AWS WAF vs Uplynk comparison

Read 7 Uplynk reviews

4,499 Views
1,845 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS WAF

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Uplynk and AWS WAF compete in media streaming and web application security, respectively. Customers lean towards AWS WAF for its superior security features.

Features: Uplynk offers adaptive bit-rate streaming, video management capabilities, and seamless video content delivery. AWS WAF provides robust web application protection, customizable security rules, and DDoS protection.

Room for Improvement: Uplynk could enhance its deployment flexibility, offer broader integration capabilities, and improve customer service responsiveness. AWS WAF could work on simplifying its setup process, better handling bot attacks, and expanding third-party integration support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS WAF integrates flexibly within AWS ecosystems, supported by responsive customer service. Uplynk is efficient in video delivery but offers limited deployment flexibility, ensuring effective media streaming support.

Pricing and ROI: Uplynk provides transparent pricing with significant ROI in streaming. AWS WAF, while pricier, justifies costs with enhanced security benefits, targeting those focused on security investments.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS WAF vs. Uplynk Report (Updated: August 2026).

Download the complete report

AWS WAF vs. Uplynk

August 2026

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Uplynk

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

28th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (8th), CDN (8th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of AWS WAF is 4.2%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Uplynk is 1.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS WAF	4.2%
Uplynk	1.3%
Other	94.5%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Azam S M

Infrastructure Lead at Danat Fz LLC

Has successfully filtered malicious traffic and allowed country-specific access controls

For improvement in AWS WAF, we can have better monitoring. One of the things that should be improved in AWS WAF is the monitoring; we need to identify the requests and where they are coming from. If it's a bot, we should differentiate the requests, whether they are automated or not. The way we see it now is just mentioned as a percentage from bots and actual users, which should include proper graphs and detailed information. We also need a feature where we can filter specific requests. If there are scripts in the requests, we should be able to filter those requests to see if there are any scripts running from them.

Read full review

AliKhalil

manager at a non-profit with 501-1,000 employees

Reliable live streaming has increased our continuous viewership and maintained audience trust

Uplynk is deployed in my organization on-premises and is fully on-site. Uplynk supports our business continuity or disaster recovery plans because it's really well protected and it doesn't lag or crash when there's a spike in all areas. Uplynk helps us comply with regulatory requirements in our industry by keeping us live. Uplynk integrates really well with other systems or tools we use. You need a whole team to really run Uplynk because there are so many moving pieces, the code, the app, and other components. My experience with Uplynk's analytics or reporting capabilities is that they are especially helpful to update the teams and our stakeholders. I would describe Uplynk's flexibility or customization options as really easy, really customizable, and it integrates in many areas. Uplynk helps me deliver content to different devices or platforms by allowing us to upload on and stay live on tablets, computers, and televisions. It allows us to stay live to get those viewerships. Uplynk is a software that saves time, but you need a solid team to run Uplynk to ensure viewership and everything is moving because there are many pieces to keep. I advise others looking into using Uplynk that it takes many different areas: coding, integration, APIs, and all that. It takes a team to run it, and you need to be a big company. If you're streaming and doing all that at a big scale, use it. If you're on a smaller scale, Uplynk is going to be really hard for you to manage. It's not something that's simple; just use the ones that are basic out there if you're an influencer and things like that. I would rate this product a nine overall.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The interface is good."

"The solution's initial setup process is easy."

"Their technical support has been quite good."

"As a basic WAF, it's better than having nothing, so if you need something simple out of the box with default features, AWS WAF is good."

"The product's initial setup phase was very simple."

"AWS WAF helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection that happen within the retail industry."

"The stability of AWS WAF is valuable."

"AWS WAF has a lot of integrated features and services. For example, there are security services that can be integrated very well for our customers."

More AWS WAF pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is the Uplynk platform for streaming purposes."

"I recommend this solution because, for me, it's one of the most efficient and performant CDN operators."

"The customer support and service responsiveness were excellent."

"Without EdgeCast, our website was taking 10 to 15 seconds to load; with EdgeCast, it loads under five seconds and it's a good product."

"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."

"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."

"Uplynk has positively impacted our organization by bringing us more viewership, as it does not glitch and stays stable during spikes in viewership, leading to approximately a 15 to 20 percent increase in viewership because there's no lag and nothing fails."

"It's super easy to use and integrate with."

Cons

"The area of reporting in the product needs to have a proper format."

"The solution can improve its price."

"Support wise, I don't think they are that good compared to individual vendors."

"I'd like to see improvements in its usability and functionality. I'm also concerned about being too dependent on the cloud provider's WAF version. For security, using multiple vendors and not putting all our eggs in one basket is better."

"One area that could be improved is the DDoS protection."

"The rate at which AWS updates their managed rule sets could be better. Features like bot protection or DDoS mitigation, available with other WAF vendors, do not come natively with AWS WAF."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"The product could be improved by expanding the weightage units of rules we have when writing policy."

More AWS WAF cons

"The tool needs to resolve its lack of innovation."

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

"The pricing was initially very expensive."

"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."

"To improve Uplynk, it should be made more user-friendly, as it takes a lot of moving pieces to make it work."

"The comparable features that we are looking at fits into Cloudflare's free version, as opposed to Verizon EdgeCast, which we are paying for."

"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS WAF has reasonable pricing."

"The price of AWS WAF is reasonable, it is not expensive and it is not cheap."

"The product’s pricing is reasonable."

"The pricing should be more affordable, especially as it pertains to small clients."

"It's an annual subscription."

"It's quite affordable. It's in the middle."

"We are kind of doing a POC comparison to see what works best. Pricing-wise, AWS is one of the most attractive ones. It is fairly cheap, and we like the pricing part. We're trying to see what makes more sense operation-wise, license-wise, and pricing-wise."

"The product is moderately priced."

More AWS WAF pricing and cost advice

"When I modeled it out, we are spending somewhere between $600 to $800 a month with Verizon EdgeCast."

"The product is cheaper compared to other solutions."

"Be careful about the options because to have all the features can be very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

17%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	28

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What are the limitations of AWS WAF vs alternative WAFs?

Hi Varun, I have had experienced with several WAF deployments and deep technical assessments of the following: 1. Imperva WAF 2. F5 WAF 3. Polarisec Cloud WAF Typical limitations on cloud WAF is t...

How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit ...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS WAF?

AWS WAF is affordable; it depends on the number of rules you apply. The licensing cost for AWS WAF is just pay-as-you-go; it is a service-based model.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Edgio Global CDN?

I wasn't a part of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing discussions, but from what I heard from my colleagues, they said it was really good and it was fair, so they went with that.

What needs improvement with Edgio Global CDN?

To improve Uplynk, it should be made more user-friendly, as it takes a lot of moving pieces to make it work. Uplynk is very complex software with many moving pieces. If you're a big company, Uplynk...

What is your primary use case for Edgio Global CDN?

My main use case for Uplynk is live channels around the clock. Since we're in the television business, we're constantly showcasing shows, and it's a continuous operation.

Imperva Application Security Platform vs AWS WAF

Comparisons

Compared 6% of the time

Akamai App and API Protector vs AWS WAF

Compared 6% of the time

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs AWS WAF

Compared 5% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs AWS WAF

Compared 5% of the time

Azure Web Application Firewall vs AWS WAF

Compared 4% of the time

More AWS WAF Competitors

Akamai vs Uplynk

Compared 10% of the time

Qwilt vs Uplynk

Compared 8% of the time

Windows Azure CDN vs Uplynk

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare vs Uplynk

Compared 6% of the time

Fastly vs Uplynk

Compared 6% of the time

More Uplynk Competitors

Product Reports

Download AWS WAF product report

AWS WAF

August 2026

Download Uplynk product report

July 2026

Also Known As

AWS Web Application Firewall

Edgio, Limelight Content Delivery, Limelight Orchestrate Delivery, Limelight Origin Storage, Global CDN, Verizon EdgeCast

Overview

AWS WAF provides configurable rules, integration with AWS services, and scalable protection against web threats like SQL injections and DDoS attacks. Its automation and reliable performance are highly valued by users.

AWS WAF is a web application firewall offering significant security features like geo-restriction, custom rules, and IP filtering. Designed for seamless orchestration within AWS environments, it facilitates easy configuration and threat automation. Users benefit from its security policies, enhancing application performance by protecting against threats such as cross-site scripting. Despite its strengths, there is a call for enhanced user interfaces, better documentation, flexible pricing, and improved support. Expanding features like real-time analysis, bot protection, and AI integration can further elevate its utility.

What are the key features of AWS WAF?

Configurable Rules: Customize rules to suit specific security needs.
Seamless Integration: Works smoothly with AWS services for comprehensive protection.
Scalability: Handles growing security demands efficiently.
Threat Automation: Automates many threat blocking processes reducing manual intervention.
Geo-Restriction: Restricts traffic based on geographic locations enhancing security.
Custom Rules and IP Filtering: Tailors traffic filtering to organizational requirements.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from AWS WAF?

Robust Security: Protects applications against multiple web threats improving safety.
Easy Configuration: Simplifies the process of establishing security protocols.
Performance Reliability: Users experience consistent and dependable service.
Improved Application Performance: Ensures applications run securely and efficiently without unnecessary disruptions.

AWS WAF is extensively used in industries hosting applications on AWS, protecting sensitive data, and monitoring for unauthorized access. Custom and managed rules help cater to infrastructure needs, serving a vital role in maintaining application security across various sectors.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Uplynk is a robust platform providing CDN integration and optimized streaming services, improving user experience and application performance. It offers control over CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations, supporting seamless asset management and mobile security.

Uplynk enhances application performance through efficient API calls, optimized web server loads, and robust CDN configurations. It ensures high availability and performance by leveraging Verizon EdgeCast CDN, crucial for managing high-volume traffic on e-commerce platforms. Though Uplynk excels in asset caching and mobile security with JWT tokens and AES encryption, some users note its global reach needs improvement, and its interface lacks modern user-friendliness. Deployment of new rules can be slower compared to competitors, while documentation and rate limiting features require enhancement. Despite this, Uplynk remains a preferred choice for organizations seeking streamlined web server load optimization and enhanced application performance.

What are Uplynk's key features?

Rules Engine V4: Manages CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Verizon's existing offerings.
Efficient API Calls: Enhances streaming and application performance.
Staging Support: Testing in staging environments without impacting production.
Mobile Security: Includes JWT tokens and AES encryption.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Load Times: Efficient CDN configurations enhance site speed.
Enhanced User Navigation: Optimized performance for high-volume traffic.
DDoS Protection: Layer 3, 4, and 7 protection for comprehensive security.
Performance Optimization: Mobile development and streamlined caching.

Organizations deploy Uplynk to optimize web server load, enhance streaming service performance and support high-traffic volume management, especially in e-commerce. Its security measures, combined with Verizon EdgeCast CDN, ensure high availability and reliable performance, enhancing mobile engagement through specialized frameworks.

Sample Customers

eVitamins, 9Splay, Senao International

TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach