Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

Adaptavist and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Adaptavist is ranked #20, while UiPath is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Adaptavist holds a 2.0% mindshare in TMT, compared to UiPath’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Adaptavist users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Adaptavist Test Management ...

Read 5 Adaptavist Test Management for Jira reviews

842 Views
724 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

4,954 Views
743 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Adaptavist Test Management ...

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adaptavist Test Management for Jira and UiPath Test Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Test Management Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. UiPath Test Cloud

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adaptavist Test Management ...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

20th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Test Management Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (7th), Mobile App Testing Tools (4th), API Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is 2.0%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 2.3%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	2.3%
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira	2.0%
Other	95.7%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Ramakanta Sahu

Director of Product at Indian Institute of Management Bangalore

Has dashboard and reporting features that help us identify and address red flags

I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manual processes would be helpful. Second, enhancing the connectivity with third-party tools like Teams or Slack would be valuable. One challenge with integrating Adaptavist Test Management for Jira into workflows is ensuring it accurately tags and incorporates all relevant stories and epics. Sometimes, it’s unclear if the tool considers all dependencies and backlog items, which can affect how risks are assessed. However, it sometimes seems to miss this high-level perspective, which can be a limitation based on how the product is designed. This has been a concern for those who use it regularly, although I don’t manage these aspects personally.

Read full review

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The program is very stable and scalable."

"You can group test cases together and track the execution of them."

"The program is very stable, and that is why we have so much success with it."

"Our software development process primarily uses Adaptive Test Management for Jira to monitor real-time risks across all stories and sprint planning. Additionally, we use it to create action plans for high-priority risks."

"It is a scalable solution."

"Test Management for Jira provides a repository for our test cases."

"We don't use technical support. We have an office in Austria that provides us with solutions. Also, this solution is pretty simple and user-friendly. We don't really need help with it."

"My impression of the stability is very positive."

"UiPath Test Cloud definitely helps free up time for other projects for our engineers."

"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."

"UiPath Test Cloud has helped automate major applications such as SAP and Oracle, which are significant needle movers, particularly in a project we did where a customer was migrating from on-prem to cloud for SAP, allowing us to regression test hyper-fast while rolling out new modules and automating at the same time."

"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."

"Its automated execution when a different package changes and using different test cases defined in an Excel file are particularly useful."

"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"Capability for scalability is basic, it's not as sophisticated as I would like."

"Lacking visual gadgets that go on a dashboard, pie charts, bar charts and histograms."

"They should work on integrating the solution with AI."

"I don't like that you need to use a lot of tabs. One test case takes 15-20 minutes and on Zephyr it takes about 5-10 minutes."

"Something that needs to improve is the model of the licensing. For instance, if you have two packs from two servers, you need to buy two licenses."

"I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manual processes would be helpful. Second, enhancing the connectivity with third-party tools like Teams or Slack would be valuable."

"The product releases sometimes have issues."

"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."

"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."

"The initial setup of UiPath Test Cloud is a mixed bag; while setting up the tool is easy, building the tests is always tedious."

"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."

"With Selenium, there is a plugin called Healenium, which helps automatically detect changed properties of objects. With one click, it automatically updates the object repository with the changed properties. I would like UiPath to add that capability."

"The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely."

"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is rather expensive for those that have many users."

"The tool's pricing is a bit expensive, considering the kind of risk analysis and visibility we want, given that it's built on top of the Jira platform and other Atlassian products. It's priced slightly higher than similar products, maybe five to ten percent more."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"Its price is a bit high."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for UiPath Test Suite?

My use case for this product is specific to a high-profile project within the life sciences domain, where I am involved in the transportation of critical emergency medications that get prescribed a...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText DevPartner vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 15% of the time

PractiTest vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 12% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 10% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 10% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 9% of the time

More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

LEAPWORK vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

QA Wolf vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

August 2026

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira report

Download Adaptavist Test Management for Jira product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

July 2026

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Test Suite

Overview

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira delivers comprehensive test management capabilities with features for step reuse, test case repositories, and risk tracking, enhancing project management through sophisticated metrics and flexible configurations.

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira integrates Microsoft services, offering a repository for test cases and supporting automation tools. Users benefit from risk metrics and flexible configurations for specific project requirements. Enhanced reporting and metrics empower project oversight, providing insights into sprint progress and overarching project goals. The integrated dashboard addresses workflow challenges, facilitating strategic planning. However, areas needing improvement include integration, customization, and intuitive reporting. Users mention the test creation process as time-consuming due to multiple tabs, and licensing could be further streamlined. The disparity between its query functionality and Jira can confuse users, indicating a need for more unified dashboard gadgets and AI-driven test failure analysis.

What are the key features of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?

Step reuse with Microsoft services streamlines repetitive tasks.
A test case repository simplifies test organization.
Automation tool integration enhances testing efficiency.
Risk metrics and count track project risks effectively.
Flexible add-on configurations meet specific project needs.
Comprehensive reporting and metrics offer high-level project views.
Dashboard features tackle challenges and improve workflow.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Streamlined test processes reduce redundancy.
Efficient testing through automation saves time and resources.
Enhanced risk tracking improves project predictability.
Flexible configurations align with team needs.
Data-driven insights support informed decision-making.
Improved strategic planning with proactive dashboard solutions.

In the finance sector, organizations utilize Adaptavist Test Management for Jira primarily for test case writing and execution, often deployed on-premises. The tool aids in contract management and internal business workflows, facilitating department collaboration between teams like marketing and engineering. As an agile lifecycle management plugin, it extends its reach to departments migrating from other management tools, particularly in test management applications.

Adaptavist

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

IBM, John Lewis, Trip Advisor, Netgear, Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Sapient

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. UiPath Test Cloud

August 2026

Free Report: Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.