| Manager ITSM at Lucky Cement Limited | 4.5 | I use HP IMC for network monitoring, backup, and automated configuration. It's stable, scalable, and saves me significant time and cost. Though Fortinet integration needs work, I'm very satisfied and rate it 9/10. |
| Network and Network Performance Monitoring and Diagnostics (NPMD) Expert at Unemployed | 4.0 | I use HPE Intelligent Management Center to manage network switches efficiently, benefiting from its user-friendly interface and quick responses in critical situations. However, it lacks diversity in models, safety features, and online support compared to alternatives like SolarWinds. |
| Network and security manager at SICIO | 3.5 | I use HPE Intelligent Management Center for monitoring and deploying firmware. It offers comprehensive functionality, including customizable reports, but is slow when navigating. It supports SNMP for third-party devices but has limited firmware deployment capabilities beyond HPE. Previously, I used Nagios/Centreon. |
| Network Administrator at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I use HPE IMC for network monitoring, appreciating its infrastructure monitoring and stability. I desire more modules and am concerned about its future availability, rating it 7/10 despite its reasonable cost. |
| Team Leader Security Operations with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I use this solution primarily for HP patch management. While the interface is easy to use, I've found stability and integration with other devices need improvement, and it's expensive. I recommend it for HP users, rating it 7/10. |
| Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 4.5 | I find IMC an exceptionally versatile NMS with unmatched network interrogation and management, delivering significant ROI. However, weak documentation, poor intuition, and cumbersome technical support make for a steep learning curve. |
| Network Engineer at a construction company with 501-1,000 employees | 2.0 | While offering strong interoperability and stability, I found its setup difficult, ease of use poor, and customer service horrible. Scalability and data retention are also issues, making me now prefer alternatives like SolarWinds. |
