Redwood RunMyJobs vs Stonebranch comparison

Redwood Software and Stonebranch are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Redwood Software is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.4, while Stonebranch is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. Redwood Software holds a 7.9% mindshare in WA, compared to Stonebranch’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Redwood Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Stonebranch users who would recommend it.

Redwood RunMyJobs

Read 30 Redwood RunMyJobs reviews

2,657 Views
697 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Stonebranch

Read 26 Stonebranch reviews

2,818 Views
960 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Redwood RunMyJobs

Stonebranch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Stonebranch and Redwood RunMyJobs compete in the automation solutions category. Stonebranch appears to have the upper hand with its stable environment and strong platform compatibility, while Redwood excels in event-driven automation and real-time monitoring.

Features: Stonebranch provides a streamlined environment with features like the Universal Agent for integration across a variety of technologies, and it supports a range of systems with versatile platform compatibility. Redwood offers event-driven automation, integrated SLA monitoring, and support for multi-tier environments, which simplifies complex processes.

Room for Improvement: Stonebranch could enhance FTP task capabilities and improve mainframe handling regarding GDG recovery. There is also room for better system integration and user-friendly analytics. Redwood could benefit from a more intuitive interface and improved documentation, alongside better cloud platform compatibility and error handling features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Stonebranch offers a strong on-premises solution with potential growth in cloud capabilities, receiving praise for customer support and technical expertise. Redwood supports various deployment options, including hybrid and public cloud environments, providing flexibility for business needs, though users suggest more engagement from customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Stonebranch is competitively priced, particularly against mainframe competitors, with a positive ROI attributed to reduced manual intervention. Redwood, while having high setup costs for smaller businesses, presents value for extensive automation and pricing balance. Both solutions demonstrate significant ROI by streamlining operations and reducing overhead.

To learn more, read our detailed Redwood RunMyJobs vs. Stonebranch Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Redwood RunMyJobs vs. Stonebranch

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Redwood RunMyJobs

Ranking in Workload Automation

3rd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Stonebranch

Ranking in Workload Automation

14th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of Redwood RunMyJobs is 7.9%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stonebranch is 4.8%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

MaheshKumar6

Senior Analyst at Electronics For Imaging, Inc

Future-proof and powerful with great support

Improvements include: 1) Cost of the Software. Redwood is more expensive than most of the other Automation Software available today; they could make it budget-friendly. 2) It has limited reporting features. Some basic reporting features are missing. 3) There is no option to extract data in Excel. This feature could help in finding errors in the data. 4) Integration with ServiceNow is not supported. 5) The cloud platform compatibility is not up to the mark. 6) Security standards need to be improved. 7) Handling failure is not great; the workflow stops when a job fails and human intervention is required. 8) Configuration and set-up are difficult for someone with less coding knowledge. 9) They need to provide more documentation to assist new users.

Read full review

Siddharth Matalia

Senior Technical Specialist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Good GUI and has helpful support but needs a mobile app

This was a migration project where we provided our database, the previous one, and there was a tool that automatically converted the awarded job into Stonebranch. All the conversion was done from the Stonebranch side, and we got a person as well from Stonebranch during migration. There was a person who worked with us a decade back for the AutoSys install as well. He was well aware of our environment, so he helped us a lot. It was easy. It was not that complex. It is much more GUI. That said, we are looking for how the various automation can be done since, through command lines, you can create a number of jobs. While you are creating a single job, it takes 15 minutes with the GUI, however, if you go for the command line, within two or three minutes, your job gets completed. We have built our own solution for automation using some REST API and all those various integrations. It is working for our organization right now. However, we are requesting some kind of solution from Stonebranch. They should have been providing that to us already. For deployment, three or four people were engaged with the setup on their side. To manage everything, they provided us with a person who required help to manage it. Eventually, since it was a cloud platform on their side, if there is some configuration necessary, which they do it. They get a notification, and they fix it very immediately if there is an issue. The response time is very good from their side, and we don't have to worry about maintenance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its monitoring and alerting features are what I found the most valuable."

"Redwood manages all complex job workflow processes."

"With automation in place, employees can focus on more strategic tasks that require human expertise, increasing overall productivity."

"It can centralize and support on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments seamlessly."

"Redwood helps us to schedule batch jobs on a daily, weekly, and yearly basis to keep the business running smoothly."

"It conjures simplicity from the depths of complexity, effortlessly shouldering burdensome workloads."

"Installing and configuring Redwood agents are easy, and scheduling jobs on Redwood helps in triggering the batches as per business requirements."

"This program works with every browser."

More Redwood RunMyJobs pros

"I can name the aliases on the agent, so if we need a passive environment for an agent, that's one of the nice features. If our primary goes down, I can bring up the passive one and I don't have to change anything in the scheduling world. It will start running from that new server."

"I like the dashboard and the various workflows."

"The features are upgraded, and every six months they're releasing patches."

"The most valuable feature is the reliability of the agents, because we need them accessible and we need to run stuff. The agent technology and compatibility are top-notch."

"We lean a lot on the multi-tenancy that they offer within the product, the ability to get other people to self-manage their estate, versus having a central team do all the scheduling."

"The Universal Agent is the most valuable feature. Being agent-based and being able to go across multiple technology stacks, which is what our workflows do, Stonebranch gives us the ability to bridge those disparate technologies. It enables us to remove the dependency-gap with the agent so we know the status of the workflow at each step."

"We like that it has GUI and is not just a command line."

"When it comes to agent technology and compatibility with other vendors, from a platform perspective it was the one vendor that fit all the platforms that we have, from your old platforms - mainframe, NSK, IBM i - to the new ones, going into cloud and container"

More Stonebranch pros

Cons

"We need the automatic creation of incidents for failed jobs."

"The reports are downloaded in .CAR file format, which makes it difficult to convert to an Excel file."

"Enhancing the user interface would make it more appealing and accessible to a wide range of users."

"They should be made more cost-effective in comparison to similar software services."

"It would be nice if Redwood RunMyJobs could work on different systems."

"The product can improve customer service."

"It has limited reporting features; some basic reporting features are missing."

"Customer support should be enhanced so that we can automatically raise tickets and incidents in customer service."

More Redwood RunMyJobs cons

"It would be ideal if they had the exact same features as the CA Workload Automation DE series. It would be helpful to have calendaring options."

"It's not available on the cloud, so they should take that due to safety, security, and scalability."

"There is room for improvement with its connectivity with the Microsoft SRS system. It is very weak. They keep telling us it works with it, and technically it does, but it does not provide a lot of visibility. We have lost a lot of visibility migrating to Stonebranch, compared with just running tasks on the SRS server. That's really about the only thing that is a sore point for us."

"Stonebranch Universal Automation Center could improve the analytics."

"Occasionally, we have an agent that doesn't come back up after patching. That doesn't happen very often... It's really just a restart of the agent and it comes back up. But that might be one thing that could be improved."

"The Universal Controller is decent for the money it costs... It needs some work to have full features, compared to other products that are out there, specifically IBM's Workload Scheduler."

"There is a component called the OMS, which is the message broker. We rely on infrastructure, resiliency, and availability for that piece. If that could change to be highly available just as a software component, so that we don't have to provide the high-available storage, etc. for it, that would be a plus. It would just be cheaper to run."

"One hiccup we've had is due to the fact that we have other internal scheduling tools. We're able to talk to them, but we have trouble with some of the networking between them, so we're still trying to work out the kinks there."

More Stonebranch cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It initially surprised me because we went from an application that was priced by connection to agents/the number of agents to an application that was priced based on the number of job executions. At that time, many of the products we looked at were also priced on job execution. That seems to be more common in the business or in the vendors that provide solutions out there, but that was probably our biggest difference."

"The price of the solution is at a medium level compared to the competition."

"Stonebranch is cheaper than Control-M, so many companies are using Stonebranch."

"When we reviewed this solution against other vendors, Stonebranch blew everybody out of the water in terms of cost."

"Outside of licensing fees, there aren't any other costs."

"I don't have pricing information, but I do know it's cheaper than our old legacy system. Other than the standard licensing fees there are no additional costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

13%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition?

Even though it is highly-priced, it is a go to SAP product. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What are cloned processes and how do they hinder workload automation?

Dealing with cloned processes can be a real headache for all involved. By using Redwood Software's RunMyJobs, users are able to eliminate the need for cloned job definitions altogether. The platfo...

See all answers

Do you think that a SaaS WLA solution like Redwood can modernize our cloud environment?

From a cost perspective, a modern SaaS like Redwood is advantageous. Unlike some other WLA platforms, this solution offers flexible pricing models and eliminates infrastructure costs. This can sign...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 44% of the time

Control-M vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 22% of the time

Automic Automation vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 8% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 7% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 3% of the time

More Redwood RunMyJobs Competitors

Control-M vs Stonebranch

Compared 31% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Stonebranch

Compared 14% of the time

ESP Workload Automation Intelligence vs Stonebranch

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Stonebranch

Compared 6% of the time

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Stonebranch

Compared 5% of the time

More Stonebranch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Redwood RunMyJobs

May 2025

Download Redwood RunMyJobs product report

Buyer's Guide

Stonebranch

May 2025

Download Stonebranch product report

Also Known As

Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition, Redwood Business Process Automation - Workload Edition, RunMyJobs, Redwood RunMyJobs

Stonebranch Universal Automation Center

Overview

Redwood Software is a prominent player in the enterprise automation space, known for its robust and scalable solutions. It caters to a wide range of industries, offering tools for IT and business process automation. Redwood Software users on PeerSpot often highlights the flexibility and robustness of the solutions. Many users commend the platform for its ability to automate complex and time-consuming processes, which has led to significant time and cost savings. Additionally, the strong customer support and continuous updates are frequently mentioned, indicating a commitment to evolving with customer needs and technological advancements.

Redwood Software offers a holistic suite of automation tools, covering areas such as finance automation, IT process automation, and robotic process automation (RPA). This comprehensive approach ensures that various aspects of business operations can be automated, leading to increased efficiency and reduced manual intervention. Redwood Software is a cloud-native platform, which offers scalability, flexibility, and reduced infrastructure costs.

Redwood Software users shares that its user interfaces is intuitive and this is reducing the learning curve and enabling users across different departments to leverage automation tools effectively. The platform offers sophisticated scheduling and workflow capabilities, allowing for the automation of complex processes.

Redwood Software excels in its ability to integrate seamlessly with a wide range of systems and applications. This integration is key for enterprises that operate in diverse IT environments, ensuring that automation can be implemented across different platforms and applications without compatibility issues. Another important factor for enterprises, is focus on compliance and security, Redwood Software incorporates robust security measures and compliance protocols.

Redwood Software

Stonebranch automates enterprise-level workload and task scheduling across platforms like Linux, Windows, and mainframe, managing thousands of daily tasks for improved efficiency and visibility.

Stonebranch enables organizations to streamline job scheduling by replacing older systems with a robust solution that automates complex workflows, batch processing, and secure file transfers. Its compatibility with multiple platforms and enhanced visibility aid teams in efficiently managing business processes, database interactions, and IT workflows. Equipped with a Universal Controller and Agent, it provides seamless integration across diverse systems, empowering users with greater control over their tasks. While it fosters digital transformation, there are opportunities for enhancements in areas like graphical workflow overviews and API functionality.

What features does Stonebranch offer?

User-friendly interface for intuitive navigation
Robust agents ensuring reliable task execution
Comprehensive workflow automation tools
Platform-agnostic compatibility for diverse systems
Secure file transfer capabilities
High scalability for growing needs
Effective error handling features

What benefits should users expect?

Improved efficiency in task management
Streamlined processes reducing operational complexities
Enhanced visibility and control over workflows
Seamless integration with existing systems
Support for digital transformation initiatives

Organizations in industries such as finance and healthcare implement Stonebranch for its ability to automate complex processes, manage mainframe and distributed environments, and securely transfer sensitive data. Its platform-agnostic nature caters to the demanding needs of these industries, providing a reliable backbone for essential operations.

Stonebranch

Sample Customers

AMD, American Home Shield, Avaya, Burberry, Centrica, City of Dallas, The Container Store, Core & Main, Daikin, Dart Containers, Deere, Energizer, Epson, Halliburton, Keen Foodware, National Gypsum, Rockport Group, Ryder, Technicolor, The University of Michigan, Virgin Money, Whitbread

Nissan, Coop, United Supermarkets, Groupon, CSC, Orbitz, Johnson & Johnson, BMW, Qantas.

Buyer's Guide

Redwood RunMyJobs vs. Stonebranch

June 2025

Free Report: Redwood RunMyJobs vs. Stonebranch

Find out what your peers are saying about Redwood RunMyJobs vs. Stonebranch and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Redwood RunMyJobs vs. Stonebranch report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.