Amazon MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Broadcom are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5, while Broadcom is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 4.4% mindshare in MQ, compared to Broadcom’s 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Amazon MQ

Read 8 Amazon MQ reviews

732 Views
637 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 84 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

4,408 Views
1,366 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Amazon MQ

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and Amazon MQ compete in the cloud-based data and messaging solutions category. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is noted for stronger support and pricing satisfaction, while Amazon MQ stands out for its feature richness, often making it a worthwhile investment based on user needs.

Features: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions provides advanced data management capabilities, integration with Kubernetes, and comprehensive analytics. Amazon MQ offers native support for diverse messaging protocols, reliable service management, and ease of use for diverse applications.

Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions could improve by enhancing its message brokering capabilities, providing more flexible deployment across multiple cloud environments, and reducing complexity in configuration. Amazon MQ might focus on expanding integration options outside AWS, improving support for on-premises deployment, and enhancing the scalability for larger enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions provides robust support and flexible deployment options that increase user confidence, making it adaptable across diverse environments. Amazon MQ offers easy integration with AWS services and stable performance but is less flexible outside its ecosystem, with adequate customer support.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions typically involves a higher initial setup cost but offers a strong ROI through comprehensive features and excellent support. Amazon MQ presents manageable setup costs and a satisfactory ROI through its efficient message brokering, particularly beneficial for organizations utilizing AWS infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,813 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (6th), Relational Databases Tools (13th), Data Warehouse (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Amazon MQ is 4.4%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 7.0%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions	7.0%
Amazon MQ	4.4%
Other	88.6%

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

RamilCerrada

Solution architect at SM Supermalls

Has provided consistent functionality across on-premise and cloud while simplifying cloud integration

I have experience with on-premise setups using ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ, but with regards to AWS, I use it via cloud only. There's a free tier with Amazon MQ based on their website, which is a six-month free trial of a single instance, allowing per month usage of either ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ, five gig of Amazon EFS storage, and for ActiveMQ, it's 20 gig of Amazon EBS storage for RabbitMQ. I did not purchase Amazon MQ through AWS Marketplace. Amazon MQ has published information about having 650 hours of free trial usage. This can be found via the AWS website by searching for AWS MQ. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Amazon MQ an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Moisés Guillén

Has improved server deployment speed and simplified Kubernetes cluster administration

My main use case for VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is Tanzu Basic TKB version 2.4 I focus on the creation of Kubernetes clusters with VMware Tanzu Data Solutions. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions has positively impacted my organization because it is efficient, easy, fast, and aids in the creation and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon MQ is important for being collaborative, allowing for centralized information."

"Amazon MQ is a secure solution."

"Amazon MQ is managed by AWS and is easy to use."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."

"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."

"Since we utilize AWS, it's easy to integrate Amazon MQ and work with other third-party software, as they have standard communications via API or native language."

"We have found Amazon MQ to provide scalability, robustness, and security."

"Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."

"The solution is stable."

"The stability of this solution was very good."

"RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the provided SDKs."

"The solution improved our site reliability."

"The solution's best feature is its exceptional speed, delivering efficient utilization of resources."

"The product is not complex; I do not have to create stored procedures, functions, or views."

"We chose Greenplum because of the architecture in terms of clustering databases and being able to have, or at least utilize the resources that are sitting on a database."

"Helps us to achieve large-scale analytics."

Cons

"Monitoring capabilities are not yet fully developed, since it's a message broker service, so it focuses more on the health of Apache."

"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."

"The solution needs improvement in the back end and security."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"In community support, especially with distributed systems and integration, there is a need for better system organization."

"If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great."

"Amazon MQ isn't a cheap tool."

"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."

"The product has to improve the crisis management, especially in memory issues."

"We would like to see Greenplum maintain a closer relationship with and parity to features implemented in PostgreSQL."

"they need to interact more with customers. They need to explain the features, especially when there are new releases of Greenplum. I know just from information I've found that it has other features, it can be used to for analytics, for integration with Big Data, Hadoop. They need to focus on this part with the customer."

"The initial deployment was a little difficult."

"VMware RabbitMQ's configuration process could be easier to understand."

"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."

"Some integration with other platforms like design tools, and ETL development tools, that will enable some advanced functionality, like fully down processing, etc."

"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"As a client or as an end user, I would say that Google Cloud Storage or Google Cloud are cheaper than Amazon MQ."

"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."

"This is an open source solution."

"The product is available for free use since it is an open-source technology."

"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."

"Since the tool is an open-source product, there is no need to pay anything."

"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."

"The pricing is okay."

"Tanzu Greenplum's pricing is really competitive and gives excellent value for money."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,813 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon MQ?

The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon MQ?

Amazon MQ needs to have data collected on performance to analyze trends for improvement. Additionally, some tools can suggest how to improve performance in terms of speed, time, and processing, whi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon MQ?

I have some experience working with Amazon MQ.

See all answers

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware RabbitMQ?

RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the pro...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware RabbitMQ?

The product is free of cost.

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon SQS vs Amazon MQ

Compared 25% of the time

IBM MQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 18% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Amazon MQ

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service vs Amazon MQ

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 12% of the time

More Amazon MQ Competitors

Nutanix Database Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 6% of the time

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 6% of the time

Snowflake vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

February 2026

Download Amazon MQ product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

January 2026

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

No data available

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

February 2026

Free Report: Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,813 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.