Amazon SageMaker vs SAS Enterprise Miner comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and SAS are both solutions in the Data Science Platforms category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAS is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 6.9% mindshare in Data Science Platforms, compared to SAS’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of SAS users who would recommend it.

Amazon SageMaker

Read 37 Amazon SageMaker reviews

6,112 Views
4,892 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

SAS Enterprise Miner

Read 13 SAS Enterprise Miner reviews

616 Views
474 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Amazon SageMaker

SAS Enterprise Miner

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

SAS Enterprise Miner and Amazon SageMaker compete in the analytical and predictive modeling market. Amazon SageMaker has the upper hand due to its comprehensive integration capabilities and scalability.

Features: SAS Enterprise Miner provides robust data manipulation, in-depth statistical analysis, and decision tree creation. It supports rich model diagnostics, visual data exploration, and seamless data processing. Amazon SageMaker offers seamless AWS integration, model deployment services, and automated hyperparameter tuning. It supports built-in algorithms, Jupyter Notebooks, and advanced model monitoring.

Room for Improvement: SAS Enterprise Miner can enhance its scalability and integration capabilities, improve cloud integration, and offer more diverse language support. Amazon SageMaker could improve user-friendliness for non-experts, reduce dependency on AWS infrastructure, and expand initial training resources for beginners.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon SageMaker leverages AWS's cloud infrastructure for rapid deployment and efficiency, benefiting from AWS's extensive support. SAS Enterprise Miner requires traditional installations but offers dedicated customer support for its users.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Enterprise Miner typically involves higher upfront costs but provides substantial long-term ROI. Amazon SageMaker, with its pay-as-you-go pricing, allows cost-effective scaling and faster ROI realization. Its flexible pricing model supports rapid implementation and alignment with business needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon SageMaker vs. SAS Enterprise Miner Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon SageMaker vs. SAS Enterprise Miner

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon SageMaker

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Development Platforms (5th)

SAS Enterprise Miner

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

18th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Mining (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Data Science Platforms category, the mindshare of Amazon SageMaker is 6.9%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Enterprise Miner is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Science Platforms

Featured Reviews

Hemant Paralkar

Lead Consultant at Saama

Improves team collaboration with advanced feature sharing but needs a better user experience

Improvement is needed in the no-code and low-code capabilities of Amazon SageMaker. This would empower citizen data scientists to utilize the tool more effectively since many data scientists do not have a core development background. Additionally, dealing with frequent UI updates can be challenging, especially for infrastructure architects like myself. It involves effort to migrate to new UIs, making the updates not seamless. User auditing requires enhancements as tracking operations performed by users can be difficult due to dynamic IP validation and role propagation.

Read full review

reviewer1352853

Executive Head of analytics at a retailer with 5,001-10,000 employees

A stable product that is easy to deploy and can be used for structured and unstructured data mining

We use the solution for predictive analytics to do structured and unstructured data mining I like the way the product visually shows the data pipeline. The product must provide better integration with cloud-native technologies. I have been using the solution for 20 years. The product is very…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The superb thing that SageMaker brings is that it wraps everything well. It's got the deployment, the whole framework."

"They are doing a good job of evolving."

"We were able to use the product to automate processes."

"SageMaker offers functionalities like Jupyter Notebooks for development, built-in algorithms, model tuning, and options to deploy models on managed infrastructure."

"Feature Store, CodeCommit, versioning, model control, and CI/CD pipelines are the most valuable features in Amazon SageMaker."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon SageMaker for me is the model deployment service."

"The tool has made client management easier where patients need to upload their health records and we can use the tool to understand details on treatment date, amount, etc."

"The few projects we have done have been promising."

More Amazon SageMaker pros

"The solution is very good for data mining or any mining issues."

"he solution is scalable."

"Most of the features, especially on the data analysis tool pack, are really good. The way they do clustering and output is great. You can do fairly elaborate outputs. The results, the ensembles, all of these, are fantastic."

"I like the way the product visually shows the data pipeline."

"Good data management and analytics."

"The setup is straightforward. Deployment doesn't take more than 30 minutes."

"The most valuable feature is that you can use multiple algorithms for creating models and then you can compare the results between them."

"The most valuable feature is the decision tree creation."

More SAS Enterprise Miner pros

Cons

"The main challenge with Amazon SageMaker is the integrations."

"The solution needs to be cheaper since it now charges per document for extraction."

"One area for improvement is the pricing, which can be quite high."

"For any cloud provider, the cost has to be substantially reduced, especially in the case of Amazon SageMaker, which is extremely expensive for huge workloads."

"Amazon SageMaker can make it simpler to manage the data flow from start to finish, such as by integrating data, usingthe machine, and deploying models. This process could be more user-friendly compared to other tools. I would also like to improve integration with Bedrock and the LLM connection for AWS."

"In my opinion, one improvement for Amazon SageMaker would be to offer serverless GPUs. Currently, we incur costs on an hourly basis. It would be beneficial if the tool could provide pay-as-you-go pricing based on endpoints."

"The main challenge with Amazon SageMaker is the integrations."

More Amazon SageMaker cons

"The visualization of the models is not very attractive, so the graphics should be improved."

"The user interface of the solution needs improvement. It needs to be more visual."

"Technical support could be improved."

"The initial setup is challenging if doing it for the first time."

"The solution is much more complex than other options."

"The solution is very stable, but we do have some problems with discrepancies involving SAS not matching with the latest Java versions. It's not stable in cases where SAS tries to run on a different version because SAS doesn't connect with the latest Java update. Once a month we need to restart systems from scratch."

"The product must provide better integration with cloud-native technologies."

"While I don't personally need tutorials, I can't say that it wouldn't be helpful for others to have some to help them navigate and operate the system."

More SAS Enterprise Miner cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is complicated as it is based on what kind of machines you are using, the type of storage, and the kind of computation."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"Amazon SageMaker is a very expensive product."

"I rate the pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest price, and ten is the highest price. The solution is priced reasonably. There is no additional cost to be paid in excess of the standard licensing fees."

"There is no license required for the solution since you can use it on demand."

"On average, customers pay about $300,000 USD per month."

"In terms of pricing, I'd also rate it ten out of ten because it's been beneficial compared to other solutions."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable."

More Amazon SageMaker pricing and cost advice

"This solution is for large corporations because not everybody can afford it."

"The solution is expensive for an individual, but for an enterprise/institution (purchasing bulk licenses), it is not a high price for the use that will come from it."

"The solution must improve its licensing models."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Educational Organization

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

University

12%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How would you compare Databricks vs Amazon SageMaker?

We researched AWS SageMaker, but in the end, we chose Databricks. Databricks is a Unified Analytics Platform designed to accelerate innovation projects. It is based on Spark so it is very fast. It...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon SageMaker?

We've had experience with unique ML projects using SageMaker. For example, we're developing a platform similar to ChatGPT that requires models. We utilize Amazon SageMaker to create endpoints for t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon SageMaker?

Before deploying SageMaker, I reviewed the pricing, especially for notebook instances. The cost for small to medium instances is not very high.

See all answers

What do you like most about SAS Enterprise Miner?

I like the way the product visually shows the data pipeline.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAS Enterprise Miner?

The solution must improve its licensing models. It bundles all the products into smaller products. We can only have a subset of the functionality available according to our license. I rate the pric...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAS Enterprise Miner?

The product must provide better integration with cloud-native technologies.

See all answers

Comparisons

Databricks vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 15% of the time

Azure OpenAI vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 12% of the time

Dataiku vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 11% of the time

Google Vertex AI vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 9% of the time

Domino Data Science Platform vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 7% of the time

More Amazon SageMaker Competitors

SAS Visual Analytics vs SAS Enterprise Miner

Compared 29% of the time

IBM SPSS Modeler vs SAS Enterprise Miner

Compared 23% of the time

KNIME vs SAS Enterprise Miner

Compared 21% of the time

Altair RapidMiner vs SAS Enterprise Miner

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio vs SAS Enterprise Miner

Compared 9% of the time

More SAS Enterprise Miner Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon SageMaker

April 2025

Download Amazon SageMaker product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Mining

April 2025

Download SAS Enterprise Miner product report

Also Known As

AWS SageMaker, SageMaker

Enterprise Miner

Overview

Amazon SageMaker is a fully-managed platform that enables developers and data scientists to quickly and easily build, train, and deploy machine learning models at any scale. Amazon SageMaker removes all the barriers that typically slow down developers who want to use machine learning.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

SAS Enterprise Miner is a solution to create accurate predictive and descriptive models on large volumes of data across different sources in the organization. SAS Enterprise Miner offers many features and functionalities for the business analysts to model their data. Some of the business applications are for detecting fraud, minimizing risk, resource demands, reducing asset downtime, campaigns and reduce customer attrition.

SAS

Sample Customers

DigitalGlobe, Thomson Reuters Center for AI and Cognitive Computing, Hotels.com, GE Healthcare, Tinder, Intuit

Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Gloucestershire Constabulary, GS Home Shopping, HealthPartners, IAG New Zealand, iJET, Invacare

Buyer's Guide

Amazon SageMaker vs. SAS Enterprise Miner

April 2025

Free Report: Amazon SageMaker vs. SAS Enterprise Miner

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon SageMaker vs. SAS Enterprise Miner and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon SageMaker vs. SAS Enterprise Miner report.

See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.