Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Worksoft Certify comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
OpenText Functional Testing cuts automation costs by 50%, enhances ROI, and saves 70-80% through increased shared usage.
Sentiment score
7.6
Organizations achieve 583% ROI in five years by using Worksoft Certify for faster, cost-effective automated testing processes.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.7
Reports are mixed, with some praising responsiveness and others criticizing slow responses and difficulties reaching higher-level support.
Sentiment score
6.6
Worksoft Certify's support is knowledgeable and proactive, but users experience delays and seek improved initial response times.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
Their technical support is responsive, which is good, and their solutions are timely.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
OpenText Functional Testing is scalable and flexible, supporting multiple languages and platforms, with some concerns about licensing costs.
Sentiment score
7.7
Worksoft Certify effectively manages scalability, supporting diverse platforms and seamless growth, despite some reported performance challenges.
We are an enterprise company. It covers companies of all sizes.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
OpenText Functional Testing has mixed stability reviews, with issues in integration and performance, yet shows improvement over time.
Sentiment score
7.2
Worksoft Certify is highly stable, with minor, manageable bugs and effective support, often attributed to external factors rather than design flaws.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for stability.
 

Room For Improvement

OpenText Functional Testing needs IoT support, better stability, multi-platform compatibility, enhanced usability, and improved pricing and technology integration.
Worksoft Certify needs improvements in performance, UI clarity, integration, support, mobile, automation, and training resources for diverse environments.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
There are still some minor issues concerning continuous testing, particularly related to the timeout feature.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users find OpenText Functional Testing expensive despite integration benefits, with high standard licensing fees and setup costs.
Worksoft Certify's pricing depends on needs, offering cost-effective discounts and value despite initial setup and supplementary tool costs.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
 

Valuable Features

OpenText Functional Testing offers versatile, user-friendly multi-platform automation with ALM integration, supporting C#, Java, APIs, and DevOps practices.
Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation, SAP integration, and user-friendly test scripts, enhancing efficiency and simplifying complex application testing.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
We're getting good value from continuous testing management, and the fact that it's also codeless is valuable.
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
12th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
11th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Worksoft Certify
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
10th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
API Testing Tools (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is 2.3%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 4.2%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Eitan Gold - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly integration with support for Visual Studio enhances GUI testing capabilities
OpenText UFT Developer ( /products/opentext-uft-developer-reviews ) is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio. The support is excellent. It is easy to implement tests with OpenText UFT Developer. We primarily use it for GUI testing and testing web applications with another application. This is the main usage for us. We also integrate it with the N-unit Framework ( /products/framework-reviews ), and they work well together.
Shailesh-Parkhe - PeerSpot reviewer
Powerful automation tool with a user-friendly interface, codeless automation, and adaptability to complex business processes, particularly in SAP environments
The tool itself is highly effective, especially when it comes to comprehensibility for newcomers. Even during the initial learning phase, I found it remarkably user-friendly. It facilitates quick onboarding and training of new resources. It offers features for building automation scripts, such as search and certify capture. A notable advantage is that it doesn't rely on other tools like Micro Focus UFT or Micro Focus ALM for script execution. Worksoft can run independently without the need for support from Microsoft Office, although the option to use it for maintaining data exists. The tool also includes debugging features and comprehensive reporting capabilities, generating PDF reports for easy analysis.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
5%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Retailer
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Developer?
There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus UFT Developer?
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Developer?
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary. This limits the technology's ability to recognize every object.
How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?
Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...
What do you like most about Worksoft Certify?
A specific feature that I found to be the most valuable in the solution for our company's work processes stems from the fact that it is useful as a low-code automation tool.
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines
Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.