Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Qlik Replicate Logo

Qlik Replicate Reviews

Vendor: Qlik
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Qlik Replicate?

Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support. 

Get the Qlik Replicate Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Replicate, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), Azure Data Factory and more!
Qlik Replicate is the #19 ranked solution in top Data Integration Tools. PeerSpot users give Qlik Replicate an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. Qlik Replicate is most commonly compared to Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC): Qlik Replicate vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC). Qlik Replicate is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 72% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 16% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Qlik Replicate
January 2026
Get the report
Helped 880,745 peers since 2012

Featured Qlik Replicate reviews

Read more reviews

Qlik Replicate mindshare

As of January 2026, the mindshare of Qlik Replicate in the Data Integration category stands at 1.7%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Qlik Replicate1.7%
SSIS4.0%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)3.7%
Other90.6%
Data Integration

PeerResearch reports based on Qlik Replicate reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryData IntegrationJan 22, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJan 22, 2026Download
ComparisonQlik Replicate vs SSISJan 22, 2026Download
ComparisonQlik Replicate vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)Jan 22, 2026Download
ComparisonQlik Replicate vs Azure Data FactoryJan 22, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)4.03.7%92%214 interviewsAdd to research
Azure Data Factory4.03.2%92%93 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Jan 22, 2026

Valuable Features

Qlik Replicate's key features include real-time change data capture, enabling swift data transfer with minimal delay. Users appreciate its ability to handle diverse data tasks, replicate data seamlessly without impacting database performance, and offer user-friendly configuration with drag-and-drop functionality. Its flexibility in managing multiple endpoints and support for advanced data operations, including transforming packed decimal fields, enhances integration processes and supports industrial-scale analytics. Users highlight its robust data mapping and replication accuracy as significant advantages.
  • "Qlik Replicate's real-time data delivery significantly impacts our organization's data insights, especially concerning network outages."
  • "The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature."
  • "The cost is under control with this solution, unlike other services where it's not."

Room for Improvement

Qlik Replicate requires enhancements in user-friendliness, error insight, and support response times. The UI could be more intuitive, logging more accessible, and performance improved. Users express a need for better API integration, flexibility in handling multiple destinations, and detailed pricing clarity. They also seek enhanced features for initial table copies, faster full loads, and clearer driver compatibility. Licensing complexity and marketing strategy should also be revisited for better adoption.
  • "In terms of handling diverse data sources, Qlik Replicate does exhibit certain shortcomings."
  • "Support response times could be improved as there are sometimes delays in receiving replies to support cases."
  • "I am not very comfortable with Qlik support as it often goes in loops. Even priority tickets, which should be resolved in minutes, can take days."

ROI

Users experienced significant ROI from Qlik Replicate. Automation led to savings of 40 to 60 hours monthly by replacing manual reporting with Qlik Sense. Database usage reduced by 30% and data storage by 20% with efficient data capture. Maintenance time and operational costs decreased, enhancing financial reporting reliability. Faster data replication enabled quicker analysis and decision-making. Cost comparisons showed Qlik Replicate as a more economical choice than AWS Kinesis, adding to user satisfaction.

Pricing

Enterprise buyers reported mixed experiences with Qlik Replicate's pricing. Many found it reasonable compared to competitors like GoldenGate, though some noted high costs after considering additional features and core-based licensing models. While advantageous for large companies, smaller businesses may find it costly. Pricing depends on endpoints rather than usage, and setup requires server investment. Annual subscriptions are available, but long-term costs might favor alternatives. Overall, cost perceptions vary widely across different use cases.
  • "Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."
  • "Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."

Popular Use Cases

Qlik Replicate is used for historical and incremental data loads, data pipeline modernization, real-time data migration, and data replication across various platforms. Users transform analytics environments by transferring legacy data to cloud solutions, replicating databases for analytics, consolidating data for easier access, and offering continuous data feeds. It supports integration and automation in analytics by facilitating data replication from databases, file systems, and legacy systems, aiding in data modeling and streamlining ETL processes.

Service and Support

Qlik Replicate's customer service exhibits dissatisfaction among users due to response delays, excessive focus on licensing issues, and difficulty connecting by phone. Support is efficient if tickets are correctly submitted. Users appreciate language-specific services but express frustration with repetitive processes and requests. While some users report satisfactory responses with experienced staff, others choose third-party consultants for support, indicating varied experiences. Despite instances of proactive engagement, there is a consensus on the need for improvement in response time.

Deployment

Users found Qlik Replicate's initial setup generally straightforward, often utilizing support from specialists or implementation partners. While some encountered minor complexities due to their specific environments, configuration of sources and targets was described as easy. Documentation and online resources were valuable, and some deployments were completed within hours, although others required a week due to existing dependencies. Users appreciated the automation in maintenance, particularly in adapting to changes in source systems.

Scalability

Scalability of Qlik Replicate is perceived as strong by users, especially when using it on platforms like Amazon AWS. While some find it requires effort to optimize scalability, others successfully adjust configurations to improve performance. Most users rate scalability positively, highlighting that allocating resources effectively enhances its capacity. Increasing usage and user count resonates well with its ability to accommodate larger organizational demands. Dependencies on support and potential transformation increases are noted, indicating possible expansion.

Stability

Qlik Replicate demonstrates high stability and reliability. Ratings often reach eight or above for stability, indicating minimal bugs or crashes. Many find it handles large data volumes effectively, with rare latency issues. It remains dependable even after interruptions, maintaining up-to-date data. Some observe occasional latency when processing massive data simultaneously, but performance is generally smooth. API concerns are a potential drawback. Overall, organizations rate stability positively.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Qlik Replicate Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business132
Midsize Enterprise73
Large Enterprise524
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Insurance Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Healthcare Company
6%
Retailer
5%
Government
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Consumer Goods Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Transportation Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Media Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Performing Arts
1%
University
1%
Construction Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Non Tech Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%

Compare Qlik Replicate with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Qlik Replicate

Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.

Qlik Replicate was previously known as Replicate, Qlik Replicate.

Qlik Replicate customers

American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare

Related questions

  • 32
When evaluating Data Integration, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 57
Microsoft SSIS vs. Informatica PowerCenter - which solution has better features?
  • 359
What are the best on-prem ETL tools?
  • 191
Which integration solution is best for a company that wants to integrate systems between sales, marketing, and project development operations systems?
  • 140
Experiences with Oracle GoldenGate vs. Oracle Data Integrator?
  • 17
What are the must-have features for a Data integration system?
  • 18
Should we choose Data Hub or GoldenGate?
  • 91
Is there a bulletproof KPI Data Manager for SME?
  • 15
A recent review wrote that PowerCenter has room for improvement. Agree or Disagree?
  • 49
Python with Numpy/Scipy vs. Pure C++ for Big Data Analysis

Product Categories

Product Categories
Data Integration

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Replicate Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Replicate
Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Replicate Logo
Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Replicate
SSIS vs Qlik Replicate Logo
SSIS vs Qlik Replicate
Informatica PowerCenter vs Qlik Replicate Logo
Informatica PowerCenter vs Qlik Replicate
Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Replicate Logo
Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Replicate
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Qlik Replicate Logo
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Qlik Replicate
Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Replicate Logo
Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Replicate
IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs Qlik Replicate Logo
IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs Qlik Replicate
Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate Logo
Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate
Fivetran vs Qlik Replicate Logo
Fivetran vs Qlik Replicate
SAP Data Services vs Qlik Replicate Logo
SAP Data Services vs Qlik Replicate
Denodo vs Qlik Replicate Logo
Denodo vs Qlik Replicate
SnapLogic vs Qlik Replicate Logo
SnapLogic vs Qlik Replicate
Spring Cloud Data Flow vs Qlik Replicate Logo
Spring Cloud Data Flow vs Qlik Replicate
Alteryx Designer vs Qlik Replicate Logo
Alteryx Designer vs Qlik Replicate
See all alternatives
 
Qlik Replicate Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Solution Architect at Predoole Analytics4.5I implemented Qlik Replicate for a bank's cloud data migration using its user-friendly, script-free interface and efficient change data capture. While providing fast data analysis and ROI, it requires improved log monitoring and offers limited transformations with high costs.
Data Governance System Specialist at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5I've found Qlik Replicate effective for real-time data replication, especially during outages, though it could improve on documentation and handling diverse sources; overall, it’s stable, scalable, and enables timely insights critical to our operations.
Director of analytics at Analytics Aura4.0I'm working on a banking project in India using Qlik Replicate, which allows real-time analytics by replicating transactional data to a separate database. It's cost-effective compared to AWS services, although the licensing complexity can limit system capacity utilization.
Presales Manager at Artha Solutions4.0Qlik Replicate efficiently automates data replication, handling 60% of data modeling and ETL processes. It's lightweight and integrates seamlessly but lacks extensive AI features. However, it isn't heavily marketed due to competition from Talend.
Senior Assosiate Consultant at Applied Materials3.5I use Qlik Replicate for real-time data analytics in a global semiconductor environment. Its change data capture capabilities are excellent, but improvements in scheduling and load speeds are needed. Compared to Azure Data Factory, Qlik is more user-friendly.
Senior Architect at SourcEdge4.5I use Qlik Replicate primarily for interfacing with DB2, which excels at mapping and replicating complex data fields and offers efficient change data capture. However, some GUI features are cumbersome, affecting ease of use. It reduces operational costs significantly.
Senior Business Development Manager at Wipfli LLP4.0We use Qlik Replicate for change data capture in production environments. It offers strong data capture capabilities, yielding a 30% reduction in database usage and 20% in storage. However, the pricing could be clearer. We chose it over Fivetran for its capabilities.
Data Analytics Head at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.0I use Qlik Replicate as a CDC plugin, valuing its CDC performance and trigger functions, which are crucial for the financial industry. However, I find the product's licensing limitations need improvement. Currently, I deploy it with other cloud providers.