No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Appian RPA vs FlowForma Digital Process Automation comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Appian RPA
Ranking in Process Automation
21st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (13th)
FlowForma Digital Process A...
Ranking in Process Automation
66th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Agentic Automation (38th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Appian RPA is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FlowForma Digital Process Automation is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Appian RPA0.8%
FlowForma Digital Process Automation0.3%
Other98.9%
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Kunal Sharda - PeerSpot reviewer
Director & Key Managerial Personnel at Newlight Technology Solutions Private Limited
Partnering with comprehensive automation for increased efficiency
The best feature of Appian RPA is that it is highly integrated into the Appian platform itself. It is very easy to configure that in the end-to-end Appian automation solution. The second notable feature is that Appian RPA gives you a lot of flexibility in terms of how you want to design the robotic tasks. It has a very detailed orchestration console which provides details about the entire runtime and the logs of Appian RPA where you can find in detail what the robot did on the virtual machine. Appian provides dashboards where users or admins can log in and see how the robots are performing various robotic tasks. It is very detailed and gives substantial insight into how Appian RPA is functioning or is operational. It also lets you drill down into specific details at each task level.
Use FlowForma Digital Process Automation?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Insurance Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Appian RPA?
I didn't handle payments or costs. We recommended infrastructure stacks to our clients, who implemented them, and we provided ongoing consulting services.
What needs improvement with Appian RPA?
In my opinion, Appian RPA can be improved. We are planning to conduct a proof of concept on volume because we are still not entirely certain about how well the record type feature performs on Appia...
What is your primary use case for Appian RPA?
We have been working with Appian RPA along with the entire workflow case management suite. Recently, Appian released their AI, which achieved general availability in August 2025. This is a document...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Jidoka RPA
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

empark, talan, liverpool, ayesa, aeromexico, teknei
1. Microsoft 2. Coca-Cola 3. Pfizer 4. Johnson & Johnson 5. IBM 6. General Electric 7. Procter & Gamble 8. Ford 9. Amazon 10. Google 11. Apple 12. Facebook 13. Netflix 14. Tesla 15. Uber 16. Airbnb 17. Adobe 18. Oracle 19. Cisco 20. Intel 21. HP 22. Dell 23. Samsung 24. Sony 25. Siemens 26. BMW 27. Volkswagen 28. Toyota 29. Honda 30. Airbus 31. Boeing 32. General Motors
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation. Updated: March 2026.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.