We performed a comparison between Apache Web Server and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution offers good security."
"The most significant advantage is the ability to swiftly enable HTTPS services when my DNS is configured correctly."
"The solution's most valuable feature is reporting."
"It is more secure to use Apache and you will have fewer problems than other web services."
"The best thing about Apache is that it is open-source, so implementing my platform on-premises is less expansive than other solutions."
"Apache has proven to be incredibly reliable, and everything has operated smoothly without encountering any issues."
"Its community is its most valuable feature. Solving problems is easier on Apache because so many people know this product."
"It is scalable."
"It's convenient and barebone."
"Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."
"The solution is quite stable."
"The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance."
"Its technical support is excellent."
"By optimizing the infrastructure to allow the webserver to directly handle queries from memory—particularly by prioritizing the storage of queries in memory and processing them through the web server interface—I could potentially cut down the required instances from five hundred to two hundred."
"So far, for us, everything is okay."
"A monitoring interface would be great for this product. The monitoring dashboards for Apache's models are not included in the basic installation. You can install the basic monitoring model, then connect this model to another monitoring system."
"Its stability could be better."
"There is a security-related problem that depends on the web server's configuration."
"It would be great if technical support for Apache were available in Iran. It is a very important need."
"In future releases, I would like to see better server optimization."
"I want the user interface to be more user-friendly."
"A graphic user interface can be added."
"Its architecture needs improvement."
"It's hard to find out the root cause of errors."
"This solution needs better management UI."
"Lacks some functional requirements."
More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Apache Web Server is ranked 3rd in Application Infrastructure with 11 reviews while JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 9th in Application Infrastructure with 3 reviews. Apache Web Server is rated 8.6, while JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Apache Web Server writes "Useful in deploying servers to host websites with good modularity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "A stable and scalable solution that provides excellent technical support with a good response time". Apache Web Server is most compared with IIS, NGINX Plus, IBM WebSphere Application Server, Microsoft .NET Framework and Oracle SOA Suite, whereas JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with IBM WebSphere Application Server, Microsoft .NET Framework, IBM BPM and NGINX Plus. See our Apache Web Server vs. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.