HPE Zerto Software vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery comparison

HPE Zerto Software vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery

Download the complete report

Helped 902,417 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

1st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

357

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Backup (2nd), Autonomous Operational Resilience (1st)

Nutanix Disaster Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

21st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 5.9%, down from 10.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is 1.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE Zerto Software	5.9%
Nutanix Disaster Recovery	1.6%
Other	92.5%

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2802231

Dev Ops Engineer at a media company with 201-500 employees

Near-zero downtime has protected critical workloads and now simplifies hybrid cloud recovery

The best features of HPE Zerto Software are mainly very sophisticated and relevant to the current market. The data protection CDP part has real-time replication, unlike other solutions that have snapshot backups. We can set it up hourly, making it ideal for use with workloads. Another attraction is the near-zero RTO, with automated failover within minutes and one-click failover and failback. Currently, we are using a hybrid cloud solution, and HPE Zerto Software supports multi-cloud environments, making it easy to migrate between on-premises and cloud. Regarding the impact of HPE Zerto Software on our RTOs, we have near-zero RTO, meaning the system must be back online within thirty minutes if we measure the time. It is very quick to recover services. With HPE Zerto Software's near-synchronous replication, we have some CDP protection, so we typically write interceptions along with some asynchronous replication. There is almost real-time replication available.

Read full review

Vijay-Patel

Technical asst. at a educational organization with 501-1,000 employees

Integrated backups and orchestration have protected critical workloads with zero downtime

Pricing is always a consideration because nowadays the price has increased a lot. We bought our system five years ago and we paid in advance, so we are not yet affected by the price increase. However, we are planning to buy another solution in the very near future because the old one is now phasing out. We are planning to buy a replacement of the existing infrastructure and we are facing a lot of cost issues because they increased the price. Previously it was per socket. Now they moved to per core with many other restrictions. Our experience over the last five years has been very positive, but nowadays we find that Nutanix support is degraded. They started reducing their support. Their new functionality is not as stable. Nutanix has added Kubernetes cluster creation, segmentation, and micro-segmentation. Even their support people are not fully knowledgeable. Their support people are trained for VM-based systems, but now their own internal services are running using Kubernetes and containerization. Their support staff does not have enough knowledge to provide proper support. This may be a transition period where a lot of new functionality has been added and the support staff is not yet well acquainted with it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Using Zerto to get them back up and online was a lifesaver."

"It's easy to install."

"Zerto offers a much better user experience and has reduced our disaster recovery time by at least fifty percent."

"A new feature is the One-To-Many VPG allowing a VM to be replicated at up to three different locations, including local."

"The most valuable features are the continuous streaming, that it takes very little CPU usage — it doesn't affect production — and the recovery time is very short."

"The migration capabilities are very good."

"The time it takes to fail a server over to DR has been great."

"What I appreciate the most about Zerto is the simplicity of it all."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is the local storage solution, which significantly boosts performance, especially when transitioning from traditional architecture."

"The initial setup of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is straightforward and easy."

"The product is very simple and very easy to use."

"Nutanix Disaster Recovery can be used for snapshots, backup, and disaster recovery."

"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is the reliability and scalability of being able to swing our workloads across the country."

"Nutanix Disaster Recovery needs to have a feature that can automate manual tasks."

"The main benefits I've seen from using Nutanix Disaster Recovery include its single platform, which is significantly better than VMware, offering improved security, scalability, and multiple communication options."

"For the last five years, we have had zero downtime."

Cons

"Its price should be improved."

"HPE Zerto Software needs improvements regarding its dependence on storage vendors; the rising hardware prices lead to numerous vendors entering the market, and HPE Zerto Software must enhance its API integrations continuously as new storage vendors emerge across different geographies."

"If I have to reboot a virtual machine host, I have issues with Zerto catching up afterward. That's about the only thing I would say needs improvement. Sometimes, when I have to do maintenance, Zerto takes a little bit to catch up. That's understandable."

"They should not make it so expensive so that I can buy more of it."

"There needs to be more flexibility in the licensing."

"Sometimes we require extra storage for Zerto."

"To improve HPE Zerto Software, I would suggest that the upgrade process is a little bit average and challenging at the moment, rather than necessarily adding features."

"I need to get up to the latest version so I can move my journals to a particular LUN, saving them with a particular storage altogether, rather than with the virtual machine. This is not available until I upgrade, and I need to upgrade all my hypervisors. This would be something that would be nice to have if it could be used on older versions."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

"The product must allow users to create a production domain on the main site in one hypervisor and a backup site on another."

"Nowadays we find that Nutanix support is degraded. They started reducing their support."

"The dashboard could be a bit refreshed, and some configuration parts could be less confusing."

"The solution should include a standard license for the object level and file level."

"The solution's bandwidth utilization can be improved further."

"The major issue with Nutanix is its appliance-based model, which can lead to vendor lock-in."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While we find the twenty-five VM license somewhat inflexible, the actual setup costs are minimal as the product is so easy to install."

"It is an enterprise-grade product. When you buy enterprise-grade tools, you have to expect to pay a higher price. It goes back to the idea of you get what you pay for."

"The product's pricing is the one area where it is less competitive."

"Compared to other options like SRM, Zerto is a more expensive solution, making it primarily suitable for larger organizations."

"There is a lot of confusion with Zerto licensing. They have a migration license and a replication license. They should simplify the licensing process. The migration license costs a lot of money, and it is only on a one-time basis. If you use that license, it ties to that VM. I might re-migrate that VM in the next five to ten years. It is another environment, but my license is stuck there. The replication license is fine, and I have no issue with its pricing model, but they should simplify the migration license."

"Zerto is reasonably price for the product that you're getting. We keep on buying more licenses, so it's a good price."

"It's very equitable, otherwise you wouldn't do it. It's something that we utilize for the licenses per core as far as what we're backing up. Therefore, it's very cost-efficient as far as the licensing goes. For the amount of stuff that we're backing up and what we're utilizing it for, the licensing is not very expensive at all."

"I'd like to see better tiering for Zerto's pricing. We do multi-tier VMs. I don't think I should be paying a penalty and price for a tier-three VM where I don't need a really tight SLA like I do for a tier-one."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

"Nutanix Disaster Recovery is a cheap solution."

"The solution’s pricing is good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	93
Midsize Enterprise	93
Large Enterprise	204

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is good.

What needs improvement with Zerto?

I believe HPE Zerto Software can be improved by providing more clarity on roadmap features coming.

What needs improvement with Nutanix Disaster Recovery?

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Disaster Recovery?

We are already working with Veeam but we don't have the product under subscription. We have a perpetual license. We are using it for virtual machine backup. We have an on-premise HCI setup and we a...

What advice do you have for others considering Nutanix Disaster Recovery?

Both solutions have their merits. If we have to take a replication backup on the DR cluster, then Nutanix Disaster Recovery product is better. However, when we are planning outside of the cluster b...

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Comparisons

Compared 9% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 2% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

VMware Live Recovery vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery

Compared 9% of the time

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery

Compared 5% of the time

Rubrik vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery

Compared 5% of the time

Datto Cloud Continuity vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

More Nutanix Disaster Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

HPE Zerto Software

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Nutanix Disaster Recovery

Download Nutanix Disaster Recovery product report

Also Known As

Zerto Virtual Replication

No data available

Overview

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Nutanix Disaster Recovery offers reliable, scalable solutions that simplify management and enhance security. With seamless failover and efficient storage, it outperforms competitors like VMware. Its unified interface reduces downtime and facilitates effective multi-cluster management.

Nutanix Disaster Recovery stands out for its robust features, including automated network switching, local storage efficiency, and enhanced security. The platform excels with Prism Central's orchestration capabilities that support multi-cluster management. Deduplication and redundancy safeguard data, while integration with physical and virtual environments ensures efficient replication and backup operations. Areas for improvement include better bandwidth utilization, advanced automation, and clearer configurations. Cost concerns and declining support quality also warrant attention, especially with newer functionality changes affecting stability.

What are the key features of Nutanix Disaster Recovery?

Reliability and Scalability: Ensures system resilience and adapts to growing needs.
Seamless Failover: Provides uninterrupted operations during outages.
Automated Network Switching: Streamlines network adjustments for efficiency.
Local Storage Efficiency: Optimizes space with deduplication techniques.
Prism Central Orchestration: Facilitates easy management of multiple clusters.

What benefits should be considered in reviews for Nutanix Disaster Recovery?

Enhanced Performance: Minimizes downtime and boosts productivity during disruptions.
Data Security: Provides robust protection with redundancy and recovery protocols.
Efficient Management: Simplifies site management with a unified interface.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces storage costs through deduplication and optimized resources.

In industries with critical infrastructure, Nutanix Disaster Recovery supports replication and backup needs. Organizations use it for hot and cold data centers, ensuring data compliance and infrastructure resilience. Applications include physical to virtual integration and orchestrated backup through scheduled asynchronous replication, enhancing overall reliability in sectors like healthcare and finance.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Information Not Available

HPE Zerto Software vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery