Amazon MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Broadcom are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while Broadcom is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.8% mindshare in MQ, compared to Broadcom’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Amazon MQ

Read 8 Amazon MQ reviews

781 Views
664 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 84 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

3,487 Views
1,465 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Amazon MQ

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and Amazon MQ compete in the cloud-based data and messaging solutions category. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is noted for stronger support and pricing satisfaction, while Amazon MQ stands out for its feature richness, often making it a worthwhile investment based on user needs.

Features: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions provides advanced data management capabilities, integration with Kubernetes, and comprehensive analytics. Amazon MQ offers native support for diverse messaging protocols, reliable service management, and ease of use for diverse applications.

Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions could improve by enhancing its message brokering capabilities, providing more flexible deployment across multiple cloud environments, and reducing complexity in configuration. Amazon MQ might focus on expanding integration options outside AWS, improving support for on-premises deployment, and enhancing the scalability for larger enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions provides robust support and flexible deployment options that increase user confidence, making it adaptable across diverse environments. Amazon MQ offers easy integration with AWS services and stable performance but is less flexible outside its ecosystem, with adequate customer support.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions typically involves a higher initial setup cost but offers a strong ROI through comprehensive features and excellent support. Amazon MQ presents manageable setup costs and a satisfactory ROI through its efficient message brokering, particularly beneficial for organizations utilizing AWS infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (7th), Relational Databases Tools (15th), Data Warehouse (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Amazon MQ is 3.8%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 6.0%, down from 9.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions	6.0%
Amazon MQ	3.8%
Other	90.2%

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

AdnanKhan

Senior System Administrator at Ovrlod

Offers good web hosting capacity and security features, but price needs to be reduced

In terms of Amazon MQ's scalability and throughput capabilities, the tool is mostly accessible, stable, and competent with similar platforms. The tool's web hosting capacity and security features are good. The impact of the solution on process efficiencies depends on the clients. If the traffic is too high for a client, I suggest they go with Azure as it is more scalable and stable, while the support is good. I recommend Azure over Amazon MQ. Starting with Amazon MQ can be a bit tricky, but I know that the product is mature and the support is very good. The integration capabilities of Amazon MQ are flexible. I am not using AI with the tool. I would not recommend Amazon MQ to others. As a service provider, my company usually recommends cheaply priced and reliable solutions to our customers. Azure is one most reliable tool that comes at a good price point. Even Google Cloud is a super solution but for launching Google Cloud, support is not available, so one needs to do it with tutorials which are not completely available in YouTube. I rate the tool a seven and a half out of ten.

Read full review

Sushma Polavarapu

Sr Data Analytics Consultant at Capgemini

Create essential reporting scripts with simplicity but has some operational challenges

We mainly create functions and scripts required for reporting The product is not complex; I do not have to create stored procedures, functions, or views. It's just simple to use. There is general room for improvement. I have been using it for five years. I have faced stability issues, mainly…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."

"Amazon MQ is important for being collaborative, allowing for centralized information."

"Since we utilize AWS, it's easy to integrate Amazon MQ and work with other third-party software, as they have standard communications via API or native language."

"Amazon MQ is managed by AWS and is easy to use."

"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."

"We have found Amazon MQ to provide scalability, robustness, and security."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."

"Amazon MQ is a secure solution."

"The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure."

"The solution can scale."

"It can be configured to be a very fast message broker. I like the stability, the built-in admin tools and plugin architecture."

"The product is not complex; I do not have to create stored procedures, functions, or views."

"It's one of the fastest databases in the market. It's easy to use. From a maintenance perspective it's a good product. The segmentation, or architecture of the product is different than other databases such as Oracle. So even in 10 years, the data distribution for such segments will not affect other segments. The query performance of the product, for complex queries, is very good. It has good integration with Hadoop."

"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."

"Helps us to achieve large-scale analytics."

"Scalability is simple because it's an MPP database. If you need more processing power or you need more storage, you just add a few more nodes in the cluster. It works on common commodity hardware. You can use any type of server. You don't need to have proprietary hardware. It's fairly flexible."

Cons

"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."

"Amazon MQ isn't a cheap tool."

"In community support, especially with distributed systems and integration, there is a need for better system organization."

"If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great."

"Monitoring capabilities are not yet fully developed, since it's a message broker service, so it focuses more on the health of Apache."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."

"The solution needs improvement in the back end and security."

"Their implementation is quite tricky. It's not that easy to implement RabbitMQ as a cluster."

"If you have a user consuming a huge load of resources, it takes down the entire system."

"The installation is difficult and should be made easier."

"We needed to configure additional plugins. While it was relatively easy to do this on-premises, it became more challenging in the cloud."

"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."

"They need to enhance integration with other Big Data products... to integrate with Big Data platforms, and to open a bi-directional connection between Greenplum and Big Data."

"It will be very useful if we could communicate with other database types from Greenplum (using a database link)."

"The product has to improve the crisis management, especially in memory issues."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"As a client or as an end user, I would say that Google Cloud Storage or Google Cloud are cheaper than Amazon MQ."

"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."

"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."

"The pricing is okay."

"This is an open source solution."

"It is an open-source product."

"The product is available for free use since it is an open-source technology."

"It is an open-source platform. Although, we have to pay for additional features."

"It’s an open-source solution."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon MQ?

The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon MQ?

Amazon MQ needs to have data collected on performance to analyze trends for improvement. Additionally, some tools can suggest how to improve performance in terms of speed, time, and processing, whi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon MQ?

I have some experience working with Amazon MQ.

See all answers

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware RabbitMQ?

RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the pro...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware RabbitMQ?

The product is free of cost.

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon SQS vs Amazon MQ

Compared 34% of the time

IBM MQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 21% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Amazon MQ

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service vs Amazon MQ

Compared 9% of the time

More Amazon MQ Competitors

Oracle Exadata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 12% of the time

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Essbase Cloud Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 3% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

October 2025

Download Amazon MQ product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

October 2025

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

No data available

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

September 2025

Free Report: Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.