Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Diagnostics Logo

OpenText Diagnostics Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
3.9 out of 5

What is OpenText Diagnostics?

Featured OpenText Diagnostics reviews

OpenText Diagnostics mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of OpenText Diagnostics in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category stands at 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Diagnostics0.6%
Dynatrace6.0%
Datadog5.2%
Other88.2%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Performing Arts
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Construction Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Wellness & Fitness Company
5%
Marketing Services Firm
5%
Transportation Company
5%
University
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Logistics Company
4%
Hospitality Company
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Computer Software Company
4%
Retailer
4%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Media Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Photography Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Renewables & Environment Company
2%
 
OpenText Diagnostics Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Performance and Fault-tolerance Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees5.0I found HP Diagnostics excellent for deep, transaction-level monitoring, quickly identifying root causes in AWS SAP/Java. While providing great tracing and visibility, licensing is expensive and HP support for diagnostics is poor.
Presales Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees4.0I use Micro Focus Diagnostics for deep application review, highly valuing its detailed root cause analysis for timeouts. While it's stable and scalable, I find the GUI and metric details need improvement to enhance its overall effectiveness.
DXC Technology at a tech services company with 51-200 employees3.5I found Micro Focus useful and stable on-premises for banking/telecom, but the interface needs improvement. My main concern is its future cloud integration and monitoring, though premium support is good. I rate it 7/10.
Consultant at basistek3.0I use this solution for clients to view data. While setup is easy, and diagnostics are valuable, its old, unfriendly UI and lack of .NET Core support are significant drawbacks, leading to my 6/10 rating.