What I found most useful in ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is its integration with other ManageEngine applications. It seamlessly integrates throughout the ManageEngine suite, and that's beneficial. I also like that the solution has chain management capabilities, it has a modular approach, and it's easy to reach the support team.
What I'd like to see as an improvement to ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is for it to be more AI-driven. Having more automation would also make the solution better.
I've been using ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer for around six years.
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is a very stable solution.
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is a scalable solution.
Our experience with the technical support for ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer was very good. They understood our problems and gave us solutions. It took some time for them to solve problems, but they were there to provide solutions to our issues.
I would rate ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer support as five out of five.
The initial setup for ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer wasn't that complicated, but because of the complexity of the ecosystem, it takes time. If I were to rate the setup process for the solution, I'd give it four out of five, so not the best.
Licensing for ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is paid yearly, but I'm with the technical department, not the procurement department, so I'm unable to give pricing information.
My team has less than a thousand users of ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, in particular, seven hundred users.
My company has a partnership with ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer.
My advice for anyone looking to implement ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is that it's good to implement. If you're looking for a single solution that's multipurpose and can be used for change management, incident management, patching, and ticketing, consider ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer. You can get an entire suite of applications from ManageEngine and more modules that are easy to integrate, so that's the best part.
I'm rating ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer nine out of ten, and it's not a ten because the solution still needs more automation and more AI. It's a good solution currently, but it needs to be more futuristic.