We performed a comparison between Arcserve UDP and Nutanix Disaster Recovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a very stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Our customers are happy with the product’s functionality."
"Instant recovery is the most valuable feature of Arcserve UDP."
"I would recommend it if there is a general case."
"The recovery part of the product is very good."
"The most valuable feature of Arcserve UDP is live replication."
"I like the tool's speed."
"The standard backup and restore feature is most used."
"The product is very simple and very easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is the reliability and scalability of being able to swing our workloads across the country."
"Nutanix Disaster Recovery needs to have a feature that can automate manual tasks."
"Nutanix Disaster Recovery can be used for snapshots, backup, and disaster recovery."
"Every time I change the disc, I have to do a full backup."
"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. It can be difficult to assign destinations and choose which files and folders we need to back up. There are some aspects that are unclear."
"Licensing is an area that needs improvement."
"A lot of their new technologies are not very good."
"The support could be more knowledgeable and faster."
"Its interface can be improved. I find it unintuitive."
"The technical support of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution can use a lot of bandwidth when the scheduling is not done, it should auto-schedule itself. For example, if there are 50 users connected in the network at 12 o'clock and the backup is not scheduled. At this time the network offices are going to have performance issues when it is doing a backup. Having a feature to auto-schedule a time when the network is not being used often would be beneficial."
"Nutanix Disaster Recovery needs to have a feature that can automate manual tasks."
"The solution should include a standard license for the object level and file level."
"The product must allow users to create a production domain on the main site in one hypervisor and a backup site on another."
"The solution's bandwidth utilization can be improved further."
Arcserve UDP is ranked 9th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 41 reviews while Nutanix Disaster Recovery is ranked 16th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 4 reviews. Arcserve UDP is rated 7.6, while Nutanix Disaster Recovery is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Arcserve UDP writes "Global deduplication, stable, and flexible licensing options". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Disaster Recovery writes "A reliable and scalable solution that can be used to ensure workloads are replicated when needed". Arcserve UDP is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Acronis Cyber Protect, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), Veritas Backup Exec and Rubrik, whereas Nutanix Disaster Recovery is most compared with Zerto and VMware SRM. See our Arcserve UDP vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
