Amazon SageMaker vs SAS Enterprise Miner comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and SAS are both solutions in the Data Science Platforms category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3, while SAS is ranked #23. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.6% mindshare in Data Science Platforms, compared to SAS’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of SAS users who would recommend it.

Amazon SageMaker

Read 39 Amazon SageMaker reviews

6,333 Views
3,673 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SAS Enterprise Miner

Read 13 SAS Enterprise Miner reviews

1,532 Views
1,195 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Amazon SageMaker

SAS Enterprise Miner

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

SAS Enterprise Miner and Amazon SageMaker compete in the analytical and predictive modeling market. Amazon SageMaker has the upper hand due to its comprehensive integration capabilities and scalability.

Features: SAS Enterprise Miner provides robust data manipulation, in-depth statistical analysis, and decision tree creation. It supports rich model diagnostics, visual data exploration, and seamless data processing. Amazon SageMaker offers seamless AWS integration, model deployment services, and automated hyperparameter tuning. It supports built-in algorithms, Jupyter Notebooks, and advanced model monitoring.

Room for Improvement: SAS Enterprise Miner can enhance its scalability and integration capabilities, improve cloud integration, and offer more diverse language support. Amazon SageMaker could improve user-friendliness for non-experts, reduce dependency on AWS infrastructure, and expand initial training resources for beginners.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon SageMaker leverages AWS's cloud infrastructure for rapid deployment and efficiency, benefiting from AWS's extensive support. SAS Enterprise Miner requires traditional installations but offers dedicated customer support for its users.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Enterprise Miner typically involves higher upfront costs but provides substantial long-term ROI. Amazon SageMaker, with its pay-as-you-go pricing, allows cost-effective scaling and faster ROI realization. Its flexible pricing model supports rapid implementation and alignment with business needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon SageMaker vs. SAS Enterprise Miner Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon SageMaker vs. SAS Enterprise Miner

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 889,955 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon SageMaker

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Development Platforms (4th)

SAS Enterprise Miner

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Mining (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Data Science Platforms category, the mindshare of Amazon SageMaker is 3.6%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Enterprise Miner is 1.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Science Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon SageMaker	3.6%
SAS Enterprise Miner	1.8%
Other	94.6%

Data Science Platforms

Featured Reviews

Saurabh Jaiswal

Python AWS & AI Expert at a tech consulting company

Create innovative assistants with seamless data integration for large-scale projects

The various integration options available in Amazon SageMaker, such as Firehose for connecting to data pipelines, are simple to use. Tools like AWS Glue integrate well for data transformations. The Databricks integration aids data scientists and engineers. SageMaker is fully managed, offers high availability, flexibility with TensorFlow, PyTorch, and MXNet, and comes with pre-trained algorithms for forecasting, anomaly detection, and more.

Read full review

reviewer1352853

Executive Head of analytics at a retailer with 5,001-10,000 employees

A stable product that is easy to deploy and can be used for structured and unstructured data mining

We use the solution for predictive analytics to do structured and unstructured data mining I like the way the product visually shows the data pipeline. The product must provide better integration with cloud-native technologies. I have been using the solution for 20 years. The product is very…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most valuable features of Amazon SageMaker for me is the one-touch deployment, which simplifies the process greatly."

"The most valuable features in Amazon SageMaker are its AutoML, feature store, and automated hyperparameter tuning capabilities."

"The Autopilot feature is really good because it's helpful for people who don't have much experience with coding or data pipelines. When we suggest SageMaker to clients, they don't have to go through all the steps manually. They can leverage Autopilot to choose variables, run experiments, and monitor costs. The results are also pretty accurate."

"SageMaker offers functionalities like Jupyter Notebooks for development, built-in algorithms, model tuning, and options to deploy models on managed infrastructure."

"There is no cessation from what I can see; whatever they have in the industry, they can solve 98% of the use cases."

"Allows you to create API endpoints."

"I appreciate the ease of use in Amazon SageMaker."

"They are doing a good job of evolving."

More Amazon SageMaker pros

"It enables statistical modeling of data using Base SAS (another product from the same vendor) as the backbone."

"The most valuable feature is that you can use multiple algorithms for creating models and then you can compare the results between them."

"The solution is very good for data mining or any mining issues."

"Most of the features, especially on the data analysis tool pack, are really good. The way they do clustering and output is great. You can do fairly elaborate outputs. The results, the ensembles, all of these, are fantastic."

"The solution is able to handle quite large amounts of data beautifully."

"I like the way the product visually shows the data pipeline."

"The data processing of the solution is very good, easy to use, both for enterprise and personal use."

"The most valuable feature is the decision tree creation."

More SAS Enterprise Miner pros

Cons

"The payment and monitoring metrics are a bit confusing not only for Amazon SageMaker but also for the range of other products that fall under AWS, especially for a new user of the product."

"Improvement is needed in the no-code and low-code capabilities of Amazon SageMaker. This would empower citizen data scientists to utilize the tool more effectively since many data scientists do not have a core development background."

"There are other better solutions for large data, such as Databricks."

"One area where Amazon SageMaker could improve is its pricing. The high costs can drive companies to explore other cloud options. Additionally, while generally good, the updates sometimes come with bugs, and the documentation could be much better. More examples and clearer guidance would be helpful."

"The dashboard could be improved by including more features and providing more information about deployed models, their drift, performance, scaling, and customization options."

"The training modules could be enhanced. We had to take in-person training to fully understand SageMaker, and while the trainers were great, I think more comprehensive online modules would be helpful."

"The documentation must be made clearer and more user-friendly."

"In my opinion, one improvement for Amazon SageMaker would be to offer serverless GPUs. Currently, we incur costs on an hourly basis. It would be beneficial if the tool could provide pay-as-you-go pricing based on endpoints."

More Amazon SageMaker cons

"Plus it is prohibitively expensive and is not available with perpetual licensing."

"Virtualization could be much better."

"We really don't like the protocols the solution offers. The solution is much more complex than other options."

"While I don't personally need tutorials, I can't say that it wouldn't be helpful for others to have some to help them navigate and operate the system."

"The user interface of the solution needs improvement. It needs to be more visual."

"The stability isn't perfect. We have issues with accuracy in some AI forecasting areas, and the accuracy is not as good as the clients need it to be."

"The ease of use can be improved. When you are new it seems a bit complex."

"The visualization of the models is not very attractive, so the graphics should be improved."

More SAS Enterprise Miner cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The support costs are 10% of the Amazon fees and it comes by default."

"The solution is relatively cheaper."

"The pricing is comparable."

"The pricing could be better, especially for querying. The per-query model feels expensive."

"On average, customers pay about $300,000 USD per month."

"The cost offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model. It depends on the instance that you do."

"SageMaker is worth the money for our use case."

"I would rate the solution's price a ten out of ten since it is very high."

More Amazon SageMaker pricing and cost advice

"The solution is expensive for an individual, but for an enterprise/institution (purchasing bulk licenses), it is not a high price for the use that will come from it."

"This solution is for large corporations because not everybody can afford it."

"The solution must improve its licensing models."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

889,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

University

Financial Services Firm

19%

Construction Company

12%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

How would you compare Databricks vs Amazon SageMaker?

We researched AWS SageMaker, but in the end, we chose Databricks. Databricks is a Unified Analytics Platform designed to accelerate innovation projects. It is based on Spark so it is very fast. It...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon SageMaker?

We've had experience with unique ML projects using SageMaker. For example, we're developing a platform similar to ChatGPT that requires models. We utilize Amazon SageMaker to create endpoints for t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon SageMaker?

If you manage it effectively, their pricing is reasonable. It's similar to anything in the cloud; if you don't manage it properly, it can be expensive, but if you do, it's fine.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Databricks vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 9% of the time

Google Vertex AI vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 7% of the time

Stack AI vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 6% of the time

Dataiku vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 5% of the time

DataRobot vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 5% of the time

More Amazon SageMaker Competitors

KNIME Business Hub vs SAS Enterprise Miner

Compared 13% of the time

Azure Data Lake Analytics vs SAS Enterprise Miner

Compared 7% of the time

IBM SPSS Modeler vs SAS Enterprise Miner

Compared 7% of the time

IBM SPSS Statistics vs SAS Enterprise Miner

Compared 5% of the time

SAS Analytics vs SAS Enterprise Miner

Compared 5% of the time

More SAS Enterprise Miner Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon SageMaker

April 2026

Download Amazon SageMaker product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Mining

March 2026

Download SAS Enterprise Miner product report

Also Known As

AWS SageMaker, SageMaker

Enterprise Miner

Overview

Amazon SageMaker is a fully-managed platform that enables developers and data scientists to quickly and easily build, train, and deploy machine learning models at any scale. Amazon SageMaker removes all the barriers that typically slow down developers who want to use machine learning.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

SAS Enterprise Miner is a solution to create accurate predictive and descriptive models on large volumes of data across different sources in the organization. SAS Enterprise Miner offers many features and functionalities for the business analysts to model their data. Some of the business applications are for detecting fraud, minimizing risk, resource demands, reducing asset downtime, campaigns and reduce customer attrition.

SAS

Sample Customers

DigitalGlobe, Thomson Reuters Center for AI and Cognitive Computing, Hotels.com, GE Healthcare, Tinder, Intuit

Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Gloucestershire Constabulary, GS Home Shopping, HealthPartners, IAG New Zealand, iJET, Invacare

Buyer's Guide

Amazon SageMaker vs. SAS Enterprise Miner

April 2026

Free Report: Amazon SageMaker vs. SAS Enterprise Miner

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon SageMaker vs. SAS Enterprise Miner and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

889,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon SageMaker vs. SAS Enterprise Miner report.

See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.