Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo

Top 10 Barracuda Web Application Firewall Alternatives

Vendor: Barracuda Networks
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Barracuda Web Application Firewall Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Barracuda Web Application Firewall based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, and Azure Front Door. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Barracuda Web Application Firewall surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive threat protection, robust access control, and seamless integration capabilities, ensuring superior security, scalability, and performance for web applications in various environments.

Barracuda Networks Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Barracuda Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall emphasizes comprehensive security and ease of deployment, appealing to users valuing straightforward setup. In comparison, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers advanced capabilities and superior ROI, attracting buyers seeking feature-rich solutions despite a more complex integration and higher initial cost.
Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers a lower setup cost, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher initial investment, underscoring different pricing strategies for securing web applications.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers a lower setup cost, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a higher initial investment, underscoring different pricing strategies for securing web applications.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
3.7 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers robust security and ease of use with competitive pricing, which is appealing for businesses focused on customer support and simple deployment. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway provides advanced features and seamless integration with Azure, suitable for those needing scalable, cloud-native solutions.
Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Report
The Barracuda Web Application Firewall often incurs lower setup costs compared to the Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, which is generally noted for its higher initial investment but may offer extensive integration capabilities with other Azure services.
View comparison
Pricing
The Barracuda Web Application Firewall often incurs lower setup costs compared to the Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, which is generally noted for its higher initial investment but may offer extensive integration capabilities with other Azure services.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Azure Front Door
4.4 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Azure Front Door
4.4 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall prioritizes security with intuitive management and cost-effective solutions, making it ideal for budget-conscious enterprises. In comparison, Azure Front Door emphasizes global reach and speed with advanced features, appealing to organizations needing comprehensive load balancing and seamless cloud integrations.
Download Azure Front Door vs. Barracuda Web Application Firewall Report
Barracuda Web Application Firewall typically involves higher setup costs compared to Azure Front Door, which offers a more competitive pricing structure. This difference highlights the affordability advantage of Azure Front Door against Barracuda's investment-intensive approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Web Application Firewall typically involves higher setup costs compared to Azure Front Door, which offers a more competitive pricing structure. This difference highlights the affordability advantage of Azure Front Door against Barracuda's investment-intensive approach.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.3 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.3 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall emphasizes simplicity and cost-effectiveness, appealing with its user-friendly setup and efficient support. In comparison, F5 Advanced WAF attracts with advanced security features and flexible deployment, suiting enterprises prioritizing detailed controls and sophisticated protection mechanisms.
Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. F5 Advanced WAF Report
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers a moderate setup cost, while F5 Advanced WAF tends to have a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant pricing gap between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers a moderate setup cost, while F5 Advanced WAF tends to have a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant pricing gap between the two solutions.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers robust support and competitive pricing with strong analytics, while AWS WAF provides advanced scalability and integration. In comparison, Barracuda suits cost-effective needs, while AWS WAF attracts those requiring extensive customization within AWS ecosystems despite higher investment.
Download AWS WAF vs. Barracuda Web Application Firewall Report
Barracuda Web Application Firewall involves higher setup costs, whereas AWS WAF provides a more budget-friendly alternative, highlighting affordability as a key difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Web Application Firewall involves higher setup costs, whereas AWS WAF provides a more budget-friendly alternative, highlighting affordability as a key difference.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb
3.9 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb
3.9 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers intuitive management and strong DDoS protection, appealing to organizations with limited IT resources. In comparison, Fortinet FortiWeb provides AI-driven threat analytics and customization, ideal for enterprises needing extensive security measures and willing to invest in advanced features.
Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Fortinet FortiWeb Report
Barracuda Web Application Firewall has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiWeb, which offers more competitive pricing for initial deployment. Users often find Fortinet's pricing better aligned with their budget considerations during the implementation phase.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Web Application Firewall has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiWeb, which offers more competitive pricing for initial deployment. Users often find Fortinet's pricing better aligned with their budget considerations during the implementation phase.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
NetScaler
4.2 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
NetScaler
4.2 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall attracts interest with its competitive pricing and ease of deployment. In comparison, NetScaler's extensive features and advanced traffic management draw those prioritizing a robust security framework. Barracuda's affordability suits budget-conscious buyers, while NetScaler offers compelling depth for complex needs.
Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. NetScaler Report
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while NetScaler involves a higher initial setup investment, highlighting a cost difference in initial deployments.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while NetScaler involves a higher initial setup investment, highlighting a cost difference in initial deployments.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
HAProxy
4.1 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
HAProxy
4.1 out of 5

HAProxy is considered by many in the industry to be one of the fastest and most popular and trusted software load balancer products in the marketplace today. Organizations are able to immediately deploy HAProxy solutions to enable websites and applications to optimize performance, security, and observability. HAProxy solutions are available to scale to any environment.

HAProxy is free software. There are optional paid products (support/appliances).
I think that the pricing is very fair, I would definitely recommend buying the Enterprise license.
View comparison
Pricing
HAProxy is free software. There are optional paid products (support/appliances).
I think that the pricing is very fair, I would definitely recommend buying the Enterprise license.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Imperva Web Application Firewall
4.3 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers affordable pricing and simple deployment, appealing to buyers prioritizing cost-effectiveness and user-friendly support. In comparison, Imperva Web Application Firewall provides advanced threat intelligence and analytics, attracting those seeking extensive protection and willing to invest in a robust feature set.
Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Imperva Web Application Firewall Report
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers a lower setup cost, while Imperva Web Application Firewall is more expensive. These pricing differences may reflect the complexity or features each solution provides.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers a lower setup cost, while Imperva Web Application Firewall is more expensive. These pricing differences may reflect the complexity or features each solution provides.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Imperva DDoS
4.3 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Imperva DDoS
4.3 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall appeals to those seeking affordability and strong support experiences across varied applications. In comparison, Imperva DDoS attracts businesses needing comprehensive DDoS protection, valuing its advanced analytics, even with a higher cost for robust security solutions.
Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Imperva DDoS Report
Barracuda Web Application Firewall involves a straightforward setup cost, while Imperva DDoS requires a more extensive initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Web Application Firewall involves a straightforward setup cost, while Imperva DDoS requires a more extensive initial investment.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Radware Alteon
4.3 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Radware Alteon
4.3 out of 5
Radware Alteon offers extensive application delivery features like SSL-TLS acceleration and integrated security, making it ideal for high-security needs. In comparison, Barracuda Web Application Firewall provides easy setup and strong web protection, appealing to users preferring simplicity and integration capabilities.
Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost but offers advanced features, while Barracuda Web Application Firewall presents a more economical initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost but offers advanced features, while Barracuda Web Application Firewall presents a more economical initial investment.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Kemp LoadMaster
4.7 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Kemp LoadMaster
4.7 out of 5

Kemp LoadMaster is a powerful load balancing solution that also serves as a web application firewall. Its primary use case is load balancing and application load balancing, making it an ideal solution for organizations that must distribute traffic across multiple servers. Kemp's integration with an active directory for ESP usage, hosting/deployment of SSL certificates, and pricing are some of its most valuable features. 

​I have control on the licensing and all the prices since I work for a partner.​
KEMP gives away free trials for 30 days. This can be stretched if you want. During the test, you will have access to KEMP support.​
View comparison
Pricing
​I have control on the licensing and all the prices since I work for a partner.​
KEMP gives away free trials for 30 days. This can be stretched if you want. During the test, you will have access to KEMP support.​
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
NGINX App Protect
4.2 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
NGINX App Protect
4.2 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall excels in pricing satisfaction with rapid deployment and effective cost structures. In comparison, NGINX App Protect offers advanced features and security capabilities, appealing to buyers prioritizing top-tier protection and integration flexibility despite higher costs and a more complex deployment process.
Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. NGINX App Protect Report
The Barracuda Web Application Firewall incurs fixed setup costs, whereas NGINX App Protect involves a variable setup cost model, highlighting differences in initial investment flexibility between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
The Barracuda Web Application Firewall incurs fixed setup costs, whereas NGINX App Protect involves a variable setup cost model, highlighting differences in initial investment flexibility between the two solutions.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Check Point CloudGuard WAF
4.4 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall appeals with its ease of use and affordability, ideal for those seeking straightforward deployment and quick ROI. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF's advanced features and customization options attract organizations needing comprehensive, flexible security solutions.
Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Check Point CloudGuard WAF Report
Barracuda Web Application Firewall is noted for its straightforward setup cost, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF may involve higher initial expenses. Barracuda tends to be more cost-effective initially, in contrast to the potentially more significant upfront costs with CloudGuard.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Web Application Firewall is noted for its straightforward setup cost, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF may involve higher initial expenses. Barracuda tends to be more cost-effective initially, in contrast to the potentially more significant upfront costs with CloudGuard.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Link11
4.4 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Link11
4.4 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall attracts budget-conscious buyers with competitive pricing and strong support. In comparison, Link11 surfaces with advanced DDoS protection and automation. Tech buyers might choose Barracuda for cost-effectiveness, while Link11 appeals for long-term efficiency and superior threat management.
Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Link11 Report
Barracuda Web Application Firewall has a moderate setup cost, while Link11 requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a key pricing difference that may be crucial for budget-conscious buyers.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Web Application Firewall has a moderate setup cost, while Link11 requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a key pricing difference that may be crucial for budget-conscious buyers.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
Barracuda Web Application Firewall Logo
The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences)
3.8 out of 5
Barracuda attracts budget-conscious buyers with its intuitive management and strong threat prevention. In comparison, Fastly appeals to tech-focused environments with deep DevOps integration and dynamic edge protection, offering greater versatility despite higher initial costs, leading to more significant long-term ROI.
Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Report
Barracuda Web Application Firewall has a higher initial setup cost, while The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) offers a more cost-effective setup, reflecting the differing pricing strategies between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Web Application Firewall has a higher initial setup cost, while The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) offers a more cost-effective setup, reflecting the differing pricing strategies between the two solutions.

Related categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Container Security
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)