We performed a comparison between SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is a good transactional database."
"They provide easy integration with other systems."
"I like that SAP ASE can match code and the database index to index data in the programming language. There are many other valuable features, such as the table buffer, tuning, and various control agents like dispatcher. SAP ASE can handle many different data types, including views, domains, data elements, structures, objects, and various table types that are most useful in the application. Its modularization technique is also handy."
"This is a wonderful database that is, in my opinion, underrated. Users are able to get the most out of my experience by taking advantage of its centralized environment."
"Provides very good integration."
"The actual interface is good."
"It's user-friendly, especially in the logistics field."
"The feature that I like the most is that we can transport the data to our web data application. SAP HANA's performance is really perfect. We're working on big data, and SAP HANA is really working on high performance. We are happy working with it."
"The solution is extremely stable. That's the most important aspect of the solution, for our organization. There is no downtime, and the performance is very good."
"The most valuable feature of SAP HANA is the interaction it provides with external suppliers and clients."
"What I like most are the dashboards and pervasive analytics."
"It's easy to use, and the Hana Studio is pretty good."
"The main feature is that the processes are very flexible, they are able to be adapted to the business and their departments."
"The user interface is very good. You can do any kind of reporting analytics from the platform."
"The most valuable features I have found are speed, dashboard, and reporting."
"I think that the solution needs to be positioned better within the market as it appears as though the Adaptive Server is being left out of the SAP scope."
"Because the solution is customized. we do occasionally face unique bugs. There are always some changes that need to be made here and there."
"User interface could be more user friendly."
"The solution should improve view partitioning. The documentation is very confined and available only for users. Distributors also would like access to it."
"Cost-wise, SAP is still expensive compared to other available products."
"There could be some improvements in barcode scanning and RFID access."
"SAP should refine its debugging method, and the process needs to be a little faster. It should use more Pragmas and fewer pseudocomments. I would like if SAP added more features based on advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence and voice control. The modularization and if-else techniques could also incorporate the latest technology to code and solve complex problems. The SAP Editor should be more elaborative, and it should allow many more types of statements for all uses."
"The product lacks some flexibility in its settings and configurations."
"It would be nice to know when SAP plans to stop its maintenance of a previous version of SAP ECC ERP because, at this point, anyone utilizing SAP will have no choice but to go on S/4HANA Database."
"The performance and integration with other products are areas in need of improvement."
"If the developers were to enhance or improve the application logic while processing the transactions, that would be great."
"The initial setup was very, very complex, tedious, and costly and required someone with great expertise to complete it."
"The interface is a little bit hard to customize. You almost have to consult the SAP original developer to change it."
"The solution's development platform should be more flexible and scalable to adapt to other solutions."
"The documentation can be improved in the future."
More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is ranked 17th in Relational Databases Tools with 10 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 79 reviews. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is rated 8.6, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise writes " Loaded with a lot of features but the price is a drawback ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is most compared with SQL Server, SAP SQL Anywhere, Oracle Database, IBM Db2 Database and SAP IQ, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Oracle Database In-Memory. See our SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.