We performed a comparison between Appgate SDP and Guardicore Centra based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Morphisec and others in CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection Platforms)."It is pretty stable."
"The flexibility of the tool is valuable. It is very robust. It has a very robust configuration capability."
"The real bonus is the fact that we can secure applications, all the way down to the individual services, on each host. It's actually more granular security than we can get out of a traditional firewall."
"Guardicore Centra offers the best coverage specifically in backward compatibility with legacy operating systems."
"From day one, you get threat intelligence. It will immediately block active threats, which has been useful."
"I found the solution to be stable."
"The most valuable feature is the visibility of processes and connections."
"We like the centralized management of the firewalls. Until we installed Guardicore Centra, we managed all our firewalls individually, so making changes was complicated, difficult, and time-consuming."
"On the cloud, when you make some changes, it may be difficult."
"One thing that kind of sticks out to me is the ability to do a proper non-split tunnel. VPN tunnel-wise, it is not really a true unsplit tunnel, but I think that's just because of the way it's designed. A split VPN basically allows your system to talk to other systems without being forced down the tunnel. A VPN running in a non-split tunnel mode forces all the traffic down the tunnel to wherever you're VPNing to. It forces the traffic down so that the traffic is subject to the firewall and rules that you have in your corporate environment and such. It helps to prevent remote malicious folks that may be talking directly to that box from piggybacking into the corporate environment through it. They do it partially, but it would be nice to see more of an enterprise-level solution there."
"Supports become difficult when it's for a big organization. For a small organization, medium organization, it still makes sense, however, for a big organization, it makes life difficult."
"Sometimes, the speed needs improvement, especially when it comes to the generation of maps, where it can be a bit slow."
"Customers would want to see the cost improved."
"The long-term management of the security policies could be improved with some kind of automation platform, something like Chef or Puppet or Ansible, to help you manage the policies after day-one... to then manage the policies and changes to those policies, going forward, through some type of automation process is not turning out to be really easy."
"In our version, when using the terminal server, we cannot exclude user tasks for each session."
"The maps could go a bit faster. They are useful but slightly slow."
Appgate SDP is ranked 10th in CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection Platforms) with 2 reviews while Guardicore Centra is ranked 7th in CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection Platforms) with 7 reviews. Appgate SDP is rated 9.6, while Guardicore Centra is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Appgate SDP writes "Very capable, flexible, and robust". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Guardicore Centra writes "Allowed us to build out a data center topology without worrying about placement of physical or virtual firewalls that can create bottlenecks". Appgate SDP is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), whereas Guardicore Centra is most compared with Illumio Zero Trust Segmentation, Cisco Secure Workload, VMware NSX, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Check Point CloudGuard Network Security.
See our list of best CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection Platforms) vendors and best Microsegmentation Software vendors.
We monitor all CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection Platforms) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
