OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 3.1% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 12.0% |
| BrowserStack | 6.8% |
| Other | 78.1% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Functional Testing Tools | Mar 27, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Mar 27, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Tricentis Tosca | Mar 27, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs BrowserStack | Mar 27, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Worksoft Certify | Mar 27, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tricentis Tosca | 4.1 | 12.0% | 96% | 113 interviewsAdd to research |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 4.0 | 6.2% | 87% | 98 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 25 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 93 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 44 |
| Large Enterprise | 181 |
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers was previously known as Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT.
Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| SQA Manager at Elmo Motion Control Ltd. | 4.0 | We use OpenText UFT Developer for software and regression testing, mainly for GUI and web applications. It's user-friendly with good Visual Studio integration and excellent support, though object recognition could improve. It saves us 80% compared to manual testing. |
| Performance Lead Manager at Wipro Limited | 4.5 | I create workload models for performance testing, emphasizing stress, endurance, and spike scenarios. OpenText UFT Developer excels in supporting various protocols, but it can't match the speed of newer tools like NeoLoad for script creation and execution. |
| Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I've used OpenText Functional Testing for Developers for three years; it's great for cross-browser and AI-driven automation, though it's resource-heavy. Setup is easy, support is responsive, and it outperforms TestComplete in functionality for our needs. |
| Process Architect Referent at Forvia | 3.0 | I use OpenText UFT Developer for ERP system functionality and appreciate its effective record technology. However, it could improve in handling desktop apps and websites, and its design and functionality need enhancements. I considered Tricentis Tosca before choosing this solution. |
| SQA Manager at Elmo Motion Control Ltd. | 4.0 | We use OpenText UFT Developer for functional testing of desktop and web applications. Its integration capabilities are valuable, but .NET and Visual Studio support need improvement. Despite being pricey, we've seen a 70% ROI compared to manual testing. |
| AVP - Testing & QA at Laminaar Aviation | 4.0 | I've used OpenText UFT Developer for web and SAP automation across platforms, finding it intuitive with easy scripting and strong resource availability. However, object recognition, particularly with calendar controls, needs improvement. My experience includes various tools, eventually integrating into UFT. |
| Systems Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | No summary available |
| Framework Architect and Test Automation Specialist at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.0 | I value UFT for simple record and play testing, noting its ease for developers and low footprint. While stable, customer service is slow, and the single instance per machine is a key limitation I face. |
