IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

AWS WAF vs Cloudflare comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Logo
17,208 views|14,335 comparisons
Cloudflare Logo
20,562 views|18,189 comparisons
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
AWS WAF vs. Cloudflare
May 2020
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS WAF vs. Cloudflare and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
610,229 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"As a basic WAF, it's better than nothing. So if you need something simple out of the box with default features, AWS WAF is good.""The access instruction feature is the most valuable. This is what we use the most.""The most valuable features of AWS WAF are its cloud-native and on-demand.""The solution is stable.""This product supplies options for web security for applications accessing sensitive information.""AWS has flexibility in terms of WAF rules.""Its best feature is that it is on the cloud and does not require local hardware resources.""Stable and scalable web application firewall. Setting it up is straightforward."

More AWS WAF Pros →

"From what I've seen so far, there are no negatives to report as of yet""The DDoS protection is the most valuable aspect of the solution.""New and innovative way to protect the client's data.""It's very user-friendly.""There are key things that are used for our enterprise customers, such as Lambda and DNS."

More Cloudflare Pros →

Cons
"I would like to see it more tightly integrated with other AWS services.""We haven't faced any problems with the solution.""The technical support does not respond to bugs in the coding of the product.""We don't have much control over blocking, because the WAF is managed by AWS.""When users choose the free service, there isn't great support available to them.""Technical support for AWS WAF needs improvement.""While the complexity of the installation can vary from one service to another, overall, I would say that it and the configuration and navigation are somewhat complex.""The serverless product from AWS WAF could be improved. For example, they have only one serverless series, Lambda, but they should extend and improve it. Additionally, the firewall rules are not very easy to configure."

More AWS WAF Cons →

"Technical support is lacking.""There are some issues with the CDN services.""The solution could work at being less expensive. It costs a lot to use it.""Latencies are always a problem.""Although I think it's quite good, it doesn't provide me with all the features I would expect to have if I were using Imperva."

More Cloudflare Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AWS is not that costly by comparison. They are maybe close to $40 per month. I think it was between $29 or $39."
  • "It has a variable pricing scheme."
  • "We are kind of doing a POC comparison to see what works best. Pricing-wise, AWS is one of the most attractive ones. It is fairly cheap, and we like the pricing part. We're trying to see what makes more sense operation-wise, license-wise, and pricing-wise."
  • "It's quite affordable. It's in the middle."
  • "The pricing should be more affordable, especially as it pertains to small clients."
  • "It's cheap."
  • "AWS WAF is pay-as-you-go, I only pay for what I'm using. There is no subscription or any payment upfront, I can terminate use at any time. Which is an advantage."
  • "You need an additional AWS subscription for this product if you are buying a managed tool."
  • More AWS WAF Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We don't have any issues with the price."
  • "The price is reasonable."
  • More Cloudflare Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    610,229 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Hi Varun, I have had experienced with several WAF deployments and deep technical assessments of the following: 1. Imperva WAF 2. F5 WAF 3. Polarisec Cloud WAF Typical limitations on cloud… more »
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit for… more »
    Top Answer:Stable and scalable web application firewall. Setting it up is straightforward.
    Top Answer:The reporting of this solution could be improved.
    Top Answer:Our customers use the web application firewall and Zero Trust predominantly.
    Top Answer:The overall performance of this solution is what make it one of the best solutions on the market. It is important to be able to convince customers that this solution woks well and customers will still… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    17,208
    Comparisons
    14,335
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    551
    Rating
    7.6
    Views
    20,562
    Comparisons
    18,189
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    483
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AWS Web Application Firewall
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources. AWS WAF gives you control over which traffic to allow or block to your web applications by defining customizable web security rules. You can use AWS WAF to create custom rules that block common attack patterns, such as SQL injection or cross-site scripting, and rules that are designed for your specific application. New rules can be deployed within minutes, letting you respond quickly to changing traffic patterns. Also, AWS WAF includes a full-featured API that you can use to automate the creation, deployment, and maintenance of web security rules.

    Cloudflare is the leading performance and security company helping to build a better Internet. Today the company runs one of the world’s largest networks that powers more than 9 million Internet applications. More than 10 trillion Internet requests flow through Cloudflare’s network each month, accounting for nearly 10% of all Internet requests globally.

    Cloudflare protects and accelerates any Internet application online without adding hardware, installing software, or changing a line of code. Internet properties powered by Cloudflare have all web traffic routed through its intelligent global network, which gets smarter with each new site added. As a result, they see significant improvement in performance and a decrease in spam and other attacks.

    Offer
    Learn more about AWS WAF
    Learn more about Cloudflare
    Sample Customers
    eVitamins, 9Splay, Senao International
    Trusted by over 9,000,000 Internet Applications and APIs, including Nasdaq, Zendesk, Crunchbase, Steve Madden, OkCupid, Cisco, Quizlet, Discord and more.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Energy/Utilities Company22%
    Media Company22%
    Transportation Company11%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Media Company9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    REVIEWERS
    Marketing Services Firm14%
    Engineering Company14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Energy/Utilities Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Comms Service Provider23%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business68%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise16%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS WAF vs. Cloudflare
    May 2020
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS WAF vs. Cloudflare and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
    610,229 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS WAF is ranked 4th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 12 reviews while Cloudflare is ranked 3rd in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 6 reviews. AWS WAF is rated 7.6, while Cloudflare is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "Use this product to make it possible to deploy web applications securely". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudflare writes "Robust, secure and innovative; technical support needs to be improved". AWS WAF is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Imperva Web Application Firewall, Azure Web Application Firewall, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall and Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas Cloudflare is most compared with Imperva DDoS, Azure Front Door, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Palo Alto Networks WildFire and Akamai. See our AWS WAF vs. Cloudflare report.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.