Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apica vs Mezmo comparison

Apica and Mezmo are both solutions in the Observability Pipeline Software category. Apica is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.7, while Mezmo is ranked #7. Apica holds a 2.9% mindshare in OPS, compared to Mezmo’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Mezmo users who would recommend it.
Apica
Read 11 Apica reviews
  • 70 Views
  • 34 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
Mezmo
Read 2 Mezmo reviews
  • 70 Views
  • 37 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024
```html

Apica and Mezmo are two prominent solutions in the monitoring and analytics field. Apica has the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and customer support, while Mezmo leads with its comprehensive features and advanced analytics capabilities.

Features: Apica provides robust monitoring, real-time alerts, and efficient support. Mezmo offers powerful data visualization, complex data stream handling, and extensive analytics integration.

Room for Improvement: Apica needs deeper analytics, more customization options, and enhanced user training materials. Mezmo could improve by reducing the learning curve, addressing performance slowdowns during large data processing, and refining user training materials.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apica is straightforward in deployment and offers responsive customer service. Mezmo takes more time to deploy due to its feature-rich nature and has mixed reviews on support effectiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Apica is noted for lower setup costs and satisfactory ROI in routine environments. Mezmo requires higher upfront costs but delivers significant ROI for complex data needs, making its pricing justified when its full feature set is utilized.

```
DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. Mezmo Report (Updated: May 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Apica vs. Mezmo
May 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apica
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
17th
Ranking in Log Management
17th
Ranking in Observability Pipeline Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
IT Operations Analytics (5th)
Mezmo
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
92nd
Ranking in Log Management
55th
Ranking in Observability Pipeline Software
7th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Observability Pipeline Software category, the mindshare of Apica is 2.9%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mezmo is 2.0%, down from 38.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Observability Pipeline Software
 

Featured Reviews

Punith H K - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features
It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.
Read full review
TO
It consolidates all logs into one place and provides required features and functionalities
Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to do RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"With the ZebraTester, the ability to have and store dynamic variables, when setting up the monitors, means you can extract that value and use it in a subsequent service call. This is something that has made our lives easier... This is one of the features that I like the most because it helps us in configuring these services, in a certain flow, without the need to re-record the whole thing."
"Apica allows me to record APIs easily and enhances scripts through options like auto-correlation, enabling me to access dynamic fields."
"We see the benefit almost every day. It allows us to be alerted whenever there is a store that is not responding properly around the world. We do have a network operation center (NOC) who receives these alerts, immediately checking if everything is okay."
"As always, within the IT industry, everybody's always looking to upgrade and update everything else like that. Apica has been one of those things but it's really hard to replace because it offers us the unique capability to see what the customer is seeing. A lot of other ones can do Selenium script and things like that, but there's a lot in Apica that we use right now. We utilize a lot of the scenario options in Apica right now, and there's a lot of other ones that do parts of it, but it doesn't do everything that Apica does."
"It is easy for beginners to learn and use Apica."
"It is easy to set up and configure."
"I like the transcript download feature. And with UI scripting, it's helpful that Apica handles a lot of the backend work automatically. I don't have to tag everything manually, though I can tag elements later if needed. It's really good at recording the steps."
"You can tell from the operational space of people who are using and consuming this data that they are more integrated. It is not dependent on one team anymore. It saves a lot of time by capturing and pinpointing the exact problem that is happening quickly. We have moved from getting escalations manually to getting escalations synthetically."
More Apica pros
"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."
"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."
 

Cons

"The tool does not provide automatic correlation features."
"I have noticed that the tool isn't widely recognized outside our organization. Also, there aren't any tutorials or dedicated resources for this tool, making it challenging for newcomers to learn. It would be beneficial if someone experienced with it could provide guidance."
"The initial screen on their dashboard could have a bit more data, but this is a small thing. It could have more data, so we do not need to drill down to a screen behind that initial information. I would like them to get a little better on the user interfaces that we need to go into."
"We could use more detailed information in the request and response sections."
"Apica is costly, and there's no way to test mobile applications through Apica."
"Apica should add more features and integrations with different tools and certain ticketing systems, like ServiceNow."
"The accuracy of alerts can be improved a little bit. Right now, it's pretty good in terms of alerting pretty quickly about failures or changes in response times. However, what we have seen happen is the number of alerts that we are getting is very frequent, and we would like to tone down the number of alerts. That's the only trouble we have. Apica could tone down those settings because there is no option for us to tone it down to a level that would reduce the alerts to a minimum. As a platform, it does send us good alerts, but it could be improved a bit."
"The having to install an application on your desktop to utilize something like ZebraTester is a little cumbersome. It would be nice to see that become a web-based application. Having the documentation a little more accessible, and easier to digest by people who are just learning how to use the framework, especially when it comes to more complex or more edge-based cases would be really helpful to have."
More Apica cons
"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."
"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"License management is another area that Apica could do better. We have already had these conversations with our account teams. This is something that they are looking at largely improving in upcoming releases. I believe that this is already on their roadmap."
"Apica is pretty cost-effective if you buy both solutions together: Synthetic and LoadTest. If you are going for one solution, the cost is on par with any tool in the market."
"The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap."
"Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."
"The product is less expensive compared to LoadRunner."
"The tool is completely free and open source. I've been using it for about two and a half years and installed it on both my personal and client machines without needing a license. All features are available for use without any hidden fees."
"I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides."
"The pricing is fair. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."
More Apica pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Observability Pipeline Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
31%
Computer Software Company
11%
Media Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?
The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?
I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?
Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica Logo
Dynatrace vs Apica
Compared 28% of the time
Cribl vs Apica Logo
Cribl vs Apica
Compared 20% of the time
Datadog vs Apica Logo
Datadog vs Apica
Compared 15% of the time
AlertSite vs Apica Logo
AlertSite vs Apica
Compared 13% of the time
Grafana vs Apica Logo
Grafana vs Apica
Compared 12% of the time
More Apica Competitors
Datadog vs Mezmo Logo
Datadog vs Mezmo
Compared 50% of the time
Cribl vs Mezmo Logo
Cribl vs Mezmo
Compared 27% of the time
Grafana Loki vs Mezmo Logo
Grafana Loki vs Mezmo
Compared 23% of the time
More Mezmo Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Apica
June 2025
Apica reportDownload Apica product report
Buyer's Guide
Apica vs. Mezmo
May 2025
Mezmo reportDownload Mezmo product report
 

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic
LogDNA
 

Overview

Apica offers a unified platform to remove complexity and cost associated with data management. You collect, control, store, and observe your data and can quickly identify and resolve performance issues before they impact the end-user. Apica Ascent swiftly analyzes telemetry data in real-time, enabling prompt issue resolution, while automated root cause analysis, powered by machine learning, streamlines troubleshooting in complex distributed systems. The platform simplifies data collection by automating and managing agents through the platform’s Fleet product. Its Flow product simplifies and optimizes pipeline control with AI and ML to help you easily understand complex workflows. Its Store component allows you to never run out of storage space while you index and store machine data centrally on one platform and reduce costs, and remediate faster. Observe offers modern observability data management, helping you with MELT data, effortless dashboarding, and seamless integration of synthetic and real data.

Experience the Apica Ascent Platform

Apica

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Mezmo
 

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo
Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce
Buyer's Guide
Apica vs. Mezmo
May 2025
Free Report: Apica vs. Mezmo
Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. Mezmo and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Apica vs. Mezmo report.

We monitor all Observability Pipeline Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.