Amazon Aurora vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and SAP are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while SAP is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.0% mindshare in SQL, compared to SAP’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Amazon Aurora

Read 18 Amazon Aurora reviews

2,410 Views
1,575 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Read 12 SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise reviews

1,046 Views
273 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Amazon Aurora

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and Amazon Aurora are competing in the database management space. Amazon Aurora appears to have an advantage with its scalability and serverless architecture, catering to modern cloud applications.

Features: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise offers comprehensive security, large data handling capabilities, and efficient transaction management. Amazon Aurora provides high availability, automatic replication, and compatibility with MySQL and PostgreSQL, allowing for easy scalability and integration with diverse applications.

Room for Improvement: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise could enhance its cloud integration and update its features to match competitors better. Its deployment can also be more modernized. Amazon Aurora might benefit from offering more customization options, reducing complexity for first-time users, and enhancing cost transparency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon Aurora provides seamless deployment through AWS with extensive documentation and agile support, enhancing operational efficiency. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise requires traditional deployment methods backed by comprehensive support services.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise involves a significant upfront investment, yielding strong ROI through stability in long-term use. Amazon Aurora's flexible, scalable pricing model aligns with dynamic workloads, offering cost benefits for varied demands over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Aurora vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Aurora

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

20th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon Aurora is 3.0%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is 0.9%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Adnan Shafiq

Associate Vice President - Database Management (Principal Solutions Architect) at Northbay

High availability and geographical redundancy ensure reliable performance and cost efficiency

Amazon Aurora ( /products/amazon-aurora-reviews ) provides up to fifteen to sixteen read replicas. It replicates data across multiple Availability Zones, ensuring high availability and geographical redundancy, which can be considered a GR instead of a DR. As a managed service, maintenance tasks like backup and restore are handled by AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ), saving my organization significant time and money. Additionally, its fast cloning feature allows us to create a new clone from a large database swiftly, similar to a zero-copy cloning feature in Snowflake ( /products/snowflake-reviews ). This makes Amazon Aurora a compelling choice for my organization.

Read full review

Tejas Raj

Manager at Capgemini

Offers cost-efficiency as it needs a very small amount of RAM to function

SAP is least bothered about Adaptive Server Enterprise nowadays since it wants to focus on promoting its new product, which is S/4HANA. If SAP gives out new releases and a patch upgrade to improve performance and provide additional options, then SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise can compete with other relational database systems in the market. The overall performance of the product is an area where the tool has certain shortcomings and needs to improve. I work in a very stable environment, and I prefer a very stable replication and database management system. Most of our company's customers do not want to opt out of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise, but SAP has announced that it will be ending its support for it in 2027, and though I feel SAP might extend it, I feel SAP will want to promote its new product. Previously, I heard that SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise's end-of-support dates were announced for 2025, but now I think that they have extended it to 2027 or 2030.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The provision of custom read and write endpoints eliminates the need for managing a separate proxy load balancer."

"Aurora's features that I find the most beneficial include its database backup strategy, performance options, and input-output operations."

"One of the standout features of Amazon Aurora is that we do not need to maintain disaster recovery or manage availability zones."

"We had better control over the parameters that we could tweak in terms of intermediate storage and better indexing capabilities."

"Aurora is a key pillar for us, offering performance and availability."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon Aurora is SQL standardization, it doesn't have its own syntax which is good. It has a lot of hands-off self-management type of activities, such as log rolling and auto-scaling."

"Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code."

"The most valuable features of Amazon Aurora include the global instance with the global writer endpoint, which allows failovers and instance switches without requiring changes in my code, thanks to the default global Route 53 endpoint."

More Amazon Aurora pros

"The actual interface is good."

"They provide easy integration with other systems."

"I like that SAP ASE can match code and the database index to index data in the programming language. There are many other valuable features, such as the table buffer, tuning, and various control agents like dispatcher. SAP ASE can handle many different data types, including views, domains, data elements, structures, objects, and various table types that are most useful in the application. Its modularization technique is also handy."

"This is a wonderful database that is, in my opinion, underrated. Users are able to get the most out of my experience by taking advantage of its centralized environment."

"It's user-friendly, especially in the logistics field."

"It's pretty good at handling a large number of transactions, which is critical for a banking client."

"Provides very good integration."

"The most valuable part of the tool stems from the fact that it is a very cost-efficient product compared to the newer technologies because it needs a very small amount of RAM."

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise pros

Cons

"Amazon Aurora should upgrade its base PostgreSQL versions more frequently and offer all PostgreSQL extensions."

"A challenge I noticed is during migration from PostgreSQL RDS to Amazon Aurora. There are technical challenges, such as the inability to provision the database using a PostgreSQL snapshot directly."

"While Amazon Aurora meets your current scaling and storage needs, there is room for improvement in cryptography and scalability compared to other databases."

"Room for improvement might be in the UI, integrations, or data working capabilities for better user experience."

"It is a bit costly. The features are quite good, and I wouldn't say it requires any technical improvements. But from a cost perspective, some clients wouldn't go for Aurora because of that."

"I would like to see more AI-related features in future releases."

"The pricing could improve. It should be reduced."

"There are tuning challenges."

More Amazon Aurora cons

"The overall performance of the product is an area where the tool has certain shortcomings and needs to improve."

"User interface could be more user friendly."

"SAP should refine its debugging method, and the process needs to be a little faster. It should use more Pragmas and fewer pseudocomments. I would like if SAP added more features based on advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence and voice control. The modularization and if-else techniques could also incorporate the latest technology to code and solve complex problems. The SAP Editor should be more elaborative, and it should allow many more types of statements for all uses."

"Because the solution is customized. we do occasionally face unique bugs. There are always some changes that need to be made here and there."

"Cost-wise, SAP is still expensive compared to other available products."

"There could be some improvements in barcode scanning and RFID access."

"The solution should improve view partitioning. The documentation is very confined and available only for users. Distributors also would like access to it."

"In my opinion, product support is not that great from SAP because they have already declared the end-of-date for SAP ASE. They will be stopping product support."

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"The price could be lower compared to its competitors."

"The tool’s pricing depends on the instance type. For cost optimization purposes, we use the result instance category."

"It is an expensive solution."

"It is quite expensive."

"There is no need to buy a license for the product. We can pay as per the use case."

"Price-wise, the product is worth it since one needs very less infrastructure to use it."

"I rate SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise's pricing a six out of ten."

"The licensing cost for ASE is pretty low."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Aurora?

Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Aurora?

Amazon Aurora is not very expensive as other solutions with similar features from other vendors come at almost the same cost. I rated it as two to three on a scale where ten is very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Aurora?

Amazon Aurora should upgrade its base PostgreSQL ( /products/postgresql-reviews ) versions more frequently and offer all PostgreSQL extensions. Keeping extensions up-to-date with PostgreSQL release...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is a good transactional database.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

The licensing cost for ASE is pretty low when you compare it with Microsoft SQL Server. If you compare it with SQL Server, it is pretty low.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

The main thing is it's not getting upgraded to meet today's needs. It's not upgrading at the level of transaction needs. For example, PostgreSQL or Oracle, these are pretty good databases. They can...

See all answers

Comparisons

SQL Server vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 31% of the time

Oracle Database vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 21% of the time

MariaDB vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 7% of the time

Citus Data vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 7% of the time

YugabyteDB vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 7% of the time

More Amazon Aurora Competitors

SAP HANA vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 55% of the time

SAP SQL Anywhere vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 18% of the time

SAP IQ vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 14% of the time

SQL Server vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora

June 2025

Download Amazon Aurora product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

May 2025

Download SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAP ASE

Overview

Amazon Aurora is a MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud, that combines the performance and availability of traditional enterprise databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases.

Amazon Aurora is up to five times faster than standard MySQL databases and three times faster than standard PostgreSQL databases. It provides the security, availability, and reliability of commercial databases at 1/10th the cost. Amazon Aurora is fully managed by Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS), which automates time-consuming administration tasks like hardware provisioning, database setup, patching, and backups.

Amazon Aurora features a distributed, fault-tolerant, self-healing storage system that auto-scales up to 64TB per database instance. It delivers high performance and availability with up to 15 low-latency read replicas, point-in-time recovery, continuous backup to Amazon S3, and replication across three Availability Zones (AZs).

Visit the Amazon RDS Management Console to create your first Aurora database instance and start migrating your MySQL and PostgreSQL databases.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE) is a high-performance relational database management system designed for mission-critical, data-intensive environments. It provides a centralized environment for storing and managing data, with the ability to handle a wide range of data types and a modularization technique allowing easy customization.

SAP ASE is particularly valuable for financial operations, as it offers integrated financial features. The solution also offers various control agents and the ability to match code and database index. SAP ASE has improved daily data collection and program functionality for many organizations.

SAP

Sample Customers

Dow Jones, Arizona State University, Verizon, Capital One, United Nations, Nielsen, Autodesk, Fanduel

City of Buenos Aires, ASR Group, Citrix, EarlySense, Usha International Limited, Automotive Resources International (ARI), Takisada-Osaka Co. Ltd., Coelba (Grupo Neoenergia), RZD Russian Railways, National Basketball Association - NBA, TALLY

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

June 2025

Free Report: Amazon Aurora vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Aurora vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Aurora vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.