Amazon MQ vs Aurea CX Messenger comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Aurea are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while Aurea is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.4% mindshare in MQ, compared to Aurea’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Aurea users who would recommend it.

Amazon MQ

Read 7 Amazon MQ reviews

1,015 Views
855 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Aurea CX Messenger

Read 7 Aurea CX Messenger reviews

207 Views
71 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon MQ

Aurea CX Messenger

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Aurea CX Messenger and Amazon MQ compete in the message queuing software market. Amazon MQ appears superior in features and pricing, providing greater overall value.

Features: Aurea CX Messenger offers robust message network architecture, reliable message delivery, and exceptional data integrity. Amazon MQ stands out with seamless integration capabilities, powerful cross-platform communication, and high availability.

Room for Improvement: Aurea CX Messenger could enhance its integration and scalability features, simplify its deployment process, and reduce setup time. Amazon MQ could improve its personalized support services, lower operational complexity for less experienced users, and offer more tailored on-premise options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon MQ's cloud-native deployment model simplifies setup and reduces deployment time, complemented by AWS's comprehensive support. Aurea CX Messenger's on-premise model requires more initial configuration and time but provides strong personalized support.

Pricing and ROI: Aurea CX Messenger has higher setup costs due to its on-premise nature, with potential long-term ROI through stable performance. Amazon MQ offers a flexible pricing model with lower initial costs, appealing to businesses seeking scalability without heavy upfront investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MQ vs. Aurea CX Messenger Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. Aurea CX Messenger

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,823 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Aurea CX Messenger

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

9th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Activity Monitoring (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (12th), SOA Governance (3rd), Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Amazon MQ is 3.4%, down from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Aurea CX Messenger is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

AdnanKhan

Senior System Administrator at Ovrlod

Offers good web hosting capacity and security features, but price needs to be reduced

In terms of Amazon MQ's scalability and throughput capabilities, the tool is mostly accessible, stable, and competent with similar platforms. The tool's web hosting capacity and security features are good. The impact of the solution on process efficiencies depends on the clients. If the traffic is too high for a client, I suggest they go with Azure as it is more scalable and stable, while the support is good. I recommend Azure over Amazon MQ. Starting with Amazon MQ can be a bit tricky, but I know that the product is mature and the support is very good. The integration capabilities of Amazon MQ are flexible. I am not using AI with the tool. I would not recommend Amazon MQ to others. As a service provider, my company usually recommends cheaply priced and reliable solutions to our customers. Azure is one most reliable tool that comes at a good price point. Even Google Cloud is a super solution but for launching Google Cloud, support is not available, so one needs to do it with tutorials which are not completely available in YouTube. I rate the tool a seven and a half out of ten.

Read full review

Radhey Rajput

Sr. IT Analyst at NCR Corporation

Lightweight and efficient solution

It's very good and lightweight. But, it does not provide web service communication. But it is excellent for internal connections One valuable feature is the messaging broker. If there is a disruption, it restores the messages. And when the application is running, it delivers all the messages. The…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."

"Amazon MQ is a secure solution."

"Amazon MQ is important for being collaborative, allowing for centralized information."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."

"We have found Amazon MQ to provide scalability, robustness, and security."

"Amazon MQ is managed by AWS and is easy to use."

"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."

"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."

"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."

"The solution offers excellent stability."

"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."

"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."

"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."

Cons

"In community support, especially with distributed systems and integration, there is a need for better system organization."

"The solution needs improvement in the back end and security."

"Amazon MQ isn't a cheap tool."

"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."

"If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."

"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."

"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"

"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."

"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."

"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."

"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"As a client or as an end user, I would say that Google Cloud Storage or Google Cloud are cheaper than Amazon MQ."

"You pay nothing for licensing, because the commercial model is a subscription. Other environments, such as QA and Development, are included in the subscription"

"Much better than Oracle SOA Suite."

"The pricing is not so high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Insurance Company

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon MQ?

The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon MQ?

The message queue requires an improvement in the message template MQ link. If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon MQ?

We are using Amazon MQ for our AI model. It's used for notifications and other services. We have an application for which Amazon MQ acts as a broker.

See all answers

What do you like most about Aurea CX Messenger?

The Messenger Broker is a really good feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aurea CX Messenger?

The pricing is not so high. I will rate it a seven out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest. There are no additional fees to the standard license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aurea CX Messenger?

The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services because the earlier version is not using web service and cloud functionality. If Aurea could include these features in the fut...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon SQS vs Amazon MQ

Compared 32% of the time

IBM MQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 30% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 17% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Amazon MQ

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service vs Amazon MQ

Compared 9% of the time

More Amazon MQ Competitors

TIBCO eFTL vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 37% of the time

IBM MQ vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 34% of the time

ActiveMQ vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 29% of the time

More Aurea CX Messenger Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

May 2025

Download Amazon MQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Activity Monitoring

April 2025

Download Aurea CX Messenger product report

Also Known As

No data available

CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ

Overview

Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

Aurea

Sample Customers

SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting

Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. Aurea CX Messenger

April 2025

Free Report: Amazon MQ vs. Aurea CX Messenger

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MQ vs. Aurea CX Messenger and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon MQ vs. Aurea CX Messenger report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.