Apache Web Server vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
3,673 views|3,087 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Red Hat Logo
2,907 views|2,515 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Web Server and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Apache Web Server vs. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Most of the features I liked were related to the performance during peak hours.""The most significant advantage is the ability to swiftly enable HTTPS services when my DNS is configured correctly.""Its community is its most valuable feature. Solving problems is easier on Apache because so many people know this product.""It is scalable.""The product is very cheap and stable.""The best thing about Apache is that it is open-source, so implementing my platform on-premises is less expansive than other solutions.""It is more secure to use Apache and you will have fewer problems than other web services.""It's very stable, and it hosts one of the biggest of many biggest web applications in the world."

More Apache Web Server Pros →

"The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance.""The solution is quite stable.""Its technical support is excellent.""It's convenient and barebone.""Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pros →

Cons
"By optimizing the infrastructure to allow the webserver to directly handle queries from memory—particularly by prioritizing the storage of queries in memory and processing them through the web server interface—I could potentially cut down the required instances from five hundred to two hundred.""So far, for us, everything is okay.""I want the user interface to be more user-friendly.""The GUI for the less experienced users needs some improvement. For some companies, it is hard to configure it if they have not had any experience.""A monitoring interface would be great for this product. The monitoring dashboards for Apache's models are not included in the basic installation. You can install the basic monitoring model, then connect this model to another monitoring system.""In future releases, I would like to see better server optimization.""Adding a reverse proxy to Apache Web Server would be a significant improvement.""It would be great if technical support for Apache were available in Iran. It is a very important need."

More Apache Web Server Cons →

"It's hard to find out the root cause of errors.""A graphic user interface can be added.""Its architecture needs improvement.""This solution needs better management UI.""Lacks some functional requirements."

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The apache software is free, open-source."
  • "It is a free-of-cost solution."
  • "There is no licensing cost for the product."
  • "It is an open-source solution."
  • More Apache Web Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "It is an open-source solution."
  • More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.
    Top Answer:The price of the product is an area handled by the procurement team in my company.
    Top Answer:When it comes to Apache Web Server, I don't have any suggestions for improvement because we use it in the UAT environment. For production, my company mainly uses NGINX. There is no direct package… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,673
    Comparisons
    3,087
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    417
    Rating
    8.7
    Views
    2,907
    Comparisons
    2,515
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    270
    Rating
    9.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Apache HTTP Server
    JBoss EAP, Red Hat EAP
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Apache HTTP Server Project was founded in 1995 by a group of webmasters, known as The Apache Group, with the aim of developing robust, richly-featured, freely-available and commercial-standard Web (HTTP) server source code. The result was Apache Web Server or Apache HTTP Server, which is an open-source public-domain web server.

    This collaborative project has been enhanced ever since with contributions from the core development team and other volunteers situated all over the globe. Also, hundreds of users of this open-source web server have contributed code, ideas, and documentation. The project falls under The Apache Software Foundation, which manages many open-source projects.

    Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is an open source platform for modern Java applications deployed in any environment. JBoss EAP’s architecture is modular, and cloud ready. The platform offers powerful management and automation for greater developer productivity. It is based on the open source Wildfly project (formerly known as JBoss Application Server).
    Sample Customers
    Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx
    APD, Banco Azteca, Roche, Tata Sky, Frost Bank
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Financial Services Firm21%
    University7%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government7%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apache Web Server vs. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Web Server vs. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Web Server is ranked 3rd in Application Infrastructure with 21 reviews while JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 9th in Application Infrastructure with 5 reviews. Apache Web Server is rated 8.6, while JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Apache Web Server writes "Has good security, speed and traffic handling features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "A stable and scalable solution that provides excellent technical support with a good response time". Apache Web Server is most compared with IIS, NGINX Plus, IBM WebSphere Application Server, Microsoft .NET Framework and WebLogic Suite, whereas JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with IBM WebSphere Application Server, Microsoft .NET Framework, IBM BPM and NGINX Plus. See our Apache Web Server vs. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform report.

    See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

    We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.