Qlik Replicate vs Spring Cloud Data Flow comparison

Qlik and Broadcom are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.8. Qlik holds a 1.9% mindshare in DI, compared to Broadcom’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Qlik Replicate

Read 18 Qlik Replicate reviews

3,821 Views
2,751 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Spring Cloud Data Flow

Read 9 Spring Cloud Data Flow reviews

3,005 Views
1,352 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Qlik Replicate

Spring Cloud Data Flow

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Qlik Replicate and Spring Cloud Data Flow compete in the data integration and management sector. Qlik Replicate may have the upper hand due to its real-time change data capture and extensive connector capabilities, while Spring Cloud Data Flow is notable for its programming flexibility and integration with Spring Boot applications.

Features: Qlik Replicate handles diverse data management tasks, offers real-time change data capture, and supports efficient data loading. Its user-friendly interface and extensive connectors further enhance its capabilities. Spring Cloud Data Flow provides flexibility in programming models, strong integration with Spring Boot, and a plug-and-play model with auto-configuration features for microservices orchestration.

Room for Improvement: Qlik Replicate could improve its user-friendliness and error messaging, and issues with its pricing model have been noted. Some users express concerns about the performance of its support. Spring Cloud Data Flow users have identified challenges with documentation clarity and community support. Its interface, particularly for Kubernetes integration, could be more intuitive.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Replicate supports hybrid deployment, allowing flexibility between on-prem and cloud setups, though support experiences vary. Some users praise its thoroughness, while others suggest a need for faster response times. Spring Cloud Data Flow is often deployed on-premises or private cloud, with certain expectations for improvement in community support compared to other tools.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Replicate's pricing, generally seen as high, is more suited for larger enterprises due to its per-endpoint pricing structure. Despite the high cost, users report significant ROI from database usage savings and operational efficiency. Spring Cloud Data Flow, as an open-source product, appeals with a more cost-effective model, incurring only support service costs, making it attractive for those seeking a low-cost entry point. The pricing strategy marks a clear difference, with Qlik Replicate offering premium features at a higher cost versus Spring Cloud Data Flow's cost flexibility with its open-source framework.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Replicate vs. Spring Cloud Data Flow Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate vs. Spring Cloud Data Flow

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Replicate

Ranking in Data Integration

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Spring Cloud Data Flow

Ranking in Data Integration

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Streaming Analytics (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Replicate is 1.9%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spring Cloud Data Flow is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Qlik Replicate	1.9%
Spring Cloud Data Flow	1.1%
Other	97.0%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Shraddha Waghulde

Solution Architect at Predoole Analytics

Real-time data synchronization faces challenges with monitoring and affordability

The user-friendly interface in Qlik Replicate simplifies configuration and management of replication tasks because it is based on GUI, and users don't have to write any scripts. It is entirely drag and drop functionality. Even with zero knowledge of scripting, users can effectively use Qlik Replicate. The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature. As soon as data is entered into the source, it gets captured at target locations. This occurs in near real-time, with replication happening within seconds at the target location. Additionally, whatever operations are performed at the source, whether adding data, deleting data, or updating anything, it gets replicated at target locations. It functions as data injection from source to target, ensuring all operations performed on the source system are replicated on target systems.

Read full review

Lipika Naik

Senior Software Engineer at QBE Regional Insurance

Provides ease of integration with other cloud platforms

Spring Cloud Data Flow is a useful product if I consider how there are different providers with whom my company had to deal, and most of them offer cloud-based products. I can't explain any crucial circumstances where the product's integration capabilities were helpful, but the aforementioned details explain the scenario for which I used the solution. I was only involved with the development of the product and not with the data pipeline configuration phase. The use of Spring Cloud Data Flow greatly impacted projects' time to market since our company's intention was to actually deploy and ensure that the payment platform integrated with it, which was an easy process. The product's user interface was very intuitive. The tool was deployed in multiple environments, but I am not sure about the production. From the time I started taking up the job in my current organization, I saw that we have deployed the tool in multiple environments wherein the number of users extensively used the product in the UAT environment, which is one of the most stable environments. There were 20 different methods to test the tool. I wouldn't be able to tell you the production details of the tool as I was more part of the production deployment, but I can say that it was deployed with the intent of making it available for 10,000 users. Those who plan to use the product should enjoy the flexibility of the solution. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Qlik Replicate stands out with its cutting-edge technology and its ability to handle diverse data management tasks. This powerful tool allows us to efficiently and swiftly load data into various data stores or destinations, while also enabling easy distribution across different endpoints. A notable feature is its capability to reload data from multiple sources by creating multiple tasks within a brief timeframe of fifteen to twenty minutes. This eliminates the need for manual intervention and ensures quick data loading from different tables."

"Qlik Replicate's ability to correctly map and replicate data, especially when converting complex fields like packed decimal fields into integers, stands out."

"A pretty good series of connectors is one of the best features of Qlik Replicate."

"A valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is that you do not need ETL. It's easy to use—you choose two systems and it automatically replicates them. Even if there is no CDC available, if you insert it and update it, and there is nothing to find out, then you can use Qlik Replicate. It's a good product."

"Great with replicating and updating records."

"It enables us to transform data at the latest stage rather than in ETL loads, so it's more ELT which is one of the advantages. It is also in near real-time, which brings significant advantage for our embedded analytics approach."

"The most useful functions of Qlik Replicate are the data manipulation to transformations."

"The CDC and the flexibility to use QVD as a source are the most valuable features of Qlik Replicate."

More Qlik Replicate pros

"The most valuable feature is real-time streaming."

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it allows us to use different batch data sources, retrieve the data, and then do the data processing, after which we can convert and store it in the target."

"There are a lot of options in Spring Cloud. It's flexible in terms of how we can use it. It's a full infrastructure."

"The most valuable features of Spring Cloud Data Flow are the simple programming model, integration, dependency Injection, and ability to do any injection. Additionally, auto-configuration is another important feature because we don't have to configure the database and or set up the boilerplate in the database in every project. The composability is good, we can create small workloads and compose them in any way we like."

"The best thing I like about Spring Cloud Data Flow is its plug-and-play model."

"The ease of deployment on Kubernetes, the seamless integration for orchestration of various pipelines, and the visual dashboard that simplifies operations even for non-specialists such as quality analysts."

"The dashboards in Spring Cloud Dataflow are quite valuable."

"The product is very user-friendly."

Cons

"When you remote into it the Qlik Replicate UI a lot of times it just freezes. We set up the EC2, to allow them to go to the server and click on the Replicate icon, it just opens up and just sits there. At that point, we have to go into the EC2 and then reboot the server. This should be fixed, it is frustrating."

"In the next release, I would like to see closer integration with data catalyst."

"We'd like better connectivity."

"The UI and data version control can be improved."

"The disadvantage is people are not going for this license because it is not marketed properly."

"In various scenarios, an important consideration is when we encounter issues and Qlik Replicate suggests reloading a specific table. If we face any problems or encounter errors with that table, it becomes necessary to make a change in Qlik Replicate. Performing a full reload every time is not feasible or practical. Instead, we should identify the specific issues and address them without repeating the entire reloading process. Based on this approach, we can investigate and resolve the problem by performing targeted loads from the source itself. This change aligns with my perspective and is something I would like to implement."

"Support-wise, this solution is in need of improvement."

"The product should improve its licensing limitation."

More Qlik Replicate cons

"Spring Cloud Data Flow could improve the user interface. We can drag and drop in the application for the configuration and settings, and deploy it right from the UI, without having to run a CI/CD pipeline. However, that does not work with Kubernetes, it only works when we are working with jars as the Spring Cloud Data Flow applications."

"There were instances of deployment pipelines getting stuck, and the dashboard not always accurately showing the application status, requiring manual intervention such as rerunning applications or refreshing the dashboard."

"I would improve the dashboard features as they are not very user-friendly."

"Spring Cloud Data Flow is not an easy-to-use tool, so improvements are required."

"Some of the features, like the monitoring tools, are not very mature and are still evolving."

"The configurations could be better. Some configurations are a little bit time-consuming in terms of trying to understand using the Spring Cloud documentation."

"The solution's community support could be improved."

"On the tool's online discussion forums, you may get stuck with an issue, making it an area where improvements are required."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."

"Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."

"Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."

"The solution provides value for money, and we are currently using its community edition."

"If you want support from Spring Cloud Data Flow there is a fee. The Spring Framework is open-source and this is a free solution."

"This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Insurance Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Qlik Replicate?

The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data appli...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?

Qlik Replicate could be improved in the next release by incorporating more monitoring options to monitor the logs. Currently, log monitoring is not easily accessible, so there should be improvement...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?

My customer's main use case for Qlik Replicate is with one of the payment banks in India. We have implemented this Replicate project for their source data migration to cloud solutions. They wanted ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spring Cloud Data Flow?

There were instances of deployment pipelines getting stuck, and the dashboard not always accurately showing the application status, requiring manual intervention such as rerunning applications or r...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spring Cloud Data Flow?

We had a project for content management, which involved multiple applications each handling content ingestion, transformation, enrichment, and storage for different customers independently. We want...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Spring Cloud Data Flow?

I would definitely recommend Spring Cloud Data Flow. It requires minimal additional effort or time to understand how it works, and even non-specialists can use it effectively with its friendly docu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 15% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 15% of the time

Qlik Compose vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 7% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 6% of the time

Fivetran vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 6% of the time

More Qlik Replicate Competitors

Apache Flink vs Spring Cloud Data Flow

Compared 30% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs Spring Cloud Data Flow

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Spring Cloud Data Flow

Compared 5% of the time

Apache Spark Streaming vs Spring Cloud Data Flow

Compared 5% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Spring Cloud Data Flow

Compared 5% of the time

More Spring Cloud Data Flow Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate

December 2025

Download Qlik Replicate product report

Buyer's Guide

Spring Cloud Data Flow

December 2025

Download Spring Cloud Data Flow product report

Also Known As

Replicate, Qlik Replicate

No data available

Overview

Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support.

Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.

Qlik

Spring Cloud Data Flow is a toolkit for building data integration and real-time data processing pipelines.
Pipelines consist of Spring Boot apps, built using the Spring Cloud Stream or Spring Cloud Task microservice frameworks. This makes Spring Cloud Data Flow suitable for a range of data processing use cases, from import/export to event streaming and predictive analytics. Use Spring Cloud Data Flow to connect your Enterprise to the Internet of Anything—mobile devices, sensors, wearables, automobiles, and more.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate vs. Spring Cloud Data Flow

December 2025

Free Report: Qlik Replicate vs. Spring Cloud Data Flow

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Replicate vs. Spring Cloud Data Flow and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Replicate vs. Spring Cloud Data Flow report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.