Amazon MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Broadcom are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.6, while Broadcom is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.8% mindshare in MQ, compared to Broadcom’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Amazon MQ

Read 7 Amazon MQ reviews

845 Views
710 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 83 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

3,677 Views
1,618 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Amazon MQ

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and Amazon MQ compete in the cloud-based data and messaging solutions category. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is noted for stronger support and pricing satisfaction, while Amazon MQ stands out for its feature richness, often making it a worthwhile investment based on user needs.

Features: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions provides advanced data management capabilities, integration with Kubernetes, and comprehensive analytics. Amazon MQ offers native support for diverse messaging protocols, reliable service management, and ease of use for diverse applications.

Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions could improve by enhancing its message brokering capabilities, providing more flexible deployment across multiple cloud environments, and reducing complexity in configuration. Amazon MQ might focus on expanding integration options outside AWS, improving support for on-premises deployment, and enhancing the scalability for larger enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions provides robust support and flexible deployment options that increase user confidence, making it adaptable across diverse environments. Amazon MQ offers easy integration with AWS services and stable performance but is less flexible outside its ecosystem, with adequate customer support.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions typically involves a higher initial setup cost but offers a strong ROI through comprehensive features and excellent support. Amazon MQ presents manageable setup costs and a satisfactory ROI through its efficient message brokering, particularly beneficial for organizations utilizing AWS infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (5th), Relational Databases Tools (12th), Data Warehouse (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Amazon MQ is 3.8%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 5.7%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions	5.7%
Amazon MQ	3.8%
Other	90.5%

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

AdnanKhan

Senior System Administrator at Ovrlod

Offers good web hosting capacity and security features, but price needs to be reduced

In terms of Amazon MQ's scalability and throughput capabilities, the tool is mostly accessible, stable, and competent with similar platforms. The tool's web hosting capacity and security features are good. The impact of the solution on process efficiencies depends on the clients. If the traffic is too high for a client, I suggest they go with Azure as it is more scalable and stable, while the support is good. I recommend Azure over Amazon MQ. Starting with Amazon MQ can be a bit tricky, but I know that the product is mature and the support is very good. The integration capabilities of Amazon MQ are flexible. I am not using AI with the tool. I would not recommend Amazon MQ to others. As a service provider, my company usually recommends cheaply priced and reliable solutions to our customers. Azure is one most reliable tool that comes at a good price point. Even Google Cloud is a super solution but for launching Google Cloud, support is not available, so one needs to do it with tutorials which are not completely available in YouTube. I rate the tool a seven and a half out of ten.

Read full review

Sushma Polavarapu

Sr Data Analytics Consultant at Capgemini

Create essential reporting scripts with simplicity but has some operational challenges

We mainly create functions and scripts required for reporting The product is not complex; I do not have to create stored procedures, functions, or views. It's just simple to use. There is general room for improvement. I have been using it for five years. I have faced stability issues, mainly…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."

"Amazon MQ is important for being collaborative, allowing for centralized information."

"We have found Amazon MQ to provide scalability, robustness, and security."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."

"Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."

"Amazon MQ is a secure solution."

"Amazon MQ is managed by AWS and is easy to use."

"We chose Greenplum because of the architecture in terms of clustering databases and being able to have, or at least utilize the resources that are sitting on a database."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."

"The product is not complex."

"Pivotal Greenplum's shared-nothing architecture."

"It's super easy to deploy and it also supports different languages and analytics."

"It can be configured to be a very fast message broker. I like the stability, the built-in admin tools and plugin architecture."

"Tanzu Greenplum's most valuable features include the integration of modern data science approaches across an MPP platform."

Cons

"Amazon MQ isn't a cheap tool."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."

"The solution needs improvement in the back end and security."

"In community support, especially with distributed systems and integration, there is a need for better system organization."

"If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great."

"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."

"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."

"Tanzu Greenplum's compression for GPText could be made more efficient."

"We would like to see Greenplum maintain a closer relationship with and parity to features implemented in PostgreSQL."

"Scalability issues are present."

"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."

"If you have a user consuming a huge load of resources, it takes down the entire system."

"Implementation takes a long time."

"The user interface could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As a client or as an end user, I would say that Google Cloud Storage or Google Cloud are cheaper than Amazon MQ."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."

"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."

"Tanzu Greenplum's pricing is really competitive and gives excellent value for money."

"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."

"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."

"Since the tool is an open-source product, there is no need to pay anything."

"are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."

"The price is pretty good."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	48

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon MQ?

The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon MQ?

The message queue requires an improvement in the message template MQ link. If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon MQ?

We are using Amazon MQ for our AI model. It's used for notifications and other services. We have an application for which Amazon MQ acts as a broker.

See all answers

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware RabbitMQ?

RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the pro...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware RabbitMQ?

The product is free of cost.

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon SQS vs Amazon MQ

Compared 37% of the time

IBM MQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 23% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 14% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Amazon MQ

Compared 11% of the time

More Amazon MQ Competitors

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 14% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Essbase Cloud Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Database Appliance vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 7% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

August 2025

Download Amazon MQ product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

August 2025

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

No data available

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

September 2025

Free Report: Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.