Couchbase Enterprise vs ScyllaDB comparison

Read 12 ScyllaDB reviews

2,999 Views
2,939 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Couchbase Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Couchbase Enterprise and ScyllaDB are prominent contenders in the database solutions category. Based on the features and performance, ScyllaDB seems to have the upper hand due to its high-speed performance in high-volume scenarios, while Couchbase shines in application integration and versatility.

Features: Couchbase Enterprise provides robust horizontal scalability with a dynamic API for flexible document handling, a user-friendly query language, and high-speed operations ideal for analytics. ScyllaDB excels in performance, optimizing I/O operations and data ingestion using its unique architecture. It is favorable for distributed systems due to its scalability and performance reliability.

Room for Improvement: Couchbase users highlight issues with upgrades, documentation gaps, and security model limitations affecting integration. They also note challenges in replication reliability and high integration costs. ScyllaDB users face complex setup requirements, documentation gaps, and inefficient management of deletions. Pricing and ROI factors also pose concerns, particularly regarding compaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Couchbase supports deployment across public, private, and hybrid clouds. Customer support experiences vary, with delays in response and a need for better tailored solutions. ScyllaDB supports hybrid and on-premises environments but necessitates self-management due to limited enterprise support, impacting small-scale deployment cost efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: Couchbase offers multiple licensing models aimed at reducing operational costs despite additional integration expenses. While premium, they can provide strong ROI through enhanced speed and reduced costs. ScyllaDB pricing is akin to MongoDB, yet high support costs and setup complexity balance its strong database performance advantages in critical applications.

To learn more, read our detailed Couchbase Enterprise vs. ScyllaDB Report (Updated: November 2026).

Couchbase Enterprise vs. ScyllaDB

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Couchbase Enterprise

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScyllaDB

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Couchbase Enterprise is 5.8%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScyllaDB is 5.6%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Couchbase Enterprise	5.8%
ScyllaDB	5.6%
Other	88.6%

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Nitansshu Jain

Experienced Software Developer at Amdocs

Integrated caching and SQL-style queries have improved real-time billing performance

Couchbase Enterprise can be improved by addressing the complex setup. The initial setup and configuration can be tricky and requires careful tuning of cluster settings, memory quotas, and indexes, which I have already faced. Another area for improvement is the learning curve. Although N1QL is powerful, there is still a learning curve, especially for developers coming from traditional relational databases. The licensing cost is something to consider as well. Enterprise licensing can be expensive and may not be ideal for startups or smaller organizations. There is operational overhead with Couchbase Enterprise, such as managing clusters, monitoring performance, and handling failovers, which require strong DevOps expertise. It would be better if it simplified these aspects and provided better documentation.

Read full review

Manikandan Gunasekaran

Director of Engineering at Ola

Reliable data management with great reliability and performance

From a sales pitch standpoint, it needs to deliver on promises of better ROI and compaction. Additionally, ticketing and support systems could be improved due to the time it takes to get answers. There's also an issue with compatibility when attempting to switch back from the enterprise to the community version.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is pretty stable."

"Couchbase Enterprise offers very fast retrieval of feature configurations, which is why we choose it over other NoSQL databases available."

"The whole stack is valuable, but the portion of the stack that we're finding really handy is the analytics engine because that allows us to take and pre-build views."

"The principal advantage of Couchbase is that we can have multiple database paradigms in the same product, without deploying multiple databases. We also like that it has lower latency, when compared to its competitor: Cassandra."

"Couchbase Enterprise has positively impacted our organization by reducing latency by 60%; with its inbuilt cache, our performance improved significantly by 50%, and the time taken to search in Couchbase was also reduced, leading to an overall performance improvement of 78.3%."

"Previously, we used SQL persistent databases, which were not optimized, but since the company shifted to Couchbase Enterprise, the application latency decreased by 70 to 80%, helping the organization attract better clients."

"I am very happy with this solution, and I would rate Couchbase a nine out of ten."

"It can scale horizontally, and we are looking to expand our capacity."

More Couchbase Enterprise pros

"The database is easy to use, fast, and accessible for applications because the API is straightforward."

"The documentation is good. It integrates easily with our existing data infrastructure."

"The best features of ScyllaDB are how it synchronizes data and its failover system. There's a unique formula to decide the number of nodes you need and the minimum required, which I find helpful. It also offers encryption and supports APIs, making it great for distributed systems and scaling databases across different regions. While it's easy to use, having prior experience helps configure it properly. There are many configurations; if you don't understand them, you might mess up the design. So, understanding your system's needs, like whether it requires more read or write operations, is crucial for setting up the correct configuration."

"ScyllaDB is fast and reliable. It has good performance."

"ScyllaDB allows fine-tuning of the table structure. Speed is probably the most critical factor because we perform a lot of heavy data ingestion. One of its core features is its ability to handle high volumes and maintain speed when accessing data. Additionally, high availability and partitioning are built-in features of ScyllaDB."

"It is lightweight, and it requires less infrastructure."

"The product's most valuable features are efficiency and reliability."

"The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively."

More ScyllaDB pros

Cons

"The scripting language for this solution could be improved. A big selling point is that they're like SQL server but there is still quite a lot of missing functionality."

"The main issue we keep facing from the past couple of years, observing other teams using Couchbase, is that whenever there is an upgrade, we see many issues with compatibility or nodes not interconnecting after the upgrade."

"The main problem has been with integration with the services."

"We would like to have a better management of Kubernetes with the free, open source version of Couchbase. We don't have any major complaints other than that."

"Couchbase Enterprise is a great product overall, however I suggest improvements as there were some instances when retrieving data was slow, especially for a few created buckets on localhost and in production, but these were rare occurrences."

"Couchbase Enterprise can improve by being a little lighter for use cases as it requires heavy customization."

"There are some limitations to the database. The SQL database cannot handle real-time processing for critical IoT scenarios. What we have to do is store our data into the database then code it out, this wastes a lot of time."

"One thing that could improved upon is the level of concurrency. The documentation for this solution could also be improved."

More Couchbase Enterprise cons

"We've had occasional performance challenges that required resource adjustments or optimizations in our interaction with the platform."

"Data export, along with how we can purchase the data periodically, needs to be improved so that the storage is within control. Then, we could optimize it even better."

"The product needs to add more features and improve the response time of the support team."

"Support and the availability of support need improvement. I would give them a six out of ten."

"It seems we have better options available. So probably don't go for ScyllaDB. The reason is, first, it's very high. It's not as straightforward as, like, Postgres or ClickHouse to set up. It requires a complex setup."

"From a sales pitch standpoint, it needs to deliver on promises of better ROI and compaction."

"If you don't have the best computing resources, then it's not easy to set up. In such cases, we have to run ScyllaDB in developer mode."

"The documentation is not well established for new developers."

More ScyllaDB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this solution is better than some of the other competitors."

"I wouldn't say Couchbase offers good value for money."

"It seems very reasonable. It's a lot cheaper than Redis, but we've got an enterprise license. So, it's about normal. It's not outrageous in price as far as we've seen. From Couchbase, there's no additional fee as far as I'm aware, but when you're integrating, there's an additional fee because a lot of times, they don't have an integration stack."

"We estimate that it's not very expensive, however, the pricing that you can get from the account managers, e.g. the public pricing, could be a bit expensive."

"I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for pricing as it is affordable."

"The licensing cost of Couchbase is quite expensive compared to other databases."

"It's a bit expensive."

"I believe that there is a yearly licensing cost and that it's expensive."

"It's free."

"The paid version of ScyllaDB is not that expensive. The main advantage of the paid version is direct support from the ScyllaDB team, which can resolve issues faster—typically within a day, compared to two to three days with the free version. The paid version also offers better guidance and support, while the free version has good documentation and is more high-level. I’d rate their support team nine out of ten because of the quick responses from their community."

"It is an expensive tool compared to its competitor."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Transportation Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Couchbase?

Bucket concepts such as bucket, scope, collection, VBucket are very new to users and take time to understand. Better guided onboarding and simplified documentation with real-world examples could he...

What is your primary use case for Couchbase?

I have used Couchbase Enterprise in a different way. I used it in Informatica to set up an end-to-end flow for the connector. Informatica used to connect to Couchbase for all three applications: II...

What advice do you have for others considering Couchbase?

Organizations that Couchbase Enterprise is best suited for include medium to high e-commerce companies, streaming services, some financial companies, though banking may not be the primary focus. Mo...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Scylla?

From what I’ve seen (and experienced), ScyllaDB pricing is very dependent on how you deploy it, and that’s where most of the confusion comes from.

What needs improvement with Scylla?

What is your primary use case for Scylla?

We dump a lot of our data, such as every entry created with respect to when a user rides a scooter, every record gets updated to ScyllaDB. It is used as a single source of truth and it manages mass...

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Couchbase Enterprise

Comparisons

Compared 12% of the time

Cassandra vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

Aerospike Database vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

CouchDB vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

More Couchbase Enterprise Competitors

Redis vs ScyllaDB

Compared 14% of the time

Cassandra vs ScyllaDB

Compared 13% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs ScyllaDB

Compared 11% of the time

Apache HBase vs ScyllaDB

Compared 8% of the time

Neo4j Graph Database vs ScyllaDB

Compared 4% of the time

More ScyllaDB Competitors

Product Reports

Download Couchbase Enterprise product report

Couchbase Enterprise

November 2026

Download ScyllaDB product report

October 2026

Overview

Couchbase Enterprise delivers low latency with fast real-time read/write capabilities, robust scalability, and dynamic data modeling with JSON. It supports advanced querying, efficient indexing, and seamless integration with Java and .NET, ensuring high availability and minimal downtime with in-memory architecture and XDCR replication.

Designed to enhance performance and streamline data management, Couchbase Enterprise is equipped with a range of features that modern organizations value. Its Sync Gateway and enterprise-grade security offer ease of setup and flexible deployment options, allowing it to significantly reduce operational costs. While it shines in many areas, there are opportunities for enhancing Kubernetes management, concurrency, and user interface design. Organizations might face challenges with onboarding due to the steep learning curve and complex setup, while indexing and functionality on Windows servers can pose issues. Regular upgrades may encounter problems necessitating better documentation and support for real-time processing and cross-version compatibility.

What are the key features of Couchbase Enterprise?

Low Latency: Ensures fast real-time read/write operations.
Dynamic Data Modeling: Utilizes JSON for flexible data representations.
N1QL Query Language: Supports advanced querying capabilities.
Efficient Indexing: Enhances data retrieval speed.
Seamless Integration: Works well with Java and .NET environments.
XDCR Replication: Provides cross-data center replication for high availability.
Sync Gateway: Facilitates synchronization with mobile applications.

What ROI and benefits to expect when evaluating Couchbase Enterprise?

Performance Improvement: Enhances data handling capabilities.
Cost Reduction: Lowers operational expenses.
Streamlined Management: Simplifies data handling processes.
High Availability: Minimizes downtime across systems.

In industries such as gaming, e-commerce, healthcare, and telecommunications, Couchbase Enterprise supports document-based storage and unstructured data handling, enhancing performance in data management. Leveraging JSON document storage and advanced querying, organizations use it for session management, fraud detection, and operational analysis.

Couchbase

ScyllaDB is known for its remarkable speed, efficiency, and reliability. It operates with minimal resources, supports large data volumes, and allows for meticulous fine-tuning. Enhanced by Seastar, it offers a performance edge over Cassandra and prioritizes ease of use with robust data synchronization.

ScyllaDB stands out for its capability in high-volume data handling, making it ideal for distributed systems. It integrates easily with APIs and supports user-defined types, providing flexibility through Cassandra SDK and DynamoDB. High availability, effective partitioning, easy updates, and rapid query responses enhance its appeal for organizations dealing with real-time analytics and time-series data management. However, users have noted the complexity in setup compared to MongoDB or Postgres and have highlighted the need for improvements in areas like data export, deletion processes, and documentation. There are also challenges with transactions, support response, compatibility, and AWS integration, with some requiring custom commands which may affect universality.

What are the key features of ScyllaDB?

Exceptional Speed: Achieves high performance through Seastar technology.
Efficiency: Consumes minimal computing resources while supporting substantial data volumes.
Reliability: Offers robust failover systems and data synchronization capabilities.
Flexible Integration: Supports APIs, user-defined types, Cassandra SDK, and DynamoDB.
High Availability: Ensures continuous access and effective partitioning.

Which benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Maximizes resource utilization with minimal expense.
Performance: Provides fast data querying crucial for real-time analytics.
Scalability: Easily manages large-scale and high-volume data needs.
Security: Ensures safe and secure data storage within distributed systems.

Industries like telecommunications, advertising, mobility services, and security implement ScyllaDB for managing extensive datasets and securing real-time data access. Its scalability and efficiency make it a preferred choice for data transformation services, harmonizing complex data flows with real-time analytics needs.

Sample Customers

Amadeus, Cisco, Comcast, LinkedIn, GE

IBM, Investing.com, mParticle, Comcast, GE, Fanatics, Ola, CERN, adgear, Samsung