Amazon MQ vs SQS comparison

Amazon MQ and Amazon SQS are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Amazon MQ is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while Amazon SQS is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0. Amazon MQ holds a 4.4% mindshare in MQ, compared to Amazon SQS’s 7.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Amazon MQ users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Amazon SQS users who would recommend it.

Amazon MQ

Read 8 Amazon MQ reviews

737 Views
649 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Amazon SQS

Read 31 Amazon SQS reviews

2,405 Views
1,443 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Amazon MQ

Amazon SQS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Amazon MQ and Amazon SQS are messaging solutions within AWS, with Amazon SQS often seen as having an advantage due to its simplicity and scalability.

Features: Amazon MQ supports industry-standard protocols for seamless integration with existing applications and offers rich features for complex applications. It is a full-fledged message broker with robust security. Amazon SQS is known for its simplicity and scalability, providing a straightforward API, low-latency message queuing, and easy implementation for serverless architectures. It offers features like FIFO capabilities and integration with AWS services.

Room for Improvement: Amazon MQ could improve its initial setup process to match the simplicity of SQS and enhance its scalability. It may also require better management of operational overhead. Amazon SQS could benefit from enhanced protocol support and additional features for more complex use cases. A richer set of enterprise-level support options and more advanced administrative tools could further strengthen its offering.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon SQS is more straightforward to deploy, requiring minimal setup, and focuses on rapid scalability, making it ideal for quick implementation. Amazon MQ is more complex to set up due to its feature-rich nature but offers detailed documentation and robust support for integrating with existing systems, benefiting projects needing comprehensive messaging features.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon MQ generally has higher setup costs due to its advanced functionality but delivers high ROI for projects requiring comprehensive messaging capabilities. Amazon SQS provides cost-effective pricing with a pay-as-you-go model, resulting in low initial setup costs and positive ROI for services requiring basic queuing capabilities. Its low cost and efficient scaling make it attractive for budget-conscious projects, with options starting at $0.00000040 per query request.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MQ vs. Amazon SQS Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. Amazon SQS

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,692 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Amazon SQS

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Amazon MQ is 4.4%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Amazon SQS is 7.3%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon SQS	7.3%
Amazon MQ	4.4%
Other	88.3%

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

RamilCerrada

Solution architect at SM Supermalls

Has provided consistent functionality across on-premise and cloud while simplifying cloud integration

I have experience with on-premise setups using ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ, but with regards to AWS, I use it via cloud only. There's a free tier with Amazon MQ based on their website, which is a six-month free trial of a single instance, allowing per month usage of either ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ, five gig of Amazon EFS storage, and for ActiveMQ, it's 20 gig of Amazon EBS storage for RabbitMQ. I did not purchase Amazon MQ through AWS Marketplace. Amazon MQ has published information about having 650 hours of free trial usage. This can be found via the AWS website by searching for AWS MQ. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Amazon MQ an eight out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2281650

IT Specialist at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Efficient data retention and high scalability drive significant productivity improvements

The features of Amazon SQS that I find most valuable include its data retention capabilities and message durability. The retention of data is crucial, as other systems like RabbitMQ or ActiveMQ require management. Furthermore, if there's a failure in the system after consuming a message, SQS's settings ensure the message is not deleted until confirmation. Additionally, generating FIFO and standard queues based on use cases is a helpful feature.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon MQ is managed by AWS and is easy to use."

"Since we utilize AWS, it's easy to integrate Amazon MQ and work with other third-party software, as they have standard communications via API or native language."

"Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."

"We have found Amazon MQ to provide scalability, robustness, and security."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."

"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."

"Amazon MQ is a secure solution."

"Amazon MQ is important for being collaborative, allowing for centralized information."

"I appreciate that Amazon SQS is fully integrated with Amazon and can be accessed through normal functions or serverless functions, making it very user-friendly. Additionally, the features are comparable to those of other solutions."

"The most valuable feature for me is the variety of queues offered, such as the standard and FIFO queues, providing reliable communication."

"It works consistently and is economical under a standard non-FIFO model."

"It's very quick and easy to build or set up Amazon SQS."

"All Amazon Web Services resources are easy to configure."

"Overall, I would rate Amazon SQS as ten out of ten."

"I think the tool is very reliable."

"I like how we can subscribe to multiple topics in Amazon SQS. It's also much simpler and quicker to set up than other solutions. It also supports patterns like Kafka and RapidMQ's fan-out pattern but with easier implementation."

More Amazon SQS pros

Cons

"Amazon MQ isn't a cheap tool."

"The solution needs improvement in the back end and security."

"If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."

"In community support, especially with distributed systems and integration, there is a need for better system organization."

"Monitoring capabilities are not yet fully developed, since it's a message broker service, so it focuses more on the health of Apache."

"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."

"Packages sometimes have delays in dropping, indicating reliability issues."

"There are some issues with SQS's transaction queue regarding knowing if something has been received."

"The solution is not available on-premises so that rules out any customers looking for the messaging solution on-premises."

"The initial setup of Amazon SQS is in the middle range of difficulty. You need to learn Amazon AWS and know how to navigate, create resources, and structures, and provide rules."

"Amazon SQS is costly. I think there could be improvements in how it facilitates comparisons between different AWS products. A calculator would be helpful. The calculator for Kafka is based on factors like throughput or storage used in the last month. In contrast, the calculator for Amazon SQS is based on the number of transactions processed. These different approaches make it challenging to compare them directly. I suggest AWS provide a straightforward calculator where I can input one aspect, and it calculates costs for multiple solutions."

"The retention period for messages could be improved. Currently, messages are retained for four or seven days."

"The current visibility timeout of five minutes is okay. However, I'd like to explore the possibility of extending it for specific use cases."

"There is room for improvement by making use of Kafka services to create more flexible data streams."

More Amazon SQS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As a client or as an end user, I would say that Google Cloud Storage or Google Cloud are cheaper than Amazon MQ."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"The pricing of Amazon SQS is reasonable. The first million requests are free every month, and after, it's cost 40 cents for every million requests. There are not any additional fees."

"Amazon SQS is quite expensive and is at the highest price point compared to other solutions."

"Amazon SQS is more affordable compared to other solutions."

"SQS's pricing is very good - I would rate it nine out of ten."

"Compared to EC2 and other services, Amazon SQS' pricing is cheaper."

"Amazon SQS offers a generous free tier, beyond which it remains very cost-effective. The cost per million messages is less than a dollar, making it an economical choice."

"It's quite expensive."

"Amazon SQS is moderately priced."

More Amazon SQS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,692 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon MQ?

The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon MQ?

Amazon MQ needs to have data collected on performance to analyze trends for improvement. Additionally, some tools can suggest how to improve performance in terms of speed, time, and processing, whi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon MQ?

I have some experience working with Amazon MQ.

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon SQS?

It is stable and scalable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon SQS?

There is nothing I can remember that I would want as new features for Amazon SQS.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon SQS?

If you need a messaging service to help decouple your application, Amazon SQS would be a smart choice because it's easy to use and very easy to manage.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM MQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 18% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Amazon MQ

Compared 15% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Amazon MQ

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service vs Amazon MQ

Compared 11% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 9% of the time

More Amazon MQ Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Amazon SQS

Compared 17% of the time

ActiveMQ vs Amazon SQS

Compared 13% of the time

Redis vs Amazon SQS

Compared 11% of the time

IBM MQ vs Amazon SQS

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Amazon SQS

Compared 10% of the time

More Amazon SQS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

February 2026

Download Amazon MQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Amazon SQS

March 2026

Download Amazon SQS product report

Overview

Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) is a fully managed message queuing service that enables you to decouple and scale microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications. SQS eliminates the complexity and overhead associated with managing and operating message oriented middleware, and empowers developers to focus on differentiating work. Using SQS, you can send, store, and receive messages between software components at any volume, without losing messages or requiring other services to be available. Get started with SQS in minutes using the AWS console, Command Line Interface or SDK of your choice, and three simple commands.

SQS offers two types of message queues. Standard queues offer maximum throughput, best-effort ordering, and at-least-once delivery. SQS FIFO queues are designed to guarantee that messages are processed exactly once, in the exact order that they are sent.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting

EMS, NASA, BMW, Capital One

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. Amazon SQS

March 2026

Free Report: Amazon MQ vs. Amazon SQS

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MQ vs. Amazon SQS and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,692 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon MQ vs. Amazon SQS report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.