"This is a wonderful database that is, in my opinion, underrated. Users are able to get the most out of my experience by taking advantage of its centralized environment."
"Provides very good integration."
"I like that SAP ASE can match code and the database index to index data in the programming language. There are many other valuable features, such as the table buffer, tuning, and various control agents like dispatcher. SAP ASE can handle many different data types, including views, domains, data elements, structures, objects, and various table types that are most useful in the application. Its modularization technique is also handy."
"The solution is easy to set up."
"It works fine in terms of performance and stability."
"They have improved the UI and ease of accessing the database and server which is good. You can load it up and start using it from the very minute it is implemented."
"The solution seems to be pretty flexible."
"It is integrated with Microsoft tools."
"The most valuable feature of SQL Server is the performance."
"The solution is stable. It's reliable."
"The main feature of this solution is ease of use."
"I think that the solution needs to be positioned better within the market as it appears as though the Adaptive Server is being left out of the SAP scope."
"User interface could be more user friendly."
"SAP should refine its debugging method, and the process needs to be a little faster. It should use more Pragmas and fewer pseudocomments. I would like if SAP added more features based on advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence and voice control. The modularization and if-else techniques could also incorporate the latest technology to code and solve complex problems. The SAP Editor should be more elaborative, and it should allow many more types of statements for all uses."
"In terms of exceptionally large databases, it doesn't scale as well as Oracle."
"They could improve the solution by allowing more portability between on-premise and the cloud."
"More things in SQL Server need to be automated."
"The remote access aspect needs to be improved in terms of security."
"The interface could be updated to make it slightly more user-friendly."
"Security is an issue."
"The product overall would benefit from the addition of better tutorials to help master the skills necessary to actually build a project database. Right now, what is available isn't sufficient."
"There are a lot of improvements in the cloud space about which we open a case with Microsoft every now and then. These improvements are not in terms of features or functionality. They are more related to their own compatibility or connectivity on which they keep on working to improve the product."
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is ranked 15th in Relational Databases with 3 reviews while SQL Server is ranked 1st in Relational Databases with 172 reviews. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is rated 8.0, while SQL Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise writes "Provides integration and ease of access to reporting; UI could be more user friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Server writes "Good performance, well-priced, trivial to set up, and helpful support". SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is most compared with SAP HANA, IBM Db2 Database, Oracle Database, SAP SQL Anywhere and SAP IQ, whereas SQL Server is most compared with SAP HANA, Oracle Database, LocalDB, IBM Db2 Database and MariaDB. See our SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise vs. SQL Server report.
See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
