Amazon MQ vs SQS comparison

Amazon MQ and Amazon SQS are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Amazon MQ is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5, while Amazon SQS is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0. Amazon MQ holds a 4.4% mindshare in MQ, compared to Amazon SQS’s 7.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Amazon MQ users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Amazon SQS users who would recommend it.

Amazon MQ

Read 8 Amazon MQ reviews

732 Views
637 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Amazon SQS

Read 31 Amazon SQS reviews

2,465 Views
1,454 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Amazon MQ

Amazon SQS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Amazon MQ and Amazon SQS are messaging solutions within AWS, with Amazon SQS often seen as having an advantage due to its simplicity and scalability.

Features: Amazon MQ supports industry-standard protocols for seamless integration with existing applications and offers rich features for complex applications. It is a full-fledged message broker with robust security. Amazon SQS is known for its simplicity and scalability, providing a straightforward API, low-latency message queuing, and easy implementation for serverless architectures. It offers features like FIFO capabilities and integration with AWS services.

Room for Improvement: Amazon MQ could improve its initial setup process to match the simplicity of SQS and enhance its scalability. It may also require better management of operational overhead. Amazon SQS could benefit from enhanced protocol support and additional features for more complex use cases. A richer set of enterprise-level support options and more advanced administrative tools could further strengthen its offering.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon SQS is more straightforward to deploy, requiring minimal setup, and focuses on rapid scalability, making it ideal for quick implementation. Amazon MQ is more complex to set up due to its feature-rich nature but offers detailed documentation and robust support for integrating with existing systems, benefiting projects needing comprehensive messaging features.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon MQ generally has higher setup costs due to its advanced functionality but delivers high ROI for projects requiring comprehensive messaging capabilities. Amazon SQS provides cost-effective pricing with a pay-as-you-go model, resulting in low initial setup costs and positive ROI for services requiring basic queuing capabilities. Its low cost and efficient scaling make it attractive for budget-conscious projects, with options starting at $0.00000040 per query request.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MQ vs. Amazon SQS Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. Amazon SQS

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,565 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Amazon SQS

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Amazon MQ is 4.4%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Amazon SQS is 7.6%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon SQS	7.6%
Amazon MQ	4.4%
Other	88.0%

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

RamilCerrada

Solution architect at SM Supermalls

Has provided consistent functionality across on-premise and cloud while simplifying cloud integration

I have experience with on-premise setups using ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ, but with regards to AWS, I use it via cloud only. There's a free tier with Amazon MQ based on their website, which is a six-month free trial of a single instance, allowing per month usage of either ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ, five gig of Amazon EFS storage, and for ActiveMQ, it's 20 gig of Amazon EBS storage for RabbitMQ. I did not purchase Amazon MQ through AWS Marketplace. Amazon MQ has published information about having 650 hours of free trial usage. This can be found via the AWS website by searching for AWS MQ. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Amazon MQ an eight out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2281650

IT Specialist at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Efficient data retention and high scalability drive significant productivity improvements

The features of Amazon SQS that I find most valuable include its data retention capabilities and message durability. The retention of data is crucial, as other systems like RabbitMQ or ActiveMQ require management. Furthermore, if there's a failure in the system after consuming a message, SQS's settings ensure the message is not deleted until confirmation. Additionally, generating FIFO and standard queues based on use cases is a helpful feature.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."

"We have found Amazon MQ to provide scalability, robustness, and security."

"Amazon MQ is a secure solution."

"Amazon MQ is managed by AWS and is easy to use."

"Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."

"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."

"Since we utilize AWS, it's easy to integrate Amazon MQ and work with other third-party software, as they have standard communications via API or native language."

"Amazon MQ is important for being collaborative, allowing for centralized information."

"Amazon SQS is reliable, with no issues to date."

"It works consistently and is economical under a standard non-FIFO model."

"I appreciate that Amazon SQS is fully integrated with Amazon and can be accessed through normal functions or serverless functions, making it very user-friendly. Additionally, the features are comparable to those of other solutions."

"We use the tool in interface integrations."

"We use SNS as the publisher, and our procurement service subscribes to those events using SQS. In the past, we relied on time-based or batch-based processes to send data between services on-premises. With SQS, we can trigger actions based on real-time changes in business processes, improving reliability."

"I think the tool is very reliable."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to decouple components."

"SQS is very stable, and it has lots of features."

More Amazon SQS pros

Cons

"Amazon MQ isn't a cheap tool."

"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."

"The solution needs improvement in the back end and security."

"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."

"In community support, especially with distributed systems and integration, there is a need for better system organization."

"Monitoring capabilities are not yet fully developed, since it's a message broker service, so it focuses more on the health of Apache."

"If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"There is room for improvement by making use of Kafka services to create more flexible data streams."

"A primary area of improvement for Amazon SQS is the message size limitation, which is currently restricted to 256 kilobytes per message."

"Packages sometimes have delays in dropping, indicating reliability issues."

"The current visibility timeout of five minutes is okay. However, I'd like to explore the possibility of extending it for specific use cases."

"There could be improvements in the UI for security and scalability."

"I cannot send a message to multiple people simultaneously. It can only be sent to one recipient."

"The search should be more user-friendly, allowing me to search for a longer period of time and return results faster."

"There is room for improvement in handling large-scale data."

More Amazon SQS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"As a client or as an end user, I would say that Google Cloud Storage or Google Cloud are cheaper than Amazon MQ."

"Amazon SQS is quite expensive and is at the highest price point compared to other solutions."

"Compared to EC2 and other services, Amazon SQS' pricing is cheaper."

"Compared to the other options and based on what I have heard, Amazon SQS is relatively more expensive, but it is not insanely expensive."

"It's quite expensive."

"Amazon SQS is more affordable compared to other solutions."

"Amazon SQS is moderately priced."

"Amazon SQS offers a generous free tier, beyond which it remains very cost-effective. The cost per million messages is less than a dollar, making it an economical choice."

"SQS's pricing is very good - I would rate it nine out of ten."

More Amazon SQS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon MQ?

The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon MQ?

Amazon MQ needs to have data collected on performance to analyze trends for improvement. Additionally, some tools can suggest how to improve performance in terms of speed, time, and processing, whi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon MQ?

I have some experience working with Amazon MQ.

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon SQS?

It is stable and scalable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon SQS?

There is nothing I can remember that I would want as new features for Amazon SQS.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon SQS?

If you need a messaging service to help decouple your application, Amazon SQS would be a smart choice because it's easy to use and very easy to manage.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM MQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 17% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Amazon MQ

Compared 14% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Amazon MQ

Compared 14% of the time

Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service vs Amazon MQ

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 10% of the time

More Amazon MQ Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Amazon SQS

Compared 16% of the time

Redis vs Amazon SQS

Compared 13% of the time

IBM MQ vs Amazon SQS

Compared 11% of the time

ActiveMQ vs Amazon SQS

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Amazon SQS

Compared 11% of the time

More Amazon SQS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

January 2026

Download Amazon MQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Amazon SQS

January 2026

Download Amazon SQS product report

Overview

Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) is a fully managed message queuing service that enables you to decouple and scale microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications. SQS eliminates the complexity and overhead associated with managing and operating message oriented middleware, and empowers developers to focus on differentiating work. Using SQS, you can send, store, and receive messages between software components at any volume, without losing messages or requiring other services to be available. Get started with SQS in minutes using the AWS console, Command Line Interface or SDK of your choice, and three simple commands.

SQS offers two types of message queues. Standard queues offer maximum throughput, best-effort ordering, and at-least-once delivery. SQS FIFO queues are designed to guarantee that messages are processed exactly once, in the exact order that they are sent.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting

EMS, NASA, BMW, Capital One

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. Amazon SQS

February 2026

Free Report: Amazon MQ vs. Amazon SQS

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MQ vs. Amazon SQS and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon MQ vs. Amazon SQS report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.