Aerospike Database 7 vs Couchbase Enterprise comparison

Aerospike and Couchbase are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Aerospike is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Couchbase is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1. Aerospike holds a 3.5% mindshare in ND, compared to Couchbase’s 8.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aerospike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Couchbase users who would recommend it.

Aerospike Database 7

Read 1 Aerospike Database 7 review

565 Views
514 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Couchbase Enterprise

Read 18 Couchbase Enterprise reviews

1,849 Views
1,831 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Aerospike Database 7

Couchbase Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 31, 2025

Aerospike Database 7 and Couchbase Enterprise compete in the NoSQL database market, each offering unique benefits. Aerospike holds an advantage in high-throughput, cost-effective scenarios, while Couchbase leads with a comprehensive feature set for complex applications.

Features: Aerospike Database 7 is recognized for high-speed data processing, reliable performance under heavy loads, and hybrid memory models crucial for real-time analytics. Couchbase Enterprise stands out with built-in full-text search, mobile sync capabilities, and eventing features that support flexible, scalable applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aerospike Database 7 provides straightforward deployment with scalability and fast setup, though its customer service might be limited. Couchbase Enterprise offers complex deployment models supporting diverse environments and provides extensive customer service options valued for implementation support.

Pricing and ROI: Aerospike Database 7 is known for competitive pricing and favorable ROI due to efficient resource usage and lower operational costs. Couchbase Enterprise, while involving higher setup costs, promises substantial ROI through advanced feature sets and scalability for complex applications.

To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,140 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aerospike Database 7

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Couchbase Enterprise

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Aerospike Database 7 is 3.5%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Couchbase Enterprise is 8.7%, down from 12.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Manikandan Gunasekaran

Director of Engineering at Ola

Boost authentication and session management with reliable and fast data handling

There is a lot of technical debt in our company, and we need to update to the latest versions. The lack of automation in upgrading clusters from development to production is a concern. A tool for automatically handling such upgrades would reduce operational huddle. Additionally, it would be beneficial if Aerospike had a community version to encourage broader adoption and experimentation.

Read full review

Ravi_Singh

Manager at Tesco

Supports multiple data models and offers AI capabilities

With some of the operations, we used to face some challenges with scalability. Although it worked pretty well, in some scenarios, we noticed issues where the replications and the sharding were not happening correctly. In recent versions, we also faced some issues in terms of enabling advanced operations like FTS and vectors. Although it works pretty well, in some places, we do face challenges, especially on a heavy scale. I think all issues are being addressed in the latest version of Couchbase. The resources are not that good for Couchbase. The tool's documentation is pretty extensive, but if you go for any kind of courses or tutorials, there are very limited resources available. It also becomes a little bit challenging for new people to get onboard into it. MongoDB and other such open-source database tools perform really well as they're really widely adopted, and they have resources available to get you onboarded pretty quickly. I think that we do face some challenges with Couchbase, but luckily, we have the tool's enterprise version solution, so we get all the support from the product team.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It shows better compression and compaction, which is valuable."

"It is pretty stable."

"The main advantages were associated with it being a no SQL database. It helped us send out metrics or rewards to multiple players in our game at a very low latency."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"It can scale horizontally, and we are looking to expand our capacity."

"The most valuable features are the ease of application and the merging of data."

"I have found the views to be very valuable."

"Sync Gateway is a great feature that supports the mobile application."

"The most valuable feature of Couchbase is document indexing. It is better than MongoDB. Additionally, the solution is easy to use."

More Couchbase Enterprise pros

Cons

"The lack of automation in upgrading clusters from development to production is a concern."

"Couchbase needs to improve the consistent reliability of the replication feature. Sometimes, the replications would be delayed."

"The main problem has been with integration with the services."

"It is very difficult to load the backup of the older version to the newer version."

"The performance could be quicker and better, especially in the querying process."

"Overall as a tool, I see room for improvement in Couchbase in certain aspects."

"The scripting language for this solution could be improved. A big selling point is that they're like SQL server but there is still quite a lot of missing functionality."

"The failover and failback could be a bit easier. When I looked at it last time, it had to be manually done. It also took over an hour for us to rebalance all the nodes."

"Couchbase could improve the design of the UI because it should be optimized for viewing statistics or a similar feature."

More Couchbase Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use around half a TB of data and spend approximately $36,000 to $40,000 USD per year on Aerospike."

"It seems very reasonable. It's a lot cheaper than Redis, but we've got an enterprise license. So, it's about normal. It's not outrageous in price as far as we've seen. From Couchbase, there's no additional fee as far as I'm aware, but when you're integrating, there's an additional fee because a lot of times, they don't have an integration stack."

"I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for pricing as it is affordable."

"The licensing cost of Couchbase is quite expensive compared to other databases."

"I wouldn't say Couchbase offers good value for money."

"We estimate that it's not very expensive, however, the pricing that you can get from the account managers, e.g. the public pricing, could be a bit expensive."

"It can range between 25,000 to 40,000 Euros per year depending on company requirements."

"The price of this solution is better than some of the other competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aerospike Database 7?

We use around half a TB of data and spend approximately $36,000 to $40,000 USD per year on Aerospike.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aerospike Database 7?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Aerospike Database 7?

Aerospike is mainly used as the first step for authentication, authorization, and session persistence in our organization. It is a critical part of our workflow, as without it, we wouldn't be able ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Couchbase?

The main issue we keep facing from the past couple of years, observing other teams using Couchbase, is that whenever there is an upgrade, we see many issues with compatibility or nodes not intercon...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Couchbase?

Basically we have clusters, Couchbase clusters, databases, and that is how we use Couchbase with XDCR. All the clusters are set up and then we use Couchbase. It is a complex application setup we us...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Couchbase?

It is a good solution, but as every product needs improvement, this also needs some enhancement. It is a good product. I rate Couchbase seven out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

ScyllaDB vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 29% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 17% of the time

Neo4j Graph Database vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 13% of the time

Apache HBase vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 11% of the time

More Aerospike Database 7 Competitors

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 25% of the time

Cassandra vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 17% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

Redis vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle NoSQL vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More Couchbase Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

August 2025

Download Aerospike Database 7 product report

Buyer's Guide

Couchbase Enterprise

August 2025

Download Couchbase Enterprise product report

Overview

Aerospike is an enterprise-class, NoSQL database solution for real-time operational applications that delivers predictable performance at scale, superior uptime, and high availability at the lowest Total Cost of Ownership compared to first-generation NoSQL and relational databases.

Aerospike

Couchbase Enterprise offers powerful data management capabilities with features like horizontal scalability, ease of use, and flexible tools for business applications. Designed for high performance and reliability, it supports multi-master capability and low latency, making it ideal for dynamic environments.

Designed for businesses needing crucial data management, Couchbase Enterprise offers advanced indexing, analytics engines, and efficient storage for performance enhancement. It provides flexibility with data types, robust data sync, and supports a dynamic API for seamless integration. Its intuitive query language simplifies operations, ensuring businesses navigate effortlessly while enjoying high availability and extensive features. Despite this, challenges exist in areas like manual failover processes, complex upgrades, and UI limitations, necessitating enhancements in concurrency, integration, and security features. Performance issues on certain platforms add to the need for improved documentation and support.

What are Couchbase Enterprise’s most important features?

Horizontal Scalability: Allows easy scaling across different servers to handle large data volumes.
Advanced Analytics Engine: Drives insightful business decisions by processing complex data rapidly.
Efficient Data Storage: Enhances system performance by optimizing data organization and retrieval.
Multi-Master Capability: Ensures data consistency and reliability across several nodes.
Dynamic API Integration: Facilitates seamless integration with other applications for extended functionality.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Performance Efficiency: Low latency capabilities ensure smooth operations for business applications.
High Availability: Robust infrastructure supports uninterrupted service and minimal downtime.
Data Flexibility: Supports diverse data types, enhancing adaptability to business needs.
Real-Time Data Replication: Ensures timely data updates across multiple platforms, enhancing workflow.
Reliable Customer Support: Provides technical assistance, improving user experience and system utilization.

Couchbase Enterprise is deployed across industries for its excellent data handling capabilities. It empowers telemedicine, e-commerce, gaming, and telecommunications sectors by offering efficient data link utilization, caching, and logging. Some companies leverage its real-time data replication with Elasticsearch for high-performance operational needs, while others benefit from its capabilities in managing reads and writes in iGaming. Retail industries use its document-based storage for structured inventory management, and cloud migrations are simplified with support from Capella.

Couchbase

Sample Customers

AppNexus, Adform, KAYAK, Williams-Sonoma Inc., The Trade Desk, GREE, BlueKai, Chango CTO, InMobi, Yashi, eXelate CTO, Snapdeal, adMarketplace, Tapad, Komli Media, Neustar, So-net Media Networks, IMHO Vi, Vizury

Amadeus, Cisco, Comcast, LinkedIn, GE

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, Microsoft and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.