Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

What is OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)?

OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.

Get the OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud), Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad and more!
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is the #5 ranked solution in top Performance Testing Tools and #6 ranked solution in top Load Testing Tools. PeerSpot users give OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is most commonly compared to Apache JMeter: OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Apache JMeter. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 59% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 13% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
December 2025
Get the report
Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Featured OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) reviews

Read more reviews

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) mindshare

Product category:
Performance Testing Tools
As of December 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) in the Performance Testing Tools category stands at 9.3%, up from 8.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Performance Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)9.3%
Apache JMeter13.6%
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)12.8%
Other64.3%
Performance Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryPerformance Testing ToolsDec 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Apache JMeterDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Tricentis NeoLoadDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs BlazeMeterDec 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Apache JMeter3.913.6%88%96 interviewsAdd to research
Tricentis NeoLoad4.110.7%95%66 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is recognized for fast and intuitive testing cycles, allowing up to 1 million concurrent users with ease. It's flexible, integrates seamlessly with SiteScope and APM tools, and supports diverse protocols like TruClient and JMeter. Users appreciate its scalability, cloud-based infrastructure eliminating hardware needs, real-time anomaly detection, and in-depth analysis capabilities. The tool's ability to handle extensive testing scenarios is highly valuable.
  • "The most useful features of OpenText LoadRunner Cloud include getting load through the Performance Center, which is part of the cloud version, where we can monitor CPU and memory utilization, and response times."
  • "OpenText LoadRunner Cloud can scale in a cloud-based environment to support up to ten thousand concurrent users without capacity loss, which is not possible with on-premise solutions on personal machines."
  • "I rate OpenText LoadRunner Cloud ten out of ten."

Room for Improvement

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) requires enhancements in custom reporting, monitoring, and load distribution. Users find challenges in integrating with other tools, updating run-time settings, and experiencing delays during test initiation. There are issues with backward compatibility, creating custom load patterns, and simulating network latencies. Many seek improved documentation and technical support, better CI/CD pipeline integration, and more intuitive interfaces, especially for non-technical users. The need for performance improvements and localized server monitoring also persists.
  • "I faced issues with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud support when a problem took three to four months to resolve, which negatively impacted our project, especially when key team members were unavailable during leave periods."
  • "I have faced several problems using the cloud in different locations, so I rate the stability a six out of ten."
  • "The analysis feature in OpenText LoadRunner Cloud requires improvement. In-depth analysis tools found in the standalone LoadRunner analysis, such as graph merging and setting granularity, would be beneficial."

ROI

Organizations report positive ROI using OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud), citing significant savings on infrastructure and licensing costs. Performance priorities became clearer, enhancing development decisions. Savings include reduced expenditure on load generators and Windows Server licenses, while costs for cloud testing decreased. Users benefit from TruClient for performance testing without programming skills, cutting annual costs. Testing ensures customer-facing applications handle the load, reducing performance degradation and improving user experience. Third-party readiness is essential for expected load specifications.

Pricing

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers reasonable initial setup costs due to its SaaS model, with pricing dependent on virtual-user hours and usage. While some find it competitive, others note it as expensive compared to alternatives like NeoLoad. The pay-as-you-go and subscription models provide flexibility and cost-effectiveness during low activity periods. Licensing is straightforward, but pricing can be higher due to broad protocol support. Discounts and AWS Marketplace offers enhance affordability, yet some users consider it pricey.
  • "It's a very expensive solution"
  • "The pricing for OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is average."
  • "It is neither costly nor cheap. It is not too high and not too low. I know the price of other tools, and LoadRunner Cloud's price is in the medium range."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations utilize OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) primarily for load testing and performance validation. They simulate scenarios with multiple users accessing systems simultaneously, assess enterprise systems' capacity, and benchmark performance based on various KPIs. The tool facilitates deployment for public use, integrates with CI/CD pipelines, and conducts web, mobile, and API testing. Its cloud-hosted nature and hybrid setup ensure scalability and geographical distribution, making it ideal for sectors like banking, retail, and enterprise applications.

Service and Support

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) offers varying levels of customer service and technical support. Some find their support team responsive and effective, with good communication and proactive assistance. Others report delays in response times and a lack of expertise in certain areas. The transition from Micro Focus to OpenText has been noted, with some improvement needed. Users appreciate assistance with queries and technical issues, but some experience challenges with resolving more complex problems.

Deployment

Users find OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) setup mostly straightforward and user-friendly, especially in comparison to on-premises versions. Registration and documentation aid efficiency, though some experience conflicts with older installations. Certain challenges arise with cloud-based configurations, such as dynamic IP ranges and firewall access issues. Although generally easy, specific cases note complexity, especially during migrations or when deeper technical documentation is needed. Integration with AWS is praised for ease.

Scalability

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is noted for its impressive scalability, with the capability to handle large volumes and add or remove users easily. Users appreciate its adaptability for various needs and environments, allowing tests with high numbers simultaneously. While some mention cost concerns, scalability seems efficient. Scalability issues, when encountered, are resolved effectively, and many rate it highly, finding it suitable for their diverse testing needs.

Stability

Users find OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) stable, reporting minimal issues. High concurrency tests initially caused graph and test initialization problems but were swiftly addressed. Some mention bugs resolved by support teams and observe improvement needs for features. Stability receives ratings from six to nine out of ten. Competitors like NeoLoad and JMeter are found less stable. Users highlight reliability during extensive use, though a few note minor stability challenges needing attention.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise27
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business112
Midsize Enterprise47
Large Enterprise230
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
Government
5%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Performing Arts
4%
University
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Retailer
4%
Transportation Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Sports Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Construction Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Security Firm
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Museum Or Institution
1%
Non Tech Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%

Compare OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.

What are the key features?
  • Rapid Test Setup: Quickly initiate performance tests without extensive configuration efforts.
  • Scalability: Supports numerous users without loss of performance across global regions.
  • Global Load Distribution: Allows effective load distribution across different geographies.
  • Seamless Tool Integration: Integrates smoothly with SiteScope, New Relic, and others.
  • Real-time Anomaly Detection: Instantly identifies performance anomalies for immediate action.
What benefits should users consider in reviews?
  • Minimal Infrastructure Management: Reduces the need for physical resources, saving costs and effort.
  • Enhanced Application Responsiveness: Ensures applications remain stable under peak loads.
  • Increased Testing Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes for faster execution.
  • Cloud-Based Flexibility: Offers dynamic resource allocation to accommodate varying test needs.
  • Comprehensive Performance Insights: Delivers valuable analytics for optimizing applications.

Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) was previously known as Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) customers

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Related questions

  • 35
How does HPE StormRunner compare to tools from other providers?
  • 6
Can you use HPE StormRunner Load as a service and what are the payment options?
  • 14
Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?
  • 14
When evaluating Load Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 24
SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?
  • 14
Does Compuware have a manual testing solution? Which manual testing solutions should we be considering?
  • 31
What are the top performance tools available to load test web applications?
  • 25
What is the best tool for mobile native performance testing on real devices?
  • 16
When evaluating Performance Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 91
Cost of TOSCA Testsuite?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Performance Testing Tools
Load Testing Tools

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
BlazeMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
BlazeMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
Perfecto vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
Perfecto vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
k6 Open Source vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
k6 Open Source vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
IBM Rational Test Workbench vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
IBM Engineering Test Management vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
IBM Engineering Test Management vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
Eggplant Performance vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
Eggplant Performance vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
RadView WebLOAD vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
SmartBear LoadNinja vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Logo
SmartBear LoadNinja vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
See all alternatives
 
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Performance Test Analyst at Sensata Technologies3.5I use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud for performance testing but face script issues and slow support resolutions, especially during critical times. While NeoLoad is an option, script maintenance challenges and license costs keep us with LoadRunner.
CTO at Marco Technology3.5I use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud for cloud-based application projects, as its scalability supports up to ten thousand users efficiently. While its flexibility enhances high-scale testing, improvements in regional testing accuracy and AI-driven strategies are needed for better results.
Partner at IS Nordic AS3.0We use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud to ensure performance through load testing. Its valuable functionality allows recording and replaying networking protocols, handling extensive tasks like 350,000 web service calls per hour. I find it effective, with no notable improvements needed.
Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy5.0I primarily use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud for performance testing scripts and workflows. While its analysis depth could improve, using JMX files is beneficial. Previously, I used NeoLoad but now rely solely on LoadRunner Cloud with Microsoft Azure.
Senior Manager, Performance Engineering at Enel Group3.5We use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud for online and mobile banking services. It excels in performance testing by creating realistic scenarios and handling large user volumes. While it delivers a good ROI, improvements in the user interface and technology adoption are needed.
Cloud Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees4.0We use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud for load testing, benefiting from its flexibility with load generators and browser compatibility. It's improved over time, though native integration with Chaos engineering tools could enhance functionality. We previously used Performance Center but switched for better access.
VP at Deloitte4.5We use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud for performance testing, having transitioned from LoadRunner Professional for its scalable, geographically distributed resources. While beneficial, its scriptless automation needs improvement for our less technical manual QA testers who desire more intuitive features.
Senior Quality & Test Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5I use Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud for performance modeling and validation. It's flexible, supporting various programming languages. However, the outdated runtime viewer and limited reporting control need improvement to better accommodate new web technologies. Overall, it's still effective.