We performed a comparison between Amazon Aurora and CockroachDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The most valuable feature is that the maintainability is offloaded to the service provider. I don't have to maintain a database or do any administrative tasks, which comes in handy."
"I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance."
"It is a bit costly. The features are quite good, and I wouldn't say it requires any technical improvements. But from a cost perspective, some clients wouldn't go for Aurora because of that."
"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."
Amazon Aurora is ranked 10th in Relational Databases Tools with 1 review while CockroachDB is ranked 9th in Relational Databases Tools with 1 review. Amazon Aurora is rated 9.0, while CockroachDB is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Amazon Aurora writes "Provides maintainability that is offloaded to the service provider and comes with disaster recovery feasibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CockroachDB writes "Distributed database solution used to sample big data sets and structure databases". Amazon Aurora is most compared with MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle Database, Citus Data and YugabyteDB, whereas CockroachDB is most compared with Oracle Database, Citus Data, SQL Server, MySQL and Teradata.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
