
"The product is easy to configure."
"The initial setup is not complicated."
"We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi."
"The solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology."
"Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its price."
"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."
"Its sturdiness and cost-effectiveness are the most valuable features."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"The price could be better."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"The solution is expensive."
"They could offer a new model for access points that are outdoors."
"Aruba Instant is a simple and scalable solution that works well, but the costs you incur from access points could be cheaper."
"It would be better if Aruba Instant could provide more security for customers."
"They could provide a centralized system to manage switches incorporated into multiple branches."
"I think that the next release should offer IP phone security/firewall."
"I think they're missing roadmaps to the partners and the customers. They're releasing the products, but there are no quick updates to the partners and the customers."
"Technical support needs improvement. We use the forum for technical support assistance, but it's not enough. If you're talking with a technician, they're in India. They cannot give you the service that you need. Sometimes have problems with some personal services and technical support is not helpful in this area."
"It uses a different portal and has limitations from the customer side as it's not refined for MSP."
"It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable."
"Aruba has better scaling capabilities."
"The solution takes a long time to switch to another connection, which should be improved."
"There should be more remote support for the mobile application."
"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."
"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."
"Upgrading the hardware capabilities to newer versions like Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7 would be a helpful improvement."
"There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Instant is ranked 6th in Wireless LAN with 42 reviews while Omada Access Points is ranked 16th in Wireless LAN with 13 reviews. Aruba Instant is rated 8.6, while Omada Access Points is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Aruba Instant writes "A highly stable and easy-to-deploy solution that is free and provides excellent deployment guides". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Omada Access Points writes "Reliable solution, fast deployment and easy to scale". Aruba Instant is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ubiquiti WLAN and Mist AI and Cloud, whereas Omada Access Points is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Cisco Wireless. See our Aruba Instant vs. Omada Access Points report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.