Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Nutanix Disaster Recovery Logo

Nutanix Disaster Recovery Reviews

Vendor: Nutanix
4.3 out of 5

What is Nutanix Disaster Recovery?

Featured Nutanix Disaster Recovery reviews

Nutanix Disaster Recovery mindshare

As of September 2025, the mindshare of Nutanix Disaster Recovery in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category stands at 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Nutanix Disaster Recovery0.7%
Veeam Data Platform20.8%
Commvault Cloud13.1%
Other65.4%
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

PeerResearch reports based on Nutanix Disaster Recovery reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryDisaster Recovery (DR) SoftwareSep 18, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersSep 18, 2025Download
ComparisonNutanix Disaster Recovery vs HPE Zerto SoftwareSep 18, 2025Download
ComparisonNutanix Disaster Recovery vs Veeam Data PlatformSep 18, 2025Download
ComparisonNutanix Disaster Recovery vs Commvault CloudSep 18, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
HPE Zerto Software4.510.3%98%341 interviewsAdd to research
VMware Live Recovery4.17.1%88%81 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
24%
University
10%
Real Estate/Law Firm
10%
Mining And Metals Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Retailer
5%
Pharma/Biotech Company
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Insurance Company
5%
Construction Company
3%
Government
3%
Logistics Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
Manufacturing Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Financial Services Firm
2%
 
Nutanix Disaster Recovery Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
VMware Administrator at Infosys4.0I've used Nutanix Disaster Recovery for four years and appreciate its platform integration and efficient failover, though support responsiveness and replication speed need improvement. It's stable, scalable, and overall, I’d rate it eight out of ten.
Virtualization consultant at SaH Analytics4.0I utilize Nutanix Disaster Recovery to safeguard our infrastructure from catastrophic failures, benefiting from its automated failover workflows and network switching. While improvements are welcome, there's currently no significant issue. ROI is subjective, and alternatives like VMware are costly.
Senior Infrastructure Manager, Information Technology at Pediatrix5.0We utilize Nutanix Disaster Recovery for its reliable and scalable features, providing peace of mind for workload replication across locations. We saw ROI after switching from a cumbersome VMware solution, appreciating Nutanix's simplicity despite needing better bandwidth utilization.
Assistant VP, Information Technology at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I use Nutanix Disaster Recovery for application purposes, valuing its local storage feature for improved performance. While early in use, I suggest improvements in the dashboard and configuration clarity. Previously, I used Cisco and considered VMware.
Technical Manager at PT.Password Solusi Sistem3.5I primarily use Nutanix Disaster Recovery for physical to virtual integration, finding its snapshot, backup, and disaster recovery features valuable. However, it needs standard licensing for object and file levels. While we also use Veeam, Nutanix excels without alternatives.
Senior operations manager at Orange4.5We use Nutanix Disaster Recovery for compliance as it helps us duplicate data and take backups. However, it would benefit from a feature that automates manual tasks. We haven't considered other solutions or deployment options.
Infrastructure Team Lead at eSkyIT4.5Our customers utilize Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a backup or disaster recovery site. It's straightforward to manage, but it requires the same hypervisor for both sites, limiting flexibility in creating production domains on different hypervisors.