Arcserve UDP vs N-able Cove Data Protection comparison

Arcserve and N-able are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Arcserve is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.0, while N-able is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.0. Arcserve holds a 1.2% mindshare in BRS, compared to N-able’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Arcserve users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of N-able users who would recommend it.

Arcserve UDP

Read 43 Arcserve UDP reviews

2,566 Views
2,207 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

N-able Cove Data Protection

Read 23 N-able Cove Data Protection reviews

3,743 Views
2,134 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Arcserve UDP

N-able Cove Data Protection

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Arcserve UDP and N-able Cove Data Protection are two prominent products in data protection solutions. Arcserve UDP seems to have the upper hand due to user satisfaction with its customization options and file recovery speeds.

Features: Arcserve UDP users highlight strong backup capabilities, deduplication, and disaster recovery features. N-able Cove Data Protection users favor easy integration with other tools, robust cloud backup, and automated backup processes.

Room for Improvement: Arcserve UDP users suggest better scalability, a more intuitive setup process, and enhanced instructions. N-able Cove Data Protection users point out the need for enhanced reporting tools, a more responsive support team, and better initial instructions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deployment of Arcserve UDP is straightforward but could use clearer instructions. Users find the customer service responsive and knowledgeable. N-able Cove Data Protection is easy to deploy, with many users noting smooth cloud adoption but a slower response time from customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Arcserve UDP users find the pricing reasonable and the ROI high due to reduced downtime and efficient data recovery. N-able Cove Data Protection users report higher initial costs but justify them with robust features and strong ROI from streamlined operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Arcserve UDP vs. N-able Cove Data Protection Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP vs. N-able Cove Data Protection

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,140 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arcserve UDP

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

19th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (11th)

N-able Cove Data Protection

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

29th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (17th), SaaS Backup (8th), MSP Backup (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Arcserve UDP is 1.2%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N-able Cove Data Protection is 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

TeresitaSabile

Head of Operation and IT at Elgrade Inc

Cost savings and efficient decompression but needs better cloud integration

Our primary use case for Arcserve UDP is its decompression feature, which helped us save money by reducing storage needs. Despite moving to cloud applications, we have been using Arcserve UDP for backup and disaster recovery Arcserve UDP has helped our organization save considerable amounts of…

Read full review

Per MøllerJacobsen

Senior consultant at Azend A/S

Delivers cost-effective data backup with room for search improvements

The challenges I face especially are those I've mentioned, that finding some specific data in N-able Cove Data Protection is not as easy as it is in some other systems. You cannot just search for something—you need to know where it was and when it was there to restore it, plus it would be nice to take out data from Microsoft 365 in some portable format, which is currently not an option. I would like to extract the data from Microsoft 365 in a portable format, something like a database or maybe just to take out a PST file or SharePoint and Teams files to the file system. Especially in these times, where we discuss potential risks with the Microsoft cloud for European companies, companies would want to know how to access their data from the backup if they suddenly don't have a tenant. I believe there should be the ability to take out data from Microsoft 365 in a portable format. I know that Cohesity is working on making such a thing. It's not there yet; I asked last week for something for forensics, and the support team said it's not possible yet, but I know from our technical account manager they are working on some solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product is extremely user-friendly and it is capable of performing large-scale archive/backup (five+ years worth). It is easy to store, maintain, and check backups."

"It is a very stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The most valuable features are that it is able to restore quickly and that it is able to virtually restore on Hyper-V."

"There are many backup options available in this solution. For example, you are able to do backups of servers, email, OST files, and users. This is a complete backup solution which is very good."

"We are satisfied with Arcserve UDP. The most important feature that we use and why we choose this product is the RHA feature."

"The solution has no limitations because it does backup for Linux and Windows."

"Arcserve UDP has a good configuration and user interface. It makes the job of an administrator easy."

"Instant recovery is the most valuable feature of Arcserve UDP."

More Arcserve UDP pros

"What I like the most about it's the ease of use and the reliability that it has when copying information to the cloud."

"The most valuable aspect is the added protection of having a cloud-based backup service. It provides redundancy in case of data loss."

"The ease of use and the console are great."

"The user interface is the most valuable. It gives us the ability to check everything. With more than 100 endpoints running that software, I like the ability to quickly check that everything is working correctly. That's one of the biggest selling points."

"The most valuables feature is the alerts and monitoring that catches the failed backups."

"For starters, this is one of few databases that allow us to backup MySQL databases, most others only support Microsoft SQL. This solution also has a very user-friendly interface accessed through a web browser. Additionally, backups can be easily configured through N-able Backup."

"The most valuable feature by far is the Virtual Disaster Recovery. On top of that is the bare-metal recovery. The recovery options that we have are great. We have tested the Virtual Disaster Recovery and the bare-metal recovery in just about any scenario you can think of. We have even restored bare metal, a full server, to a laptop, and had full functionality. It's just insane how well it works and how simple it is. It does most of the work for you."

"The monitoring makes it very easy to check whether a backup has gone bad."

More N-able Cove Data Protection pros

Cons

"One of the biggest drawbacks of Arcserve UDP is that it does not have a single console, making it an area that needs to be considered for improvement."

"The speed of restores should be improved. We have found the speed of large restores rather slow."

"It takes much time to verify and consolidate images for backups."

"I had an issue with Arcserve UDP during the failover and the secondary machine didn't get back online, even though it ran automatically. I faced the issue during a crisis situation. However, I haven't faced such a problem again."

"The solution's reporting could be improved and should provide customized reports."

"Licensing is an area that needs improvement."

"They could work on their marketing approach. I don't see many people leveraging it."

"We could not go into granular details of retrieving backup information."

More Arcserve UDP cons

"A feature I'd like to see would be a more customizable admin console."

"The recovery side, the restore side, could be a little more optimized."

"We don't use the solution’s automated recovery testing because SolarWinds made me cross. When they released it, I went, "Oh, well, that's quite good." Because if you use the system, then it supposedly spins up, and on the portal, it gives you a screenshot of the booted device. So, I phoned up, and I said, "Oh, that's really quite cool. How much is that?" They said, "No, no, no. It's all included in your license." I went, "Okay then," and went and deployed it on about half the fleet. One of the options that our customers have is they can pay us a small amount every month for us to test the recovery just to prove that it's viable, and I thought, "Well, this will do that for us. Nice." Then, in the next invoice, we got a charge for it. While It was not a huge amount, I took offense at the fact that we were told that it would be a no extra cost option that was part of our license, but it turns out that it's chargeable. Therefore, we haven't used it since."

"Integration with a hybrid cloud is something that I found complicated."

"N-able Cove Data Protection does not provide a lot of SaaS backup products, which is an area they can improve. Additionally, there are some limitations on the storage side, where I cannot have a lot of employees backing up their data."

"For the MSP side, they could have more of a "security user" that can go in and only see certain clients. If you give somebody access as a technician, they can see all the clients."

"The one thing they don't are Linux servers, it's Windows only. I understand that directive. I have another product that I use for our Linux servers and stuff, but it would be nice if they had that flexibility on the Linux side. I understand the development and the world is geared towards Windows in 365, I know that's where the clienteles are and the business and the money is."

"A better default view on my dashboard would be great. There is a lot of useless information there that it pulls up. They could present the dashboard slightly better, in terms of the extra information after the first five columns. The first five columns are awesome. After that, I don't care about the rest, and there are another seven things after that."

More N-able Cove Data Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is priced well compared to other solutions."

"The solution is expensive."

"The price of StorageCraft ShadowProtect is competitive in the market."

"It is a bit pricey, considering the reliability problems. If the tool worked flawlessly, the price would be fair, even cheap."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"In comparison to other vendors, it is a low-cost solution."

"The price is based on the number of sockets. We use a four-socket price that includes two servers and the cost is $4,375."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a four or five out of ten."

More Arcserve UDP pricing and cost advice

"When you have a device/appliance on the site quite a lot of the other enterprise class backup people insist that you have their appliance, which is frankly offensively expensive. Because when you pry the top off, it's just a standard 19-inch tin box with a standard Intel I5 in it, some RAM, and a hard drive. Then, you go, "Why have they just charged me 5,500 quid for a box, which I could have probably build for under 500." Whereas, with the SolarWinds product, they don't have that. The backup appliances that we have onsite are just plain cooking PCs. We can build our own machines, which is reflected in the price that we can offer a customer."

"I believe that the price is very reasonable in comparison to other options. It is cheaper than both Redstor and Acronis and, since we are now using our own on-premise cloud, there is absolutely no comparison since we have unlimited storage rather than paying per gigabyte used for their onsite storage. We are currently able to backup fifty computers for the same price that we use to backup five computers."

"Cove only takes the data you have on the physical server. I can back that up for long periods of time, and I don't accrue high charges to have the data in the cloud. It stays at one rate. This allows me to forecast payment for the next one or two years and show clients their estimated growth."

"The only option I would like to see is an adjustable scale. Right now we have 250 seats and we're not using all of them. It would be nice to be able to save that little bit of money by being able to buy just what we need."

"The pricing is affordable. N-able Cove Data Protection has a direct-to-cloud architecture, but it also allows saving backups locally without extra storage costs."

"The price isn't extreme, but I'd love to pay less."

"There is no per node cost, at least not the way I am doing it. I am on bulk. New customers can be set up on a trial, where they can get things all squared away, then they can switch over to being a billed customer."

"N-able Cove Data Protection is an averagely-priced product."

More N-able Cove Data Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Non Profit

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Major Differences Between These 4 Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions?

Comparing the features of the four is not the right approach. You need to develop a list of requirements for backup and DR that are specific to your organization and then compare each of the four ...

See all answers

What do you like most about StorageCraft ShadowProtect?

The interface is very refined, works fine, and is very intuitive most of the time. Scalability is nice. The multi-tenancy feature is very welcome. The integration with Linux works fine too.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StorageCraft ShadowProtect?

Pricing for SPX MRP/MSP is under $400 per server (Single VM) with a 1-year subscription. After discounts, it could decrease by 20%-30%, and opting for a 3/5/10 server pack may offer even better (lo...

See all answers

What do you like most about N-able Backup?

The initial setup of N-able Cove Data Protection was very easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N-able Backup?

In terms of pricing, N-able Cove Data Protection is neither cheap nor expensive compared to other competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N-able Backup?

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 32% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 10% of the time

Rubrik vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 10% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 5% of the time

Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 5% of the time

More Arcserve UDP Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 13% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Synology C2 Backup vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 8% of the time

NinjaOne vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Boxafe vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More N-able Cove Data Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP

August 2025

Download Arcserve UDP product report

Buyer's Guide

N-able Cove Data Protection

August 2025

Download N-able Cove Data Protection product report

Also Known As

StorageCraft ShadowProtect, StorageCraft Backup Analyzer

N-able Backup, SolarWinds Backup, SolarWinds MSP Backup & Recovery, SolarWinds MSP Backup

Overview

Arcserve UDP is a comprehensive solution that empowers even a one-person IT department to protect virtual and physical environments with a high degree of simplicity. It allows you to design and manage your entire data protection strategy with a unified management console, and enables you to scale your data backup coverage as your organization grows with the push of a button.

Arcserve

Cove Data Protection, from N-able, is a comprehensive solution designed to safeguard critical business data. It offers a range of features including backup and recovery, disaster recovery, and endpoint protection. With automated backups and flexible scheduling options, it ensures data is protected and easily recoverable.

The solution also includes advanced security measures such as encryption and ransomware detection to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches. Cove Data Protection provides seamless integration with various platforms and offers centralized management for efficient monitoring and control.

With its user-friendly interface and robust capabilities, Cove Data Protection is an ideal choice for businesses seeking reliable data protection.

N-able

Sample Customers

ITPS, North Hertfordshire Homes, SEMIKRON, Kajaani University of Applied Sciences, Test Valley Borough Council, EK Services

Computer Depot, Leading Edge Computers, IT Logic Australia

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP vs. N-able Cove Data Protection

July 2025

Free Report: Arcserve UDP vs. N-able Cove Data Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Arcserve UDP vs. N-able Cove Data Protection and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arcserve UDP vs. N-able Cove Data Protection report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.