No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

What is AWS WAF?

Get the report
Helped 899,204 peers since 2012

Featured AWS WAF reviews

AWS WAF mindshare

As of June 2026, the mindshare of AWS WAF in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category stands at 4.6%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AWS WAF4.6%
Imperva Application Security Platform7.4%
Fortinet FortiWeb5.4%
Other82.6%
Web Application Firewall (WAF)

PeerResearch reports based on AWS WAF reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWeb Application Firewall (WAF)Jun 12, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJun 12, 2026Download
ComparisonAWS WAF vs Imperva Application Security PlatformJun 12, 2026Download
ComparisonAWS WAF vs Fortinet FortiWebJun 12, 2026Download
ComparisonAWS WAF vs F5 Advanced WAFJun 12, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Cloudflare4.3N/A96%79 interviewsAdd to research
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks4.21.9%98%114 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Jun 7, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise22
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business220
Midsize Enterprise98
Large Enterprise432
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Government
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
Construction Company
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Media Company
4%
University
4%
Marketing Services Firm
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Retailer
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Non Profit
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Agriculture
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Religious Institution
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%

Compare AWS WAF with alternative products

Learn more about AWS WAF

AWS WAF customers

Related questions

 
AWS WAF Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Infrastructure Lead at Danat Fz LLC4.0I've used AWS WAF for four years to block unauthorized access, finding custom regex rules valuable, though monitoring and bot detection need improvement; setup is manageable, but DDoS protection requires an additional solution.
DevSecOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5I’ve used AWS WAF for over five years to block malicious traffic and IPs, finding it scalable, stable, and cost-effective, though the dashboard needs improvement. Its automation and managed rules significantly enhance my application’s security and performance.
Senior Cloud Security at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees4.5I use AWS WAF for web application firewalling, valuing its OWASP defense and attack surface reduction. However, I find its sensitivity inconsistent, logs lack specific payloads, and the new dashboard confusing. While the free version helps, tuning and reviewing logs are essential.
Security Engineer Dev Sec Ops at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees2.5I've used AWS WAF for two years. Setup is easy and stability good, but I wouldn't recommend it. Its complex rules, poor granularity, limited customizability, and escalating costs are significant drawbacks.
Security Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0We use AWS WAF on our websites as part of our data protection strategy due to its seamless integration and ease within the AWS platform. Despite improvements needed in signature sets and limited stateful capabilities, it effectively enhances security and saves resources.
AWS DevOps SRE/Infrastructure Engineer at Capgemini4.0I manage infrastructure on AWS using services like KMS, EBS, and WAF version two. AWS WAF's automation in blocking security threats is valuable, though integrating with services like Kafka could be improved. While it can be costly, its security benefits are worth it.
Security Analyst at M2P Fintech3.5I use AWS WAF for its cloud-native functionality, ease of rule management, and better control within AWS infrastructure, though its dashboarding and metric functionalities need improvement. Previously, we switched from Imperva to AWS for cost optimization.
OCI/AWS Consultant at a government with 11-50 employees2.0I use AWS WAF to safeguard sensitive data by filtering HTTP traffic for web applications. While Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offered cost benefits, AWS was chosen for compliance. I appreciate its flexibility but see room for improvement in other AWS services.