Huawei Wireless vs Omada Access Points comparison

Huawei and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Huawei is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.9, while TP-Link is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.6. Huawei holds a 6.3% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Huawei users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Huawei Wireless

Read 36 Huawei Wireless reviews

4,596 Views
4,504 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

3,354 Views
3,320 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Huawei Wireless

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Huawei Wireless and Omada Access Points are significant players in the wireless access point market. Huawei's competitive pricing and extensive features slightly edge out Omada, especially in larger scale deployments, while Omada is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and suitability for small to medium enterprises.

Features: Huawei Wireless includes seamless roaming, cloud integration, and high-stability with Wi-Fi 6. It is noted for its affordability and ease of configuration. Omada Access Points are valued for their reliability, ease of use, and integration with centralized systems, enhancing business operations and network control.

Room for Improvement: Huawei Wireless needs better support services, improved interoperability with third-party systems, and SMB-targeted solutions. Omada Access Points could benefit from better scalability, more robust security features, and enhanced advanced management tools to cater to various industry needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Huawei Wireless provides both on-premises and public cloud deployment with simple configuration and strong support, though response times could improve. Omada is noted for its easy on-premises setup and consistent customer support, despite some feeling the technical response could be quicker.

Pricing and ROI: Huawei Wireless is more affordable than competitors like Cisco and does not require recurring license fees, offering a good return on investment for larger installations. Omada stands out for low initial costs and the absence of additional subscription fees, providing a budget-friendly solution for smaller businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,778 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Huawei Wireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Huawei Wireless is 6.3%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 4.1%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Huawei Wireless	6.3%
Omada Access Points	4.1%
Other	89.6%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Fahad Doguwa

Deputy Manager at Central Bank of Nigeria

Affordable platform with efficient analytics features

Huawei adapters have facilitated seamless integration with mobile devices, extending the LAN's reach. Additionally, including CampusInsight, a component offering analytics and visibility into wireless connectivity, has proven invaluable. This feature enables us to monitor network health and troubleshoot user-related issues efficiently. The reliability has had a positive impact on our operations. I advise others to go for Cisco if cost is not a factor. Otherwise, they can explore other options based on the availability of that OEM within the country. We have Huawei present in our country and provide all the necessary support, so we went forward with them. I rate it a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Prasad Wijesooriya

IT Manager at Hala Equipment Trading LLC

Well-suited for mobile and portable device usage but issues with stability

The problem is that when the number of users increases, TP-Link automatically drops the speed, and in terms of coverage, it falls short. We are not using any industrial-level equipment or accuracy. We are looking for something at the industrial level, advanced Access Points, not the basic ones from TP-Link. Omada Access Points could be improved in terms of connectivity and speed. That is the main thing. The other thing is security. Currently, most people are sharing their passwords, allowing unauthorized users to access Wi-Fi networks. So, the main areas for improvement are security, accessibility, and speed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can use an access point to broadcast multiple SSIDs, assign dynamic VLANs, and configure dynamic access control lists (ACLs)."

"That would be more of engineering at this point. I'm from more of the business side. It's pretty much doing the standard installations with portal integrations and integrations with the Mac."

"The solution's roaming feature is very nice. When you move to another place it automatically changes the access point. It's one of the most valuable features."

"When opening the radio, we manage the frequency to handle overlapping effectively."

"All of the features are valuable in Huawei Wireless."

"The solution is very user-friendly and easy to use."

"It is easy to set up."

"I am impressed with the tool's seamless integration."

More Huawei Wireless pros

"Omada is easy to manage, has cloud management features, and is easy to set up."

"We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi."

"The most valuable feature of TP-Link Auranet EAP is its high performance."

"We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisfied with Omada's performance as an engineer."

"This product is easy to use."

"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."

"The performance and availability of Omada Access Points have met our business needs, particularly in improving network control and facilitating direct access for developers to branch services."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"The speed could be a bit better."

"The scalability could be a bit better."

"The manageability could be improved."

"The solution should offer more integration with third-party servers and devices."

"While technically proficient, enhancing communication skills would greatly benefit the customer experience."

"The solution needs to include a captive portal."

"As such, there are no problems. It has been good. There were some issues with the network design, but that is not specifically related to the product. We had to make some improvements in the network design. The product as such is fine, and there are no big issues. We are using the latest version having most of the features available in the industry, so the specs are very high. If something new comes up new in the industry, it needs to be incorporated into the product."

"The security of the solution could be better in the future."

More Huawei Wireless cons

"There should be more remote support for the mobile application."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."

"The price of the solution is an area requiring improvement since I want the solution to be made available at a cheaper price than its current market price."

"TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it."

"It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable."

"Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not monthly. It is a kind of perpetual licensing. We pay once depending on the kind of services we need to deliver. There are no licensing fees."

"I would rate them something, like, eight to nine, on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Right now, my company made a one-time purchase of Huawei Wireless. It depends, but in most of the projects where customers buy hardware with some software, it's a one-time purchase. Customers pay a yearly fee for other projects for support and additional software features, such as email protection firmware updates for cybersecurity. You'll also receive information about the latest attacks and get more protection if you pay an additional fee apart from the standard license fee. You'll also get an additional warranty for Huawei Wireless, a yearly contract."

"I pay monthly for the solution."

"Huawei Wireless is one of the cheapest options in the marketplace."

"The price of Huawei Wireless is reasonable. The licenses are active, and everything is working fine as per the license agreement."

"We don't have any control on the pricing. This comes from Huawei in India. Pricing-wise, Huawei is very aggressive and competitive if you compare them to competitors, like Cisco, Aruba, and Ruckus. The Indian Huawei team tells us, "Just pick up the order and design the infrastructure. If there are any pricing challenge, we'll work on that and we will try to match things 100 percent.""

"It is very cost-effective."

More Huawei Wireless pricing and cost advice

"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

"TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Which wireless solution would you choose - Huawei or D-Link?

Huawei wireless is a strong and solid product that has a lot of features - and for all that it offers, it happens to be very cost effective. As a wireless solution, it is simple and its user interf...

See all answers

What do you like most about Huawei Wireless?

The reliability has had a positive impact on our operations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Huawei Wireless?

For SMB customers with limited wireless users, Huawei Wireless may not be suitable due to the lack of multiple access points and the need for a centralized SSID. However, for large-capacity custome...

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

D-Link Wireless vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 15% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 14% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 14% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 4% of the time

More Huawei Wireless Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 17% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 15% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

NETGEAR Insight Access Points vs Omada Access Points

Compared 5% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Huawei Wireless

October 2025

Download Huawei Wireless product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

October 2025

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

Huawei WLAN

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Huawei WLAN products are compatible with 802.11a/b/g/n/ac standards to establish high-speed, secure, and reliable wireless network connections for indoor and outdoor applications.WLAN products can be used in enterprise offices, schools, hospitals, large shopping malls, exhibition centers, airports, and more.

Huawei

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Anhui Agricultural University (AAU), China Everbright Bank

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points

September 2025

Free Report: Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Huawei Wireless vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.