

Barracuda Web Application Firewall and AWS WAF are competing products in web application protection. AWS WAF is considered superior due to its feature richness and scalability, justifying its higher price.
Features: Barracuda Web Application Firewall provides robust automated security policies, integration with numerous platforms, and a user-friendly environment. AWS WAF offers customizable rules, seamless integration within the AWS ecosystem, and exceptional scalability.
Room for Improvement: Barracuda could enhance its flexibility and provide deeper integrations like AWS. AWS WAF may benefit from simplifying deployment, providing more hands-on support similar to Barracuda, and offering a more predictable pricing model.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Barracuda Web Application Firewall is easy to deploy with expert customer service, making it accessible for users with varying technical skills. AWS WAF offers comprehensive documentation and community support but requires more technical expertise due to its flexible nature.
Pricing and ROI: Barracuda Web Application Firewall features a predictable pricing model with satisfactory ROI, ideal for budget-conscious users. AWS WAF, despite being expensive, provides a flexible pay-as-you-go structure, potentially offering high ROI for those utilizing AWS services extensively.
With AWS WAF, it is easier for us to block unwanted malicious DDoS attacks and threats from coming into our web application.
My development team is working on the latest language tools or applications, so until then, this web application firewall is essential in my network to protect my existing online assets or software.
We have seen a return on investment as the manual work for monitoring attacks and generating reports is reduced significantly, saving money.
Resolving issues can take time because the support personnel may lack product expertise, leading to delays.
They reach out when you send them a ticket, and within 24 hours or less, someone is able to get back to you to solve your problem.
I would rate customer support a solid ten, as they are consistently on top of every issue, addressing them without delays and providing excellent support twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week.
The customer service and support from Barracuda have been excellent.
The customer service and support are exceptional, and I would give them a ten out of ten.
AWS WAF does scale in the sense that it is fully managed and has automatic scaling.
The VMSS feature allows for easy upgrades or scaling of virtual editions.
I believe Barracuda Web Application Firewall is quite scalable, and I would rate it as an eight.
Since it protects web applications from common attacks such as SQL injection and XSS, it is very stable.
In terms of reliability, I would rate AWS WAF about six out of ten due to the need for improved signature sets.
We faced issues with AWS WAF when writing the custom rules.
These result in clients complaining about blocked transactions on a daily basis.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall is stable in my experience.
Compared to firewalls, WAFs generally provide limited stateful analysis capabilities.
The way we see it now is just mentioned as a percentage from bots and actual users, which should include proper graphs and detailed information.
The level of granularity is not great, and as you cross a certain threshold, the cost goes up by twenty or thirty percent every time.
Reducing false positives must be a priority.
The issues with false positives affect client transactions, leading to complaints about blocked transactions.
Tenable provides more comprehensive dark web scanning capabilities, which Barracuda could improve upon.
Due to our status as an AWS shop, AWS WAF is cost-effective for us, and we benefit from discounts due to our extensive use of AWS services.
The licensing cost for AWS WAF is just pay-as-you-go; it is a service-based model.
I requested a quote from Barracuda's UK team, which was half the price I was quoted in Pakistan.
The pricing for Barracuda is quite high compared to other OEMs.
They are competitive when compared to other vendors including F5 and Imperva, who tend to have higher prices.
The biggest benefit of AWS WAF for us is to filter malicious requests, so we can protect our environment and application from malicious actors.
It has also helped to improve the posture of our application, prevent all DDoS attacks, and unnecessary traffic and SQL injection that is reducing the performance of our application.
The specific outcomes showing how AWS WAF has helped our organization include improving our security posture by reducing the attack surface and reducing malicious attacks.
The most valuable features of Barracuda Web Application Firewall include advanced bot protection, DDoS protection, and addressing the top ten vulnerabilities.
This process protects against attacks including SQL injection or cross-site scripting, where Barracuda Web Application Firewall will block any request that matches attack signatures.
The most valuable feature of Barracuda Web Application Firewall is managing bot traffic.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS WAF | 3.9% |
| Barracuda Web Application Firewall | 1.8% |
| Other | 94.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 28 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
AWS WAF provides configurable rules, integration with AWS services, and scalable protection against web threats like SQL injections and DDoS attacks. Its automation and reliable performance are highly valued by users.
AWS WAF is a web application firewall offering significant security features like geo-restriction, custom rules, and IP filtering. Designed for seamless orchestration within AWS environments, it facilitates easy configuration and threat automation. Users benefit from its security policies, enhancing application performance by protecting against threats such as cross-site scripting. Despite its strengths, there is a call for enhanced user interfaces, better documentation, flexible pricing, and improved support. Expanding features like real-time analysis, bot protection, and AI integration can further elevate its utility.
What are the key features of AWS WAF?AWS WAF is extensively used in industries hosting applications on AWS, protecting sensitive data, and monitoring for unauthorized access. Custom and managed rules help cater to infrastructure needs, serving a vital role in maintaining application security across various sectors.
Barracuda Web Application Firewall combines advanced bot management, DDoS protection, and real-time threat detection for enhanced application security, making it a popular choice for safeguarding web environments.
Organizations rely on Barracuda Web Application Firewall for its robust features, including automatic security updates and comprehensive technical support. It offers a user-friendly interface, though improvements are needed in scalability and false positive reduction. It is widely used to enhance security against DDoS attacks, cross-site scripting, SQL injections, and malicious bots. Suitable for Azure environments, it manages legitimate traffic and ensures OWASP compliance across cloud and data centers.
What are the top features of Barracuda Web Application Firewall?Barracuda Web Application Firewall is implemented in industries like cloud and banking for its compliance capabilities and threat protection. It supports web applications through traffic filtering, server protection, and content inspection in hosting environments.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.