BlazeMeter and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers compete in the field of performance and functional testing tools. BlazeMeter has an edge due to its versatile cloud capabilities and scalability for load testing.
Features: BlazeMeter offers comprehensive load testing and performance analysis features, easily scalable cloud-based solutions, and integration with tools like New Relic and JMeter. It's favored for large-scale simulations and detailed reports. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers supports functional testing with developer-centric tools, integrating seamlessly into development workflows with environments like C# and Java.
Room for Improvement: BlazeMeter could enhance granular access control, real-time test starting, and improve load generator provisioning efficiency. Users also desire better APM tool integration, enhanced customization, and improved documentation. OpenText is critiqued for a high pricing structure and complexity in supporting multiple environments and scripting languages. Users seek improvements in stability, flexibility, and better integration with modern tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter is easier to deploy with its cloud-centric approach, offering extensive support, including real-time assistance, leading to high user satisfaction. OpenText heavily relies on on-premises deployments, posing flexibility and speed challenges, but offers adequate technical support.
Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter provides flexible pricing models tailored to business needs with options like custom contracts, while being justified by its robust testing features. OpenText has higher licensing costs, potentially prohibitive for smaller companies. Both tools offer positive ROI, with BlazeMeter noted for reducing infrastructure costs and increasing software quality through efficient performance testing.
The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
BlazeMeter has the capability to simulate a higher number of users compared to JMeter standalone.
BlazeMeter is quite scalable, and I rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
I would rate the stability of BlazeMeter as eight out of ten, indicating that it is a stable and reliable solution.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
The extra CSV random dataset plugin could be integrated with a simple checkbox in the existing CSV dataset plugin to read files randomly.
The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
BlazeMeter requires licensing, which means it is not free like JMeter, adding to the setup cost considerations.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
BlazeMeter integrates with JMeter via multiple plugins, which streamlines performance testing, test monitoring, and report sharing.
BlazeMeter offers a higher limit on load simulation compared to standalone JMeter.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
