• Home
  • Amazon MQ vs. Amazon SQS

Amazon MQ vs SQS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Logo

Amazon MQ

Read 1 Amazon MQ review
7,111 views|6,766 comparisons
Amazon Logo

Amazon SQS

Read 4 Amazon SQS reviews
11,547 views|10,926 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Message Queue (MQ) Software
November 2022
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon MQ and Amazon SQS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Amazon and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Message Queue (MQ) Software Report (Updated: November 2022).
Download the complete report
656,474 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."

More Amazon MQ Pros →

"I am able to find out what's going on very easily.""The solution is easy to scale and cost-effective.""The most valuable feature of Amazon SQS is the interface.""There is no setup just some easy configuration required."

More Amazon SQS Pros →

Cons
"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."

More Amazon MQ Cons →

"I do not think that this solution is easy to use and the documentation of this solution has a lot of problems and can be improved in the next release. Most of the time, the images in the document are from older versions.""It would be easier to have a dashboard that allows us to see everything and manage everything since we have so many queues.""The solution is not available on-premises so that rules out any customers looking for the messaging solution on-premises.""The initial setup of Amazon SQS is in the middle range of difficulty. You need to learn Amazon AWS and know how to navigate, create resources, and structures, and provide rules."

More Amazon SQS Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Amazon SQS is more affordable compared to other solutions."
  • "The pricing of Amazon SQS is reasonable. The first million requests are free every month, and after, it's cost 40 cents for every million requests. There are not any additional fees."
  • "Amazon SQS is quite expensive and is at the highest price point compared to other solutions."

    • More Amazon SQS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    656,474 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Amazon MQ?
    Top Answer:The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance.
    What needs improvement with Amazon MQ?
    Top Answer:I would like to see Amazon MQ introduce other messaging queues like IBM MQ with an easily configured plugin. I would also like to see Amazon MQ offer only one IP instead of two. Right now, they give… more »
    What is your primary use case for Amazon MQ?
    Top Answer:I'm an administrator and my primary use case for Amazon MQ is as an integration layer between applications. I configure the brokers, queues, and users.
    What do you like most about Amazon SQS?
    Top Answer:The solution is easy to scale and cost-effective.
    What needs improvement with Amazon SQS?
    Top Answer:Documentation of this solution can be improved. Sometimes, the images in the document are from older versions.
    What is your primary use case for Amazon SQS?
    Top Answer:The primary use case of this solution is for collecting event data for analytic purposes. In our case, when a user selects a function in our app, the information is collected. Analytics is performed… more »
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 20 in Message Queue (MQ) Software
    Views
    7,111
    Comparisons
    6,766
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    343
    Rating
    8.0
    3rd
    out of 20 in Message Queue (MQ) Software
    Views
    11,547
    Comparisons
    10,926
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    369
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Amazon
    Amazon
    Overview

    Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

    Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) is a fully managed message queuing service that enables you to decouple and scale microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications. SQS eliminates the complexity and overhead associated with managing and operating message oriented middleware, and empowers developers to focus on differentiating work. Using SQS, you can send, store, and receive messages between software components at any volume, without losing messages or requiring other services to be available. Get started with SQS in minutes using the AWS console, Command Line Interface or SDK of your choice, and three simple commands.

    SQS offers two types of message queues. Standard queues offer maximum throughput, best-effort ordering, and at-least-once delivery. SQS FIFO queues are designed to guarantee that messages are processed exactly once, in the exact order that they are sent.

    Offer
    Learn more about Amazon MQ
    Learn More
    Learn more about Amazon SQS
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting
    EMS, NASA, BMW, Capital One
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Media Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Media Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Message Queue (MQ) Software
    November 2022
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Amazon and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: November 2022.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    656,474 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon MQ is ranked 8th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review while Amazon SQS is ranked 3rd in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 4 reviews. Amazon MQ is rated 8.0, while Amazon SQS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon MQ writes "Easy setup; the right option for small and medium-sized enterprises ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Amazon SQS writes "Simple to use and set up with good integration capabilities". Amazon MQ is most compared with Apache Kafka, IBM MQ, VMware RabbitMQ and Red Hat AMQ, whereas Amazon SQS is most compared with Apache Kafka, Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service, IBM MQ, ActiveMQ and Anypoint MQ.

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.