No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Stonebranch Logo

Stonebranch Reviews

Vendor: Stonebranch
4.4 out of 5

What is Stonebranch?

Featured Stonebranch reviews

Stonebranch mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of Stonebranch in the Workload Automation category stands at 4.8%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workload Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Stonebranch4.8%
Control-M13.8%
AutoSys Workload Automation7.7%
Other73.7%
Workload Automation

PeerResearch reports based on Stonebranch reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWorkload AutomationMar 30, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 30, 2026Download
ComparisonStonebranch vs Control-MMar 30, 2026Download
ComparisonStonebranch vs Automic AutomationMar 30, 2026Download
ComparisonStonebranch vs JAMSMar 30, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Control-M4.413.8%98%193 interviewsAdd to research
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform4.04.8%92%60 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 1, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise20
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business176
Midsize Enterprise78
Large Enterprise466
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Insurance Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Retailer
4%
Government
4%
University
4%
Healthcare Company
3%
Construction Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Educational Organization
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Non Profit
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%

Compare Stonebranch with alternative products

Learn more about Stonebranch

Stonebranch customers

Related questions

 
Stonebranch Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Lead Administrator at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.5I've found Stonebranch effective for job scheduling, especially its versioning, reporting, and cost efficiency. Though its scheduling setup is less intuitive than Control-M, it's stable, scalable, and supporting a successful migration across multiple regions.
Technology Analyst at Infosys4.0I use Stonebranch for SFTP/FTP transfers to mainframe, AS/400, SharePoint, drives, and S3. Its security and automation reduce errors, and support helps, but stability issues, high RAM, and updates can block transfers; I’ve seen no ROI and rate it 8/10.
Operations Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees5.0I've used Stonebranch for over five years mainly for job scheduling; it's stable, scalable, affordable, and simplifies workflow monitoring and troubleshooting, though enhanced search filters and AI features would further improve the experience.
Senior Technical Specialist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees3.5We use Stonebranch as a workload automation solution for SAP jobs, replacing AutoSys. Its GUI and task monitor are valuable, though improvement is needed. We've achieved positive ROI, saving 40-50% compared to previous solutions.
Senior Manager at Colgate3.5I use Stonebranch UAC for automating 35,000 SAP jobs. It's stable with good support, despite a complex migration setup. While the price is moderate and it meets most needs, I find its analytics could be improved.
Senior Manager at Colgate4.0I find Stonebranch performs well with excellent graphical representation and is intuitive, despite requiring technical effort. It's stable and scalable. The initial setup was challenging due to our complex infrastructure. Overall, I rate it 8/10.
Associate Software Engineer at Mphasis4.0In my company, we use Stonebranch for automation on a private cloud with easy rerun and dependency features. While it's cheaper than Control-M, it lacks cloud availability, affecting scalability. Control-M remains more stable and secure.
Application and Database Administrator at Blue Bird Corp4.5Stonebranch has significantly streamlined our workflows, boosting efficiency, visibility, and saving costs by avoiding extra servers. I value its robust stability and user self-sufficiency, though I find its Microsoft SRS integration weak and wider adoption slow.