Amazon MQ vs IBM Event Streams comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and IBM are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while IBM is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.6% mindshare in MQ, compared to IBM’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Amazon MQ

Read 7 Amazon MQ reviews

842 Views
582 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

IBM Event Streams

Read 3 IBM Event Streams reviews

220 Views
137 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon MQ

IBM Event Streams

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Amazon MQ and IBM Event Streams compete in message-oriented middleware and event streaming. Amazon MQ has the upper hand in pricing and support, while IBM Event Streams offers advanced features, making it worth the investment for comprehensive use cases.

Features: Amazon MQ provides simplicity, quick scalability, and AWS integration. Its compatibility with various protocols supports diverse applications. IBM Event Streams offers enterprise-grade security, high throughput, and seamless integration with Apache Kafka, appealing to organizations needing efficient event processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon MQ ensures straightforward deployment via AWS, supported by complete documentation and responsive customer support for smooth implementation. IBM Event Streams requires more expertise due to its Kafka infrastructure, but customers benefit from IBM's extensive support network, suitable for complex implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon MQ's pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective, offering significant ROI for smaller setups with less intricate infrastructure. IBM Event Streams entails higher initial costs but provides long-term scalability and advanced capabilities, delivering better ROI for large enterprises requiring comprehensive event streaming solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MQ vs. IBM Event Streams Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. IBM Event Streams

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Event Streams

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Amazon MQ is 3.6%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Event Streams is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

AdnanKhan

Senior System Administrator at Ovrlod

Offers good web hosting capacity and security features, but price needs to be reduced

In terms of Amazon MQ's scalability and throughput capabilities, the tool is mostly accessible, stable, and competent with similar platforms. The tool's web hosting capacity and security features are good. The impact of the solution on process efficiencies depends on the clients. If the traffic is too high for a client, I suggest they go with Azure as it is more scalable and stable, while the support is good. I recommend Azure over Amazon MQ. Starting with Amazon MQ can be a bit tricky, but I know that the product is mature and the support is very good. The integration capabilities of Amazon MQ are flexible. I am not using AI with the tool. I would not recommend Amazon MQ to others. As a service provider, my company usually recommends cheaply priced and reliable solutions to our customers. Azure is one most reliable tool that comes at a good price point. Even Google Cloud is a super solution but for launching Google Cloud, support is not available, so one needs to do it with tutorials which are not completely available in YouTube. I rate the tool a seven and a half out of ten.

Read full review

Ismail El-Dahshan

CEO at areebah

Easy to set up with good support and good routing scenarios

The triggering and the events that they have triggered as well as the route of the message according to the events are very useful. The triggering scenarios and routing scenarios are all good. It's a very useful solution for financial institutions. The initial setup is pretty straightforward. The stability has been good. I've found the product to be scalable. Technical support is responsive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have found Amazon MQ to provide scalability, robustness, and security."

"Amazon MQ is a secure solution."

"Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."

"Amazon MQ is managed by AWS and is easy to use."

"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."

"Amazon MQ is important for being collaborative, allowing for centralized information."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."

"The system efficiently processes and calculates the data flow within the cluster using DLP functionality."

"The stability has been good."

"I'm an administrator, and what I like most is the interface, the security, and the storage."

Cons

"If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great."

"The solution needs improvement in the back end and security."

"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."

"Amazon MQ isn't a cheap tool."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"In community support, especially with distributed systems and integration, there is a need for better system organization."

"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."

"The product's interface needs improvement."

"It would be helpful if they could help us explain why they, as in, the customers, should use the product and the overall benefits."

"In the next release, I would like to see the GUI allow you to configure the security section."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As a client or as an end user, I would say that Google Cloud Storage or Google Cloud are cheaper than Amazon MQ."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"The pricing needs to be improved."

"The platform is averagely priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon MQ?

The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon MQ?

The message queue requires an improvement in the message template MQ link. If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon MQ?

We are using Amazon MQ for our AI model. It's used for notifications and other services. We have an application for which Amazon MQ acts as a broker.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Event Streams?

The system efficiently processes and calculates the data flow within the cluster using DLP functionality.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Event Streams?

The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Event Streams?

The product's interface needs improvement. Additionally, there could be a management console to create and manage clusters.

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon SQS vs Amazon MQ

Compared 31% of the time

IBM MQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 28% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 16% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Amazon MQ

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service vs Amazon MQ

Compared 9% of the time

More Amazon MQ Competitors

Apache Kafka vs IBM Event Streams

Compared 60% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs IBM Event Streams

Compared 40% of the time

More IBM Event Streams Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

June 2025

Download Amazon MQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

June 2025

Download IBM Event Streams product report

Overview

Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Built on open source Apache Kafka, IBM Event Streams is an event-streaming platform that helps you build smart applications that can react to events as they happen. IBM Event Streams is based on years of operational expertise IBM has gained from running Apache Kafka event streams for enterprises

IBM

Sample Customers

SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting

American Airlines, UBank, Bitly, Eurobits, Active International, Bison, Contextor, Constance Hotels, Resorts & Golf, Creval, Deloitte, ExxonMobil, FaceMe, FacePhi, Fitzsoft, Fuga Technologies, Guardio, Honeywell, Japanese airline, Jenzabar, KONE

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. IBM Event Streams

June 2025

Free Report: Amazon MQ vs. IBM Event Streams

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MQ vs. IBM Event Streams and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon MQ vs. IBM Event Streams report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.