BlazeMeter and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers both compete in the software testing space. BlazeMeter holds an advantage due to its flexibility, cloud-based nature, and capacity to scale tests globally.
Features: BlazeMeter offers cloud-based load generation, multi-location test execution, and seamless integration with tools like New Relic. It also allows for easy scaling of JMeter tests. OpenText supports extensive test coverage, integration into existing development environments, and has features for AI-driven test automation.
Room for Improvement: BlazeMeter needs to enhance load generator provisioning, customize reports better, and improve its documentation. OpenText requires enhancements in stability, browser support, and user interface customization.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter's SaaS model simplifies deployment and scaling of tests, with generally responsive technical support. OpenText's on-premises deployments can be complex, requiring technical expertise, but user feedback on support is positive.
Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter offers competitive consumption-based pricing, reducing infrastructure costs and enhancing productivity. OpenText is considered high-priced, mainly used by larger enterprises for its comprehensive functionality, posing challenges for smaller businesses seeking budget flexibility.
The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
BlazeMeter has the capability to simulate a higher number of users compared to JMeter standalone.
BlazeMeter is quite scalable, and I rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
I would rate the stability of BlazeMeter as eight out of ten, indicating that it is a stable and reliable solution.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
The extra CSV random dataset plugin could be integrated with a simple checkbox in the existing CSV dataset plugin to read files randomly.
The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
BlazeMeter requires licensing, which means it is not free like JMeter, adding to the setup cost considerations.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
BlazeMeter integrates with JMeter via multiple plugins, which streamlines performance testing, test monitoring, and report sharing.
BlazeMeter offers a higher limit on load simulation compared to standalone JMeter.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| BlazeMeter | 0.6% |
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 2.9% |
| Other | 96.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
